Predictors of 10-year Mortality After Hip Fracture Surgery in a Pre-Pandemic Cohort.

Introduction: Though hip fractures are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, increasing life expectancy in developed countries necessitates an analysis of mortality trends and factors predicting long term survival. The aim of this study is to identify the predictors of 10-year mortality as well as assess the correlation of Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) with 10-year mortality in a surgically treated Asian geriatric hip fracture population. Materials and Methods: From January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009, 766 patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture with a minimum follow up of 10-years were recruited to the study (92% follow-up rate). A review of the patient's electronic hospital records was performed to glean the following data: patient demographics, pre-existing comorbidities, operation duration, length of stay, fracture configuration, as well as mortality data up to 10 years. CCI scores and individual co-morbidities were correlated with inpatient, 30-day, 1-year, 5-year and beyond 10-year mortality. Results: Of the 766 patients, the mortality rate for 30-day, 1-year, 5-year and 10-years was 2.9%, 12.0%, 38.9% and 61.6% respectively. The average ACCI was 5.31. The 10-year mortality for patients with ACCI ≤ 3, ACCI 4-5 and ACCI ≥ 6 are 29.4%, 57.4% and 77.5% respectively. End-Stage-Renal Failure (ESRF), liver failure and COPD were dominant predictors of mortality at 10 years, whereas cancer was the predominant predictor at 1 year. Discussion: ACCI significantly correlates with the 10-year mortality after surgically treated hip fractures with a shift of the dominant predictors from cancer to ESRF and COPD. This could inform future health policy and resource planning. This data also represents recently available pre-pandemic survival trends after hip fracture surgery and serves as a baseline for post-pandemic outcome surveillance of interventions for fragility fractures. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ACCI correlated with 10-year mortality after surgical treatment of hip fractures.

Systems modelling as an approach for eliciting the mechanisms for hip fracture recovery among older adults in a participatory stakeholder engagement setting.

Introduction: Due to an aging population, the rising prevalence and incidence of hip fractures and the associated health and economic burden present a challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Studies have shown that a complex interplay of physiological, psychological, and social factors often affects the recovery trajectories of older adults with hip fractures, often complicating the recovery process. Methods: This research aims to actively engage stakeholders (including doctors, physiotherapists, hip fracture patients, and caregivers) using the systems modeling methodology of Group Model Building (GMB) to elicit the factors that promote or inhibit hip fracture recovery, incorporating a feedback perspective to inform system-wide interventions. Hip fracture stakeholder engagement was facilitated through the Group Model Building approach in a two-half-day workshop of 25 stakeholders. This approach combined different techniques to develop a comprehensive qualitative whole-system view model of the factors that promote or inhibit hip fracture recovery. Results: A conceptual, qualitative model of the dynamics of hip fracture recovery was developed that draws on stakeholders' personal experiences through a moderated interaction. Stakeholders identified four domains (i.e., expectation formation, rehabilitation, affordability/availability, and resilience building) that play a significant role in the hip fracture recovery journey.. Discussion: The insight that recovery of loss of function due to hip fracture is attributed to (a) the recognition of a gap between pre-fracture physical function and current physical function; and (b) the marshaling of psychological resilience to respond promptly to a physical functional loss via uptake of rehabilitation services is supported by findings and has several policy implications.

A year of COVID-19: Effects of a global pandemic on a hip fracture bundled care protocol.

Introduction: Our aim was to analyse how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affects a hip fracture bundled care protocol. We hypothesised that key performance indicators, but not short-term outcomes, may be adversely affected. Methods: Patients admitted under a hip fracture bundled care protocol were divided into two arms: 'COVID' group included patients admitted in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic and 'PRE-COVID' group included patients admitted in 2019. We retrospectively analysed time to admission, time to surgery, length of stay, discharge disposition, as well as rates of 30-day revision surgery, 30-day readmission and inpatient mortality. Results: There were 307 patients in the PRE-COVID group and 350 patients in the COVID group. There was no significant difference in terms of gender, age and type of hip fracture. The COVID group had a higher proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III and IV patients (61.4% vs. 50.2% in the PRE-COVID group; P = 0.004). In the COVID group, similar proportion of patients were admitted to the ward within 4 h, but the mean time to surgery was longer (71.8 ± 73.0 h vs. 60.4 ± 72.8 h in the PRE-COVID group; P = 0.046) and few patients underwent operations within 48 h (41.7% vs. 60.3% in the PRE-COVID group; P < 0.001). Mean postoperative length of stay, discharge disposition, as well as rates of inpatient mortality, 30-day revision surgery and 30-day readmission were similar. Conclusion: The volume of hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic remained unchanged, although patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be more deconditioned. Nevertheless, having robust protocols and staff familiar with hip fracture treatment can preserve short-term outcomes for this group of patients, even with strict isolation measures in place during a pandemic.

Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Introduction: The role of patient-reported outcomes in preoperative assessment is not well studied. There is recent interest in studying whether Patient-reported outcomes scores can be used either independently, or in conjunction with clinical findings, in the assessment of patients for surgery. Aims: To investigate if improvement in clinically significant scores correlate with post-operative patient satisfaction in 1-2 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery. We also aim to define a threshold Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) which correlate with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction. Methods: 1001 patients who underwent single or double level TLIF (Minimally invasive and Open) in our institution with at least 2 years follow up were included in this study. We studied self-reported measures including patient satisfaction and ODI score. Results: At 2-year follow-up, the overall mean ODI score improved from 49.7 ± 18.3 to 13.9 ± 15.2 (P < 0.001) with 74.6% of patients meeting the MCID. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 95.3% of all patients. In the MIS group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86). In the open group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). Using the preoperative cut-offs found, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in both MIS and open groups. Conclusions: Overall, our patients undergoing TLIF had good 2-year ODI score improvement and patient satisfaction after surgery. While meeting the MCID for ODI score correlates with patients' satisfaction postoperatively, 75% of patients not meeting the MCID for ODI score remained satisfied with the surgery. We are unable to define a threshold pre-operative ODI which correlates with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.

Reduction of geometric misfit in straight antegrade humeral nailing by evaluating the effect of entry point angulation using a three-dimensional computational analysis.

BACKGROUND: Straight antegrade intramedullary nails are generally inserted utilising the apex as the surgical entry point in accordance with the mechanical axis of the bone. Our objective is to optimise the bone-nail fit in intramedullary nailing by subjecting the surgical entry point to varying angulations in both the mediolateral and anterior-posterior directions via a quantitative fit assessment in each configuration to identify the optimal angulation, defined as the angulation with the lowest occurrence of thin-out to improve nail fitting within the humerus. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans from 10 cadaveric humeri models were used to generate three-dimensional bone models. The centreline profile of each humerus model was determined by dividing the humerus into multiple slices and identifying its respective centroid. The guidewire and nail models were then established and inserted into the humerus using the apex as the standard entry point. The bone-nail fit was measured utilising three fit quantification parameters: thin-out distance, nail protrusion volume into the cortical shell and deviation distance (top, middle, bottom) between the nail's longitudinal axis and medullary cavity centroid. FINDINGS: Results revealed a statistically significant association between angulation and occurrence of thin-out (p < .001) and showed that the optimally angulated entry point resulted in decreased cortical breach across the nail insertion depth compared to the standard entry point. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggested that the current straight nail design may require further modifications to optimise the nail trajectory within the medullary canal by decreasing the bone-nail geometric mismatch to potentially maximise its working length.

Incomplete Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fracture With Concomitant Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a case of an incomplete periprosthetic femoral fracture at the mid-distal third of the femoral stem after 11 months of bisphosphonate use. It is 1 of 4 cases of mid-distal periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) found in our literature review. She was treated with protected weight-bearing, cessation of bisphosphonates, and teriparatide. Eighteen months after diagnosis, follow-up radiographs showed a bridging callus and reduction of a transverse fracture line. CONCLUSION: The incomplete PAFF was contributed by both decreased bone turnover from bisphosphonate use and increased mechanical stress at the lateral femoral cortex. Her previous left bipolar hemiarthroplasty and subsequent Total Knee Arthroplasty shifted the mechanical alignment medially, hence increasing tensile stress.

Effect of implant length variations on stress shielding in proximal humeral replacement after tumor excision under torsion: Finite element study.

