Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Physical and Mental Health Predictors.

BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis face substantial physical, psychological, and social challenges as they move into adolescence and adulthood, which are likely to impact on their health-related quality of life. This study sought to examine the relative importance of physical and mental health variables associated with health-related quality of life in this group. METHODS: Adults and adolescents (N = 174; ≥14 y old) from across 11 adult or pediatric cystic fibrosis clinics in the Republic of Ireland, completed a background questionnaire that contained self-reported physical health variables, pulmonary function (ie, FEV1%) and body mass index. Questionnaire packs also contained the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, which has been specifically designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: HADS depression and/or anxiety scores were negatively associated with 11 of the 12 Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised domain scores. FEV1% was positively associated with 8 domains when controlling for HADS anxiety but only 4 domains when controlling for HADS depression. HADS anxiety and depression scores demonstrated larger effect sizes and explained a greater proportion of the variance than pulmonary function in 8 of the 12 Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised domain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health variables, depression and anxiety, were strongly associated with health-related quality of life in subjects with cystic fibrosis and demonstrated greater effect sizes and explained a higher proportion of the variance overall than the physical health indicators, FEV1% and body mass index, which highlighted the importance of screening for, and treating, depression and anxiety symptoms.

Positive mental health and wellbeing in adults with cystic fibrosis: A cross sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for depression and anxiety in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) is recommended but this alone can miss the opportunity to assess and promote positive mental health and wellbeing. This cross-sectional study assessed positive mental health and wellbeing, and associations with physical health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with CF. METHODS: Adults (n = 147) with CF from 9 CF centres in the Republic of Ireland completed the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised. Demographic and physical health outcome data were also collected. RESULTS: High levels of positive mental health and wellbeing were reported in this sample. There were significant associations between positive 'mental health and wellbeing' and pulmonary function, self-reported physical health and recent hospitalizations. Positive mental health was significantly associated with 11 of the 12 CFQ-R domains assessing HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Assessing and promoting positive mental health and wellbeing may contribute to improving or maintaining physical and mental health, and HRQoL in patients with cystic fibrosis. It provides valuable clinical information to complement depression and anxiety screening and has potential to track the effectiveness of mental health promotion strategies by assessing and monitoring positive mental health and wellbeing over time. Individuals with CF may benefit from interventions that promote positive mental health and wellbeing by enhancing coping and problem-solving skills and fostering hope and optimism. Future research should focus on the development and testing of positive mental health and wellbeing promotion interventions in people with CF.

Online versus paper-based screening for depression and anxiety in adults with cystic fibrosis in Ireland: a cross-sectional exploratory study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare online and paper-based screening for depression and anxiety in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study in CF clinics in Ireland and through the Cystic Fibrosis Ireland online community. PARTICIPANTS: 160 adult patients aged 18 or above were recruited. Of these, 147 were included in the analysis; 83 online and 64 paper-based. The remaining 13 were excluded because of incomplete data. MEASURES: Depression and anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data on pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s %) and body mass index were self-reported based on clinical assessments. Sociodemographic data were collected. RESULTS: Compared with the paper-based participants, the online participants were more likely to be female (61.7% vs 48.4%), older (mean 32.2 vs 28.2 years) and were more likely to be married (32.5% vs 15.6%), living with their spouse or partner (42.5% vs 22.6%) and working either full time (33.7% vs 15.9%) or part time (30.1%vs 17.5%). The prevalence rates of elevated anxiety and depression were not significantly different (P=0.71 and P=0.56). HADS anxiety and depression scores were not statistically different between online (P=0.83) and paper-based (P=0.92) participants based on Mann-Whitney U test. A significant negative correlation was found between depression and pulmonary function (r=-0.39, P=0.01) and anxiety and pulmonary function (r=-0.36, P=0.02). Based on Cronbach's alpha, there were no statistically significant differences between the online and paper-based participants on the internal consistency of the HADS anxiety (P=0.073) and depression (P=0.378) scales. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that online and paper-based screening for depression and anxiety in adult patients with CF yield comparable findings on prevalence rates and scores, associations with health and internal consistency of subscales. This study highlights that online screening offers an alternative method to paper-based screening. Further research with a larger sample and assessment of measurement equivalence between online and paper based screening is needed to confirm our results.

