ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Our institution created a nightly "Huddle" email for all staff involved in patient care, detailing the next day's cases. This study evaluated the impact of the Huddle email on perioperative efficiency and identified factors associated with operating room delays. METHODS: A total of 1080 first start, open, nonemergent cardiac operations were stratified as Pre-Huddle (January 2013-June 2015) or Huddle (July 2015-January 2017). Scheduled start-to-in-room time (delay time), in-room-to-incision time, and total minutes utilized were analyzed. On-time starts were defined as a delay time of 0 minutes, and long delays were defined as delay time of more than 15 minutes. Long delays were compared with other cases based on preoperative factors. Multivariate regression identified independent predictors of delay time. RESULTS: The analysis included 643 Pre-Huddle and 437 Huddle cases. After Huddle implementation, delay time decreased by 2 minutes (9 minutes Pre-Huddle vs 7 minutes Huddle, P < .001). However, time to incision increased (70 minutes vs 73 minutes, P = .002), as did minutes utilized (373 minutes vs 394 minutes, P = .002) in the Huddle era. On-time entry increased 46% (5.0% to 9.2%, P = .007), and long delay decreased 26% (33.3% vs 24.3%, P = .002). Long delay was associated with urgent cases (58.2% vs 28.6%, P < .001), non-Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality cases (46.9% vs 34.1%, P < .001), and less surgeon experience (7 years vs 9 years, P < .001). Delay time was independently predicted by urgent status (+10.17 minutes), surgeon experience (-0.15 min/y), lung disease (+5.43 minutes), and non-Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (+5.44 minutes) on multivariate regression. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Huddle improved delay time, on-time entry, and long delay. Strategies focused on optimizing perioperative care are beneficial for multidisciplinary teams.