The proximal humerus is the most common site of occurrence of primary bone tumors in the upper limb. Endoprosthetic replacement is deemed as the preferred reconstructive option following primary resection of bone tumors. However, it has been also associated with complications such as stress shielding and aseptic loosening compromising prosthetic survival. Our objective was to conduct a finite element (FE) study to investigate the effect of varying endoprosthesis length on bone stresses as well as to quantify the extent of stress shielding across the bone length (BL) in a humerus-prosthesis assembly for proximal humeral replacement after tumor excision thereby allowing us to identify the optimal implant length with best biomechanical performance. FE models of the intact humerus and humerus-prosthesis assemblies were established where they were loaded at the elbow joint under torsion with the glenohumeral joint fixed to represent twisting. After dividing the bone into individual slices consisting of 5% BL, the maximum cortical and cancellous principal, von Mises and shear bone stresses were calculated. To measure the level of stress shielding, the percentage stress change from the intact state was evaluated across each slice. Similar stress patterns were observed between the intact state and shorter endoprosthesis compared to the longer endoprostheses. Our findings illustrated the possibility of stress shielding occurring under torsional forces with its effect increasing with implant lengthening. To conclude, we believe that using a shorter prosthesis may substantially diminish the risk of potential implant failure due to stress shielding.

Factors affecting healing and progression of conservatively treated incomplete atypical femoral fractures: retrospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Incomplete atypical femoral fractures (iAFF) may occur with prolonged bisphosphonate usage. Factors influencing iAFF healing and progression are not well understood. This study of conservatively managed iAFF assessed factors influencing iAFF healing and progression including the effects of bisphosphonates and teriparatide use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective observational study of 69 consecutive patients with 78 radiographically confirmed iAFF from 2002 to 2017. Serial radiographs assessed for focal cortical thickening, dreaded black line (DBL) and complete fracture. Chief outcome measures were DBL healing and complete fracture. RESULTS: DBL had a significant association (p < 0.05) with fracture progression by multivariable logistic regression (55.8% versus 25.7%, odds ratio [OR] 26.57 (95% CI 1.40-504.78)) and shorter fracture-free survival (mean 3.21 versus 6.27 years). Presence of symptoms was associated with shorter fracture-free survival (mean 2.68 versus 5.98 years). Discontinuing bisphosphonates had significant associations (p < 0.001) by multivariable logistic regression with decreased fracture rate (11.6% versus 92.0%; OR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-0.08) and longer fracture-free survival (mean 7.52 versus 1.99 years). DBL healing occurred in 36.4%, only when bisphosphonates were discontinued. Age, sex, race, fracture site, glucocorticoid use, teriparatide supplementation and duration of bisphosphonate use showed no statistically significant effect although teriparatide use appeared to improve DBL healing (50% versus 17.9%, p = 0.188). CONCLUSIONS: In conservatively managed iAFF, DBL healing occurred in 36.4% if bisphosphonates were discontinued. Bisphosphonates and DBL were significantly associated with fracture progression and together with symptoms with fracture survival.

Lower socioeconomic status is associated with increased co-morbidity burden and independently associated with time to surgery, length of hospitalisation, and readmission rates of hip fracture patients.

This study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes of hip fracture patients. Lower socioeconomic status is not only associated with poorer comorbidities but is also independently impacting surgical access and outcomes. This can be considered a "double setback" in the management of hip fractures. PURPOSE: The effect of socioeconomic status on hip fracture outcomes remains controversial. We examine the relationship between SES and patient comorbidity, care access, and clinical outcomes of surgically managed hip fracture patients. METHODS: Using healthcare payor status as a surrogate for SES, patients operated for fragility hip fractures between 2013 and 2016 were dichotomised based on payor status, namely private healthcare (PRIV) versus subsidised healthcare (SUB). PRIV patients were compared with SUB patients in terms of demographic data, ASA scores, co-morbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index, CCI), time to surgery, length of acute hospitalisation, and 90-day readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients in group PRIV and 1146 patients in group SUB were included. SUB patients had a higher mean Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) (p = 0.01), a longer length of hospitalisation (p = 0.001), an increased delay in surgery (p = 0.005), and higher 90-day readmission rates (p = 0.013). Lower SES (p = 0.01), older age (p = 0.01), higher CCI (p < 0.01), and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA) (p = 0.03) were predictive of time to surgery. Lower SES (p = 0.02) and higher CCI (p < 0.001) were predictive of the length of hospitalisation. Lower SES (p = 0.04) and higher CCI (p < 0.001) were predictive of 90-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Low SES is associated with higher CCI in surgically treated hip fracture patients. However, it is independently associated with slower access to surgery, a longer hospital stay, and higher readmission rates. Hence, lower SES, with its associated higher CCI and independent impact on surgical access and outcomes, can be considered a "double setback" in the management of fragility hip fractures.