Investigation of a regulatory agency enquiry into potential porcine circovirus type 1 contamination of the human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix: approach and outcome.

In January 2010, porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) DNA was unexpectedly detected in the oral live-attenuated human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] Vaccines) by an academic research team investigating a novel, highly sensitive analysis not routinely used for adventitious agent screening. GSK rapidly initiated an investigation to confirm the source, nature and amount of PCV1 in the vaccine manufacturing process and to assess potential clinical implications of this finding. The investigation also considered the manufacturer's inactivated poliovirus (IPV)-containing vaccines, since poliovirus vaccine strains are propagated using the same cell line as the rotavirus vaccine strain. Results confirmed the presence of PCV1 DNA and low levels of PCV1 viral particles at all stages of the Rotarix manufacturing process. PCV type 2 DNA was not detected at any stage. When tested in human cell lines, productive PCV1 infection was not observed. There was no immunological or clinical evidence of PCV1 infection in infants who had received Rotarix in clinical trials. PCV1 DNA was not detected in the IPV-containing vaccine manufacturing process beyond the purification stage. Retrospective testing confirmed the presence of PCV1 DNA in Rotarix since the initial stages of its development and in vaccine lots used in clinical studies conducted pre- and post-licensure. The acceptable safety profile observed in clinical trials of Rotarix therefore reflects exposure to PCV1 DNA. The investigation into the presence of PCV1 in Rotarix could serve as a model for risk assessment in the event of new technologies identifying adventitious agents in the manufacturing of other vaccines and biological products.

Vaccination of adults 65 years of age and older with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Boostrix(®)): results of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Pertussis can cause significant morbidity in elderly patients, who can also transmit this disease to infants and young children. There is little data available on the use of acellular pertussis vaccines in recipients ≥65 years of age. METHODS: Two studies examined the safety and immunogenicity of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine (Boostrix(®)) in healthy ≥65 year olds. In Study A subjects received single doses of Tdap and seasonal influenza vaccine either co-administered or given one month apart. In Study B subjects received either Tdap or tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine. Antibodies were measured before and one month after vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were actively assessed using diary cards. RESULTS: A total of 1104 subjects 65 years of age and older received a Tdap vaccination in the two studies. In study A, no differences in immune responses to Tdap or influenza vaccine were observed between co-administered or sequentially administered vaccines. In study B, Tdap was non-inferior to Td with respect to diphtheria and tetanus seroprotection, and anti-pertussis GMCs were non-inferior to those observed in infants following a 3-dose diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) primary vaccination series, in whom efficacy against pertussis was demonstrated. Reports of adverse events were similar between Tdap and Td groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tdap was found to be immunogenic in subjects ≥65 years, with a safety profile comparable to US-licensed Td vaccine. Tdap and influenza vaccine may be co-administered without compromise of either the reactogenicity or immunogenicity profiles of the two vaccines.

An open-label, randomized, multi-center study of the immunogenicity and safety of DTaP-IPV (Kinrix™) co-administered with MMR vaccine with or without varicella vaccine in healthy pre-school age children.

