Open surgical management of complications from indwelling radial artery catheters.

BACKGROUND: Cannulation of the radial artery is frequently performed for invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Complications arising from indwelling catheters have been described in small case series; however, their surgical management is not well described. Understanding the presentation and management of such complications is imperative to offer optimal treatment, particularly because the radial artery is increasingly accessed for percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review to identify patients who underwent surgical intervention for complications arising from indwelling radial artery catheters from 1997 to 2011. RESULTS: We identified 30 patients who developed complications requiring surgical intervention. These complications were categorized into ischemic and nonischemic, with 15 patients identified in each cohort. All patients presenting with clinical hand or digital ischemia underwent thrombectomy and revascularization. Complications in the nonischemic group included three patients with deep abscesses with concomitant arterial thrombosis, two with deep abscesses alone, and 10 with pseudoaneurysms. Treatment strategy in this group varied with the presenting pathology. Among the entire case series, three patients required reintervention after the initial surgery, all in individuals initially presenting with ischemia who developed recurrent thrombosis of the radial artery. There were no digital or hand amputations in this series. However, the overall in-hospital mortality in these patients was 37%, reflecting the severity of illness in this patient cohort. Three patients who were positive for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody had 100% mortality compared with those who were negative (P = .04, Fisher exact test). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients presenting with initial ischemia than in those with nonischemic complications (53% vs 20%; P = .06). Among 10 patients who presented with pseudoaneurysms, five (50%) were septic at presentation with positive blood cultures, and six (60%) had positive operating room cultures. Staphylococcus aureus was identified as the causative organism in all of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Complications of radial artery cannulation requiring surgical intervention can represent infectious and ischemic sequelae and have the potential to result in major morbidity, including digital or hand amputation and sepsis, or death. Although surgical treatment is successful and often required in these patients to treat severe hand ischemia, hemorrhage, or vascular infection, these complications tend to occur in critically ill hospitalized patients with an extremely high mortality. This must be taken into consideration when planning surgical intervention in this patient cohort. Finally, radial arterial cannulation sites should not be overlooked when searching for occult septic sources in critically ill patients.

A recommended protocol for the immediate postoperative care of lower extremity free-flap reconstructions.

The success of lower extremity microsurgical reconstructions may be compromised postoperatively secondary to several factors, including thrombosis, infection, bleeding, and edema. To address edema, surgeons may use protocols for gradually dangling and/or wrapping the affected extremity. Such protocols vary widely among surgeons and are typically based on training and/or prior experience. To that end, we distributed surveys to five plastic surgeons who are experienced in microvascular lower extremity reconstruction at five different institutions. The surveys inquired about postoperative management protocols for lower extremity free flaps with regard to positioning, compression, initiation and progression of postoperative mobilization, nonweightbearing and weightbearing ambulation, assessment of flap viability, and flap success rate. These protocols were then evaluated for similarities to create a consensus of postoperative management guidelines. Progressive periods of leg dependency and compression therapy emerged as important elements. Although the consensus protocol developed in this study is considered safe by each participant, we do not intend for these recommendations to serve as a standard of care, nor do we suggest that any one particular protocol leads to improved outcomes. However, these recommendations may serve as a guide for less experienced surgeons or those without a protocol in place.