Whole Exome Sequencing in Two Southeast Asian Families With Atypical Femur Fractures.

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are rare complications of anti-resorptive therapy. Devastating to the affected individual, they pose a public health concern because of reduced uptake of an effective treatment for osteoporosis due to patient concern. The risk of AFF is increased sixfold to sevenfold in patients of Asian ethnicity compared with Europeans. Genetic factors may underlie the AFF phenotype. Given the rarity of AFFs, studying familial AFF cases is valuable in providing insights into any genetic predisposition. We present two Singaporean families, one comprising a mother (1-a) and a daughter (1-b), and the other comprising two sisters (2-a and 2-b). All four cases presented with bisphosphonate-associated AFF. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 1-b, 2-a, and 2-b. DNA for 1-a was not available. Variants were examined using a candidate gene approach comprising a list of genes previously associated with AFF in the literature, as well as using unbiased filtering based on dominant and/or recessive inheritance patterns. Using a candidate gene approach, rare variants shared between all three cases were not identified. A rare variant in TMEM25, shared by the two sisters (2-a and 2-b), was identified. A rare heterozygous PLOD2 variant was present in the daughter case with AFF (1-b), but not in the sisters. A list of potential genetic variants for AFF was identified after variant filtering and annotation analysis of the two sisters (2-a and 2-b), including a Gly35Arg variant in TRAF4, a gene required for normal skeletal development. Although the findings from this genetic analysis are inconclusive, a familial aggregation of AFFs is suggestive of a genetic component in AFF pathogenesis. We provide a comprehensive list of rare variants identified in these AFF familial cases to aid future genetic studies. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

End stage renal disease patients undergoing hip fracture surgery have increased length of stay, acute hospital bill size, and reduced survivorship-implications on a bundled care program.

End stage renal disease (ESRD) is an independent risk factor for the development of hip fractures and is associated with a higher mortality and complication rates. As these patients significantly skew healthcare financing in a bundled care payment (BCP) program, a risk stratified approach to BCPs could be done to take into account the difference in resources required. INTRODUCTION: End stage renal disease (ESRD) is an independent risk factor for the development of hip fractures and is associated with a higher mortality and complication rate. Hip fracture patients with ESRD may significantly skew healthcare financing in a bundled care payment (BCP) program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ESRD patients undergoing hip fracture surgery from June 2007 to June 2012 within a tertiary hospital in Singapore were identified and matched to two other controls without ESRD based on secondary features of sex, age, fracture type, and surgery performed. Data was collected for American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, duration of surgery (DOS), length of stay (LOS), 30-day and 1-year mortality, and the presence of 10 other comorbidities: diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), ischemic heart disease (IHD), arrhythmia (ARR), cerebrovascular disease (CVA), dementia (DEM), asthma (ASTH), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and anemia (ANE) from electronic medical records. Costs were retrieved from the gross acute hospitalization bill. RESULTS: Forty-one ESRD patients were successfully matched with 82 controls. Patients with ESRD had higher ASA scores (3 vs 2, p = 0.0001), had 75% higher LOS (21 vs 12 days, p < 0.0001), were associated with 67% higher healthcare expenditure (median $20542 vs $12236, p < 0.0001), and 1-year mortality (OR: 19.6, p < 0.0001). ESRD patients had an average of 4.1 comorbidities per patient compared to 1.84 in the control group. CONCLUSION: ESRD is an outsized factor on the outcome of hip fracture patients who have markedly higher and more variable healthcare utilization.

Bilateral Atypical Femur Fractures After Denosumab in a Bisphosphonate Naive Patient: A Case Report.