BACKGROUND: In the US, it is recommended that 4-6 year old children receive diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), varicella (V), and influenza vaccines. Data relating to the concomitant administration of combination DTaP-IPV vaccine (Kinrix™; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) and influenza or V vaccines are currently limited. This study was undertaken to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Kinrix™ when co-administered with MMR (M-M-RII(®), Merck & Co.) and Varivax™ (Merck & Co.) in 4-6 year old children. METHODS: Phase IIIb, open-label, non-inferiority study (NCT00871117). We randomized (1:1) healthy 4-6 year olds to receive Kinrix™+MMR+V on day 0 (Group 1), or Kinrix™+MMR on day 0, followed by V at month 1 (Group 2). We measured DTaP-IPV immunogenicity before and 1 month post-vaccination (prior to V vaccination in Group 2). We collected local and general solicited symptoms within 4 days after vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) through 6 months post-vaccination. RESULTS: We enrolled 478 subjects. One month post-vaccination, >95% of subjects in both groups had booster responses to diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antigens and all subjects had seroprotective anti-poliovirus antibody titers. Immune responses in Group 1 were non-inferior to Group 2 for responses to DTaP-IPV antigens according to pre-specified criteria. Reporting of solicited local events at the DTaP-IPV site appeared to be similar between the two vaccine groups, as was reporting of solicited general adverse events within 4 days of vaccination; no vaccine related SAEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of varicella vaccine with Kinrix™ and MMR did not impact the immunogenicity of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis or poliovirus antigens. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated. These results support the co-administration of DTaP-IPV, MMR, and V vaccines in 4-6-year-old children, providing protection against multiple diseases in a timely and efficient manner.

Persistence of antibodies 3 years after booster vaccination of adults with combined acellular pertussis, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine.

The duration of protection after vaccination with reduced antigen content diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap) is not known. Long-term post-vaccination serological data will help to improve understanding of the duration of humoral immunity and guide vaccination policy for the timing of repeat dose administration. The persistence of antibodies to Tdap antigens was measured 3 years after vaccination of adults 19-64 years of age with one of 2 Tdap vaccines (Boostrix(®), GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; Tdap-B: or Adacel(®), Sanofi Pasteur; Tdap-A). In both groups, geometric mean concentrations for antibodies to diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine antigens were decreased at year 3 relative to levels observed 1 month and 1 year following vaccination, but remained higher than pre-vaccination levels. Seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus remained high for both Tdap vaccines (for diphtheria, 96.9% and 97.8% for the Tdap-B and Tdap-A groups, respectively; for tetanus, 98.1% and 99.6%, respectively).

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of co-administered tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate (MCV4) vaccines compared to their separate administration.

In the United States, co-administration of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) is recommended in adolescents. In this clinical study, 1341 adolescents received Tdap (Boostrix® GlaxoSmithKline) and MCV4 (Menactra®, Sanofi-Pasteur) simultaneously or sequentially one month apart. Co-administration of Tdap+MCV4 was well tolerated and immunogenic, resulting in high levels of antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and meningococcal serogroup A,C,W-135 and Y antigens. The data provide support for current recommendations for co-administration of Tdap and MCV4 vaccines at the same office visit.

Post-marketing safety evaluation of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and 3-component acellular pertussis vaccine administered to a cohort of adolescents in a United States health maintenance organization.

BACKGROUND: Prelicensure clinical studies may not include sufficient numbers of subjects to assess the potential for rare postvaccination adverse events. The aim of this postlicensure study (NCT00297856) was to evaluate uncommon outcomes following vaccination with a tetanus, reduced-antigen-content diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, Boostrix GlaxoSmithKline) in a large adolescent cohort. METHODS: We monitored safety outcomes among 13,427 10 to 18-year-old adolescents enrolled in the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Health Care Plan who received Tdap vaccination as part of their normal health care. Subjects were evaluated using self-control analysis comparing days 0 to 29 to days 30 to 59 postvaccination for neurologic events, hematologic events and allergic reactions. We evaluated new onset chronic illnesses within 6 months of Tdap vaccination by comparing with historical Td controls matched for age at vaccination, season, sex, and geographic area. We also compared the incidence of events of interest between the Tdap and historical cohorts as exploratory analyses. RESULTS: No increased risk for medically attended neurologic (odds ratio [OR], 0.962; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.533-1.733) or allergic reactions (OR, 1.091; 95% CI, 0.441-2.729) was observed following Tdap vaccination when comparing the first 30 postvaccination days to the second 30 postvaccination days. There was one hematologic event within 30 days of Tdap, compared with 0 events within days 30 to 59 (P = 1.0). When compared with matched historical Td recipients, no increase in new onset chronic illnesses (OR, 0.634; 95% CI, 0.475-0.840) was seen after Tdap. No deaths occurred in the Tdap cohort during the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides no evidence for an increased risk for neurologic, hematologic, allergic events, or new onset of chronic illnesses among adolescents vaccinated with Tdap.

Safety and immunogenicity of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine when co-administered with influenza vaccine in adults.

Annual vaccination with trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV), and a single dose of tetanus toxoid-reduced diphtheria toxoid-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine, are both recommended for adults in the US. This study was conducted to obtain information on the safety and immunogenicity of co-administered TIV and a Tdap vaccine (Boostrix) in US adults. The immunogenicity and safety of Tdap and TIV was evaluated in 1,497 adult subjects 19-64 years of age, who were randomized to receive Tdap and TIV either concomitantly or one month apart (TIV followed by Tdap). Seroprotection rates for diphtheria, tetanus and influenza antigens were high (>or=94.1%) for both vaccine regimens, and immune responses to these antigens in the concomitant group were non-inferior to those observed in the sequential group. Although antibody concentrations for pertussis antigens were lower in the concomitant group than in the sequential group, concomitant administration was shown to be non-inferior to sequential administration with respect to anti-pertussis toxoid concentrations one month after Tdap vaccination. For filamentous haemagglutinin and pertactin, the between-group differences in antibody concentrations marginally exceeded pre-specified limits for defining non-inferiority. In both groups, anti-pertussis antibody concentrations were greater than those observed in infants following primary DTaP vaccination, in whom vaccine efficacy against pertussis was demonstrated. Reporting of adverse events appeared to be similar between groups. The data support the conclusion that Tdap and TIV vaccines may be co-administered without compromising either the effectiveness or tolerability of either vaccine.

Immunogenicity and safety of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and three-component acellular pertussis vaccine in adults 19-64 years of age.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine containing three pertussis antigens (Boostrix, Tdap3v), currently licensed in the US for use in adolescents 10-18 years of age, in adults 19-64 years of age. METHODS: 2284 healthy adults, aged 19-64 years, were randomized to receive a single dose of Tdap vaccine, either Tdap3v or a five-pertussis component Tdap vaccine (Adacel, Tdap5v) licensed for adult use in the US. Blood samples were taken before and 1 month after vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 15 days after vaccination. RESULTS: Tdap3v was comparable to Tdap5v in eliciting seroprotective levels of antibodies to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, with >98% of subjects having post-vaccination seroprotective antibody levels (> or =0.1 IU/mL) against diphtheria or tetanus toxoids. The pertussis components of Tdap3v were shown to be immunogenic in adults, with booster responses to pertussis toxoid (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), and pertactin (PRN) observed in 77.2%, 96.9%, and 93.2%, respectively, of Tdap3v recipients, and in 47.1%, 94.0%, and 91.7%, respectively, of Tdap5v recipients. Anti-pertussis antibody GMCs in Tdap3v recipients exceeded those observed in infants following primary DTaP vaccination, in whom efficacy against pertussis disease was subsequently demonstrated. Injection site reactions (pain, redness, and swelling) and fever > or =37.5 degrees C (99.5 degrees F) were reported significantly more often (p<0.05) by Tdap5v recipients than by Tdap3v recipients. Fatigue preventing normal daily activities was reported by a small but significantly greater percentage of Tdap3v recipients (2.5%) than Tdap5v recipients (1.2%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In adult recipients, Tdap3v was comparable to an approved Tdap vaccine in providing seroprotection against diphtheria and tetanus, and produced immune responses to pertussis antigens consistent with protection against disease. The overall safety profile of Tdap3v was generally comparable to that of Tdap5v [NCT #106316].

A population-based, postlicensure evaluation of the safety of a combination diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine in a large managed care organization.