A case report of bilateral atypical femur fractures (AFF) in a bisphosphonate naive patient. A 62-year-old female bisphosphonate naive patient was started on denosumab for osteoporosis. Approximately 3 years later she complained of right hip pain and was found to have a bilateral incomplete AFFs. She was asymptomatic on the left lower limb. Patient was managed conservatively and placed on protected weight bearing on both legs. Symptoms subsequently resolved over a period of 3 months, although radiographic findings remained at approximately 1 year. AFFs may be associated with patients on denosumab therapy even without a prior history of bisphosphonate use. Patients should be counselled appropriately and monitored for such complications.

Developing a Simpler Prognosticating Tool: Comparing the Combined Assessment of Risk Encountered in Surgery Score with Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index and The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score in Predicting 2 years Mortality after Hip Fracture Surgery.

Background: The use of risk stratification tools in identifying high-risk hip fracture patients plays an important role during treatment. The aim of this study was to compare our locally derived Combined Assessment of Risk Encountered in Surgery (CARES) score with the the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) score and the Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (D-CCI) in predicting 2-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Methods and Material: A retrospective study was conducted on surgically treated hip fracture patients in a large tertiary hospital from Jan 2013 through Dec 2015. Age, gender, time to surgery, ASA-PS score, D-CCI, and CARES score were obtained. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess statistical significance of scores and risk factors, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to compare ASA-PS, D-CCI, and CARES as predictors of mortality at 2 years. Results: 763 surgically treated hip fracture patients were included in this study. The 2-year mortality rate was 13.1% (n = 100), and the mean ± SD CARES score of surviving and demised patients was 21.2 ± 5.98 and 25.9 ± 5.59, respectively. Using AUC, CARES was shown to be a better predictor of 2-year mortality than ASA-PS, but we found no statistical difference between CARES and D-CCI. A CARES score of 23, attributable primarily to pre-surgical morbidities and poor health of the patient, was identified as the statistical threshold for "high" risk of 2-year mortality. Conclusion: The CARES score is a viable risk predictor for 2-year mortality following hip fracture surgery and is comparable to the D-CCI in predictive capability. Our results support the use of a simpler yet clinically relevant CARES in prognosticating mortality following hip fracture surgery, particularly when information on the pre-existing comorbidities of the patient is not immediately available.

Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index Increases 90-Day Readmission Rate with Poorer Functional Outcomes in Surgically Treated Hip Fracture Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The associated mortality and morbidity in hip fracture patients pose a major healthcare burden for ageing populations worldwide. We aim to analyse how an individual's comorbidity profile based on age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) may impact on functional outcomes and 90-day readmission rates after hip fracture surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgically treated hip fracture patients between 2013 and 2016 were followed up for 1-year and assessed using Parker Mobility Score (PMS), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Physical and Mental Component Scores (PCS and MCS, respectively) of Short Form-36 (SF-36). Statistical analysis was done by categorising 444 patients into three groups based on their CCI: (1) CCI 0-3, (2) CCI 4-5 and (3) CCI ≥ 6. RESULTS: PMS, EQ-5D and SF-36 PCS were significantly different amongst the CCI groups pre-operatively and post-operatively at 3, 6 and 12 months (all P < 0.05), with CCI ≥ 6 predicting for poorer outcomes. In terms of 90-day readmission rates, patients who have been readmitted have poorer outcome scores. Multivariate analysis showed that high CCI scores and 90-day readmission rate both remained independent predictors of worse outcomes for SF-36 PCS, PMS and EQ-5D. DISCUSSION: CCI scores ≥6 predict for higher 90-day readmission rates, poorer quality of life and show poor potential for functional recovery 1-year post-operation in hip fracture patients. 90-day readmission rates are also independently associated with poorer functional outcomes. Peri-operatively, surgical teams should liaise with medical specialists to optimise patients' comorbidities and ensure their comorbidities remain well managed beyond hospital discharge to reduce readmission rates. With earlier identification of patient groups at risk of poorer functional outcomes, more planning can be directed towards appropriate management and subsequent rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Further research should focus on development of a stratified, peri-operative multidisciplinary, hip-fracture care pathway treatment regime based on CCI scores to determine its effectiveness in improving functional outcomes.