BACKGROUND: Prelicensure studies of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated polio virus vaccine suggested that there were higher rates of fever after its administration than when its component antigens were given separately. METHODS: We conducted an open, controlled, cohort study to evaluate selected potential adverse events after receipt of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente Health Care Plan. From April 2003 through June 2005, we identified 61,004 infants who received >or=1 dose of vaccine (120000 total doses). This group was compared with a previous cohort of 58,251 age-, gender-, and medical center-matched infants (116,637 doses) who received diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccine and separate doses of hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines from January 2002 through March 2003. We compared the incidence of seizures, medically attended events that were associated with fever, and other selected adverse outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 16 infants (8 with fever) who had a seizure in the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus cohort and 15 infants (6 with fever) among control subjects in the 8-day period after receipt of any dose of vaccine. The incidence of all seizures or seizures associated with fever was not significantly different between cohorts. The incidence of medically attended events that were associated with fever in the 4-day period after any dose of vaccine was also similar in both cohorts. As well, no significant differences between the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus and control cohorts, were noted in the incidence of allergic reactions within 48 hours of any dose of vaccine, outpatient visits within 21 days, hospitalizations within 21 days, or death within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a statistically significant increase in any of several clinically important safety events after diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccination compared with a historical cohort who received separate component vaccines.

Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus vaccines given separately or combined for booster dosing at 4-6 years of age.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) and inactivated poliovirus (IPV) booster vaccinations are recommended for children 4-6 years of age. A combined DTaP-IPV vaccine is being developed, which would reduce by one the number of injections in this age group. METHODS: Children 4-6 years of age were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive booster vaccination with 1 of 3 combined DTaP-IPV lots plus the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (N = 3156 for pooled lots) or separate doses of DTaP + IPV + measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (N = 1053). Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of children (N = 1331). Safety (solicited and unsolicited symptoms) including detailed assessment of local swelling reactions, was assessed in all children. RESULTS: Increases in antibody geometric mean concentrations/titers 1 month after vaccination were observed for the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and polio antigens. At least 92.2% of combined DTaP-IPV subjects and 92.6% of separate DTaP + IPV subjects had a postvaccination booster response for one or more DTaP antigens. Booster responses to one or more poliovirus antigens were observed in at least 96.6% of combined DTaP-IPV subjects and 92.8% of separate DTaP + IPV subjects. The combined DTaP-IPV vaccine was noninferior to separately administered DTaP and IPV vaccines with respect to DTaP antigen booster response rates and poliovirus antibody geometric mean titers ratios. Reporting of solicited local and systemic events was comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination DTaP-IPV vaccine provided immunogenicity and reactogenicity that is comparable to separately administered DTaP and IPV vaccines, with the advantage of requiring one less injection.

Immunogenicity of reduced antigen content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine in adolescents as a sixth consecutive dose of acellular pertussis-containing vaccine.

Three hundred and nineteen adolescents aged 10-12 years who had been previously vaccinated with five doses of acellular pertussis-containing vaccines received single doses of Tdap (reduced-antigen-content tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis) and hepatitis A vaccines in a double-blind crossover trial. Long-term antibody persistence following vaccination with Tdap at pre-school age was similar to that following vaccination with DTaP (diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis). After the sixth dose booster, Tdap induced a vigorous immune response, consistent with protection against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis diseases.

Safety of reduced-antigen-content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine in adolescents as a sixth consecutive dose of acellular pertussis-containing vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: The safety of a booster dose of a reduced-antigen-content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine was evaluated in adolescents previously vaccinated with five doses of acellular pertussis-containing vaccine. STUDY DESIGN: Adolescents (n = 319) previously vaccinated with either 5 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) (n = 193) or 4 doses of DTaP plus another acellular pertussis-containing vaccine received one dose each of Tdap and hepatitis A vaccine in a double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial. Rates of adverse events (AEs) after vaccination with Tdap versus hepatitis A and rates of local AEs among adolescents vaccinated with Tdap (sixth acellular pertussis-containing vaccine dose) versus rates in these same individuals after vaccination with their fifth DTaP dose were assessed. RESULTS: After Tdap, pain (63.6%), redness (51.7%), and swelling (41.4%) were the most frequently reported AEs. Large injection site swelling (swelling > 100 mm, arm circumference increase > 50 mm or diffuse swelling interfering with daily activities) occurred in three adolescents and resolved without sequelae. After the sixth dose of acellular pertussis-containing vaccine, adolescents reported more pain and less redness and swelling compared with incidences of these AEs reported when these same individuals received their fifth DTaP dose. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Tdap is well tolerated as a sixth consecutive dose of acellular pertussis-containing vaccine.

Immunogenicity and safety of a combined DTaP-IPV vaccine compared with separate DTaP and IPV vaccines when administered as pre-school booster doses with a second dose of MMR vaccine to healthy children aged 4-6 years.

Combination vaccines represent one solution to the problem of increased numbers of injections during single clinic visits. A combined DTaP-IPV (Infanrix-IPV) vaccine has been developed for use as a pre-school booster. Four hundred healthy children aged 4-6 years previously primed with 4 doses of DTaP vaccine (Infanrix), 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine and 1 dose of MMR vaccine were randomized to receive single doses of either the combined DTaP-IPV vaccine or separate DTaP and IPV vaccines in a Phase II trial (DTaP-IPV-047). All children also received a second dose of MMR vaccine. Immunogenicity was assessed in serum samples taken before and 1 month after booster administration. Safety was actively assessed for 42 days post-vaccination. Non-inferiority of the DTaP-IPV vaccine to separate DTaP and IPV vaccines was demonstrated for all DTaP antigen booster response rates and poliovirus geometric mean titers of antibody ratios. Post-vaccination, > or =99.4% of children in both groups had seroprotective levels of anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibodies (> or =0.1IU/mL) and seroprotective anti-poliovirus antibody titers (> or =1:8). All children in both groups were seropositive for measles, mumps and rubella antibodies, with similar post-vaccination geometric mean concentrations/titers. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of solicited local or general symptoms, unsolicited symptoms and serious adverse events between the two groups. This combined DTaP-IPV appeared safe and immunogenic when given as a booster dose at 4-6 years of age. The DTaP-IPV vaccine had no negative effect on the response to co-administered MMR vaccine, making it well-suited for use as a pre-school booster.

Serum antibody responses after intradermal vaccination against influenza.

BACKGROUND: If found to be safe and immunogenic, reduced doses of influenza vaccine given by the intradermal route could increase the number of available doses of vaccine. METHODS: In an open-label study, we randomly assigned 119 subjects to receive an intradermal injection of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, containing 6 mug of hemagglutinin for each antigen (40 percent of the usual dose), and 119 to receive an intramuscular injection of the standard dose of 15 mug of hemagglutinin for each antigen. The two groups were subdivided according to age (18 to 60 years and older than 60 years). RESULTS: Among subjects who were 18 to 60 years of age, serum antibody responses were vigorous and did not differ significantly between the intradermal and intramuscular groups, and all subjects had hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers of at least 1:40. Although the subjects who were older than 60 years of age also had a vigorous antibody response, there was a trend toward a better response in the intramuscular route, but this finding was significant only for antigen to the H3N2 strain. Nevertheless, 100 percent of older subjects in the intramuscular group and 93 percent of such subjects in the intradermal group had an HAI antibody titer to the H3N2 strain of more than 1:40, and 100 percent in each group had a titer of this level for both the H1N1 and B strains. Local pain was significantly more common in the intramuscular group than in the intradermal group among subjects who were 18 to 60 years of age but not among subjects who were over 60 years old. Signs of local inflammation were significantly more common among subjects in the intradermal group than among those in the intramuscular group, in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with an intramuscular injection of full-dose influenza vaccine, an intradermal injection of a reduced dose resulted in similarly vigorous antibody responses among persons 18 to 60 years of age but not among those over the age of 60 years.