Ultrasonic Percutaneous Tenotomy for Recalcitrant Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: Clinical and Sonographic Results at 90 Months.

BACKGROUND: In a study from our institution, ultrasonic percutaneous tenotomy of the brevis and the common extensor tendon for recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinopathy showed excellent safety profiles, high tolerability, efficiency, sustained pain relief, functional improvement, and sonographic evidence of tissue healing in 20 patients at 3 years' follow-up. PURPOSE: To explore the long-term clinical and sonographic results of ultrasonic percutaneous tenotomy of the brevis and the common extensor tendon. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The same cohort of 20 patients was recalled after 7 years, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, need for secondary intervention, and overall satisfaction were assessed. They were also reassessed using ultrasound imaging of the brevis and the common extensor tendon to evaluate tendon hypervascularity, tendon thickness, and the progress or the recurrence of the hypoechoic scar tissue. RESULTS: We successfully scored 19 patients and performed ultrasound on 16 patients with a median follow-up of 90 months (range, 86-102 months). There were no adverse outcomes and satisfaction remained at 100% (6 patients, satisfied; 13 patients, very satisfied). No patient developed a recurrence of symptoms and signs of lateral elbow tendinopathy, and therefore no secondary intervention was required. The improvement from baseline and early term scores was sustained (P < .001 for all). At 90 months, there was a significant improvement in VAS scores and DASH-Compulsory scores compared with preprocedure scores and all follow-up times until 3 months. There was no difference in VAS scores and DASH-Compulsory scores at 90 months compared with 6 and 36 months. For DASH-Work scores, there was a significant improvement at 90 months compared with preprocedure scores, but there was no difference between DASH-Work scores at 90 months and scores at all other points of follow-up. At 90 months, hypervascularity remained resolved in 79% of patients, while all patients had reduced tendon swelling and sustained resolution or reduction of the hypoechoic lesion. CONCLUSION: At the long-term follow-up of 90 months, ultrasonic percutaneous tenotomy of the brevis and the common extensor tendon, previously shown to enhance recovery of lateral elbow tendinopathy, demonstrated good durability of pain relief and functional recovery that was previously achieved. This was accompanied by sustained sonographic tissue healing with no significant deterioration.

Early Postoperative Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Subsequent Poorer Functional Outcomes and Lower Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies investigating the effects of acute postoperative pain on functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aims of this study are to identify perioperative factors associated with increased early postoperative pain and investigate the effects of acute postoperative day 1 and 2 pain on outcomes at 6 months and 2 years post-TKA. METHODS: 1041 unilateral TKA patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were categorized into minor (visual analog scale: VAS <5) and major (VAS ≥5) pain groups based on postoperative day 1/2 VAS scores. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years using Knee Society Knee Score and Function Scores (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 physical and mental component score (SF-36 PCS), expectation and satisfaction scores. Perioperative variables including age, gender, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist status, type of anesthesia, and presence of caregiver were analyzed as predictors of postoperative acute pain. Wilcoxon two-sample test was used to analyze outcomes significantly associated with "major pain." Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of "major pain." RESULTS: Patients with "minor pain" had significantly better KSFS, Knee Society Knee Score, OKS, and SF-36 PCS scores at 6 months and significantly better KSFS, OKS, SF-36 PCS, and satisfaction at 2 years (P < .05). A significantly higher percentage of patients with "minor pain" met the minimal clinically important difference for SF-36 PCS at 6 months and KSFS at 2 years (P < .05). Women, Indian/Malay race, higher BMI, and use of general over regional anesthesia were independent predictors of getting "major pain" (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients should be counseled about risk factors of postoperative pain to manage preoperative expectations of surgery. Patients should be managed adequately using multimodal pain protocols to improve subsequent functional outcomes while avoiding unnecessary opioid use.

Studies of the criteria for determining optimal location of medial patellofemoral ligament attachment sites.