Impact of a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine on the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type b combination vaccination.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) on the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a novel diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP)- HepB-inactivated poliovirus (IPV)/ type b (Hib) combination vaccine administered subsequently at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. METHODS: Neonates ( = 550) were randomized into two groups with regard to receipt of HepB at birth. All subjects in both groups received DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Solicited local and general adverse events were recorded for 8 days after each dose. Antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen were measured 1 month after the third dose of DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib in a subset of 170 infants; titers of at least 10 mIU/ml were considered protective. RESULTS: The DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib combination vaccine was well-tolerated in both groups. Of the infants who received a birth dose of HepB, 22.6% had severe (Grade 3) reactions after any of the three doses of DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib combination vaccine compared with 23.2% of subjects who did not receive a birth dose of HepB (difference, -0.5%; 90% confidence interval, -7.4 to 6.1). Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers were > or =10 mIU/ml for all tested infants. Geometric mean titers were 2996.2 and 1240.1 mIU/ml with and without a birth dose of HepB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A HepB birth dose does not increase the reactogenicity of a combination DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib vaccine administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and all tested subjects achieved protective anti-HBs titers (> or =10 mIU/ml), although geometric mean titers were higher when a birth dose of HepB was given.

Safety and immunogenicity of a combination diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine administered at two, four and six months of age compared with monovalent hepatitis B vaccine administered at birth, one month and six months of age.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis (DTPa)-hepatitis B (HepB) combination vaccine given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age compared with monovalent HepB vaccine given at birth, 1 month and 6 months of age and DTPa vaccine given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. METHODS: Healthy infants were randomized to receive a combination DTPa-HepB vaccine (diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis antigens and hepatitis B surface antigen), concomitantly with type b and oral poliovirus vaccines at 2, 4 and 6 months of age (Group 1) or HepB vaccine given at birth, 1 month and 6 months of age and DTPa, type b and oral poliovirus vaccines given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age (Group 2). Antibody responses were evaluated at birth, 2 months and 7 months of age. Safety was evaluated after each immunization using diary cards and parental interviews. RESULTS: One month after the third dose (7 months of age), the geometric mean concentration of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen was approximately 3.5-fold higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 infants (3643 and 1052 mIU/ml, respectively; < 0.001). Nevertheless the rates of seroprotection to HepB (antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen > or =10 mIU/ml) in Groups 1 and 2 were similar, 99 and 100%, respectively. Also the postvaccination geometric mean concentrations and rates of seroprotection or vaccine response to all of the other vaccine antigens evaluated were similar or greater in Group 1 than in Group 2. The rates of adverse events were similar between the two groups, with fussiness and soreness at any injection site reported most frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The DTPa-HepB combination vaccine was safe and immunogenic when given to infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Equivalent rates of seroprotection to hepatitis B were achieved despite a reduction of the interval between the second and third doses from 5 months in Group 2 to 2 months in Group 1. Hepatitis B-containing combination vaccines should reduce the number of vaccine injections required in childhood and maintain excellent seroprotection against multiple pathogens.

Interchangeability of 2 diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines in infancy.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, 4 diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines are licensed for pediatric use in the United States, and 2 are commercially available. Although a single manufacturer's DTaP vaccine should be used for all 3 doses of the primary immunization series, some circumstances result in infants receiving DTaP vaccines from more than 1 manufacturer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a mixed sequence of 2 different DTaP vaccines. METHODS: In this multicenter, observer-blinded, controlled study, 449 infants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups (1:1:1 ratio) to receive Tripedia at 2, 4, and 6 months of age (control group); Tripedia at 2 and 4 months of age and Infanrix at 6 months of age; or Tripedia at 2 months and Infanrix at 4 and 6 months of age. Other vaccines were administered concurrently as separate injections according to the recommended childhood immunization schedule. Safety was monitored closely, and standard enzyme immunoassays were used to measure antibody concentrations to each antigen of the DTaP vaccines. RESULTS: The rates of injection-site and systemic adverse events were similar in each study group, and there were no clinically significant differences among groups after any dose. Infants in all 3 groups responded well to each antigen contained in both vaccines, with 97% to 100% seroprotection or vaccine response rates after the 3-dose primary series. Postvaccination geometric mean antibody concentrations and seroprotection or vaccine response rates to nearly all vaccine antigens were as high or higher in the mixed-sequence groups as in the control group. CONCLUSION: Initiating the primary immunization series with 1 or 2 doses of Tripedia and completing the 3-dose series with Infanrix is as safe and at least as immunogenic as administering Tripedia for all 3 doses.