Identifying appropriate attachment sites is important in the planning of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Two criteria are advanced to describe normal MPFL function, namely isometric criterion and desired pattern criterion. Subsequently, computational methods have applied these criteria to determine optimal attachment sites. So far, there is no study that compares the outcomes of these two criteria. For five subjects' 3D models of the patella and femur, three patellar sites and many femoral sites were identified as pairs of candidate attachment sites. For each patellar site, the criteria were applied to identify the matching femoral sites that satisfy them. The matching femoral site with the smallest length change was identified as the optimal femoral site. The desired pattern criterion finds fewer matching sites compared to the isometric criterion. In contrast, the isometric criterion can always find matching sites. The optimal femoral sites obtained vary significantly across different subjects. For most subjects, the optimal sites obtained using the isometric criterion are closer to known anatomical sites than those obtained using the desired pattern criterion. This study reaffirms that MPFL reconstruction is subject specific. The isometric criterion may be more reliable than the desired pattern criterion for determining optimal attachment sites. Graphical Abstract. Highlight of the paper. The location of the patella site significantly affects the location of the optimal femoral site. The isometric criterion option 1, with length at 0° regarded as MPFL's natural length, may be more reliable than other criteria or options for the planning of MPFL surgery because the optimal sites that it finds are closest to known anatomical sites.ᅟ.

Preoperative hypoalbuminemia: Poor functional outcomes and quality of life after hip fracture surgery.

AIMS: Hip fracture patients have severe deterioration of their quality of life and function after their injury. Markers of malnutrition such as low albumin and low body mass index (BMI) have been shown to increase mortality and complication rates but their effect on recovery of quality of life and function after hip fracture surgery is unclear. The main aim of this paper is to further investigate if low albumin affects recovery after hip fracture surgery, while additionally studying low BMI as a possible risk factor for poor recovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 971 patients who underwent surgery for fragility hip fractures between January 2012 and December 2016 was performed. Demographic data, preoperative serum albumin and haemoglobin levels, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), type of surgery (fixation vs replacement) and site of surgery were obtained. Patients were assessed using the Parker Mobility Scale (PMS), Harris Hip Score(HHS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36) at pre-fracture, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. HHS was not available pre-operatively. Patients were grouped according to their albumin levels (low ≤35 g/L or normal) and BMI (underweight <18.5 or normal). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the association between albumin and BMI and 6-month scores. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, patients with low albumin ≤35 g/L had lower baseline PMS and SF36 Physical Functioning (PF) score. On multivariate analysis, preoperative hypoalbuminemia was associated with lower 6-month HHS, PMS and SF36 PF scores even after accounting for baseline scores and other confounders. BMI had no effect on 6-month scores. CONCLUSION: Low albumin (≤35 g/L) is prevalent in elderly hip fracture patients and is associated with slower recovery of function and quality of life after surgery. Low albumin can be a useful prognostic tool to identify patients with poor recovery for further intervention or rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery.

From "business continuity" to "back to business" for orthopaedic surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Orthopaedic departments have adopted business continuity models and guidelines for essential and non-essential surgeries to preserve hospital resources as well as protect patients and staff. These guidelines broadly encompass reduction of ambulatory care with a move towards telemedicine, redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons/residents to the frontline battle against COVID-19, continuation of education and research through web-based means, and cancellation of non-essential elective procedures. However, if containment of COVID-19 community spread is achieved, resumption of elective orthopaedic procedures and transition plans to return to normalcy must be considered for orthopaedic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic also presents a moral dilemma to the orthopaedic surgeon considering elective procedures. What is the best treatment for our patients and how does the fear of COVID-19 influence the risk-benefit discussion during a pandemic? Surgeons must deliberate the fine balance between elective surgery for a patient's wellbeing versus risks to the operating team and utilization of precious hospital resources. Attrition of healthcare workers or Orthopaedic surgeons from restarting elective procedures prematurely or in an unsafe manner may render us ill-equipped to handle the second wave of infections. This highlights the need to develop effective screening protocols or preoperative COVID-19 testing before elective procedures in high-risk, elderly individuals with comorbidities. Alternatively, high-risk individuals should be postponed until the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection is minimal. In addition, given the higher mortality and perioperative morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing surgery, the decision to operate must be carefully deliberated. As we ramp-up elective services and get "back to business" as orthopaedic surgeons, we have to be constantly mindful to proceed in a cautious and calibrated fashion, delivering the best care, while maintaining utmost vigilance to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 during this critical transition period. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:222-228.