Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 124: 108265, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771273

ABSTRACT

Substance use disorder (SUD) during pregnancy increases risks of adverse outcomes for mothers and children. Because Medicaid covers about half of all births and maternal SUD is a costly problem, describing the timing of enrollment and health care that Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women with SUDs receive is critical to understanding gaps in the timeliness and specificity of SUD diagnosis and treatment for pregnant women with SUDs. We used linked maternal and infant Medicaid claims and enrollment data and infant birth records from three states (n=72,086 mother-infant dyads) to estimate the share of sample women diagnosed with a specified SUD (e.g., opioid use disorder) before or during the birth month, with a specified SUD after the birth month, and with only an unspecified SUD diagnosed (e.g., drug use disorder complicating pregnancy). We also examined the timing of first observed Medicaid enrollment, SUD diagnosis and treatment, and maternal and infant costs. In the 24 months surrounding birth, 3.6% of women had a specified SUD diagnosis first observed before or during the birth month, 1.7% had a specified SUD diagnosis first observed after the birth month, and 6.0% had an SUD diagnosis that was not specified. Most women with a specified SUD diagnosis were enrolled in Medicaid before or early in pregnancy and initiated prenatal care in the first or second trimester, yet nearly one-third of these women received their specified SUD diagnosis after the birth month. Less than two-thirds of women with a specified SUD diagnosis received any SUD treatment during the study period (59.9% among those identified before or during the birth month and 63.1% among those observed after the birth month), and women with an unspecified SUD were about half as likely to get treatment (28.6%). Among treated women, more than two-thirds had the first observed treatment in the same month as their first observed SUD diagnosis. Findings point to a critical need for interventions as well as substantial opportunities to improve the identification of substance use-related needs and provision of treatment among women who birth in Medicaid. Changes in Medicaid and other public policy to reduce disincentives for pregnant and parenting women to report substance use during medical visits and to increase providers' abilities and motivation to equitably screen for as well as treat women with SUDs before, during, and after pregnancy could improve outcomes for mothers and their children. Improvements in SUD diagnosis would also improve prevalence estimates of specific types of SUD, which could contribute to better Medicaid policies aimed at prevention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Opioid-Related Disorders , Pregnancy Complications , Child , Female , Humans , Medicaid , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Pregnant Women , Prenatal Care , United States
2.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 39(6): 1042-1050, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32479222

ABSTRACT

The federal Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns initiative supported alternative approaches to prenatal care, enhancing service delivery through the use of birth centers, group prenatal care, and maternity care homes. Using propensity score reweighting to control for medical and social risks, we evaluated the impacts of Strong Start's models on birth outcomes and costs by comparing the experiences of Strong Start enrollees to those of Medicaid-covered women who received typical prenatal care. We found that women who received prenatal care in birth centers had lower rates of preterm and low-birthweight infants, lower rates of cesarean section, and higher rates of vaginal birth after cesarean than did the women in the comparison groups. Improved outcomes were achieved at lower costs. There were few improvements in outcomes for participants who received group prenatal care, although their costs were lower in the prenatal period, and no improvements in outcomes for participants in maternity care homes.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Premature Birth , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Medicaid , Mothers , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , United States
3.
Matern Child Nutr ; 16(3): e12968, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048455

ABSTRACT

The new millennium brought renewed attention to improving the health of women and children. In this same period, direct deaths from conflicts have declined worldwide, but civilian deaths associated with conflicts have increased. Nigeria is among the most conflict-prone countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, especially recently with the Boko Haram insurgency in the north. This paper uses two data sources, the 2013 Demographic and Health Survey for Nigeria and the Social Conflict Analysis Database, linked by geocode, to study the effect of these conflicts on infant and young child acute malnutrition (or wasting). We show a strong association in 2013 between living close to a conflict zone and acute malnutrition in Nigerian children, with larger effects for rural children than urban children. This is related to the severity of the conflict, measured both in terms of the number of conflict deaths and the length of time the child was exposed to conflict. Undoubtedly, civil conflict is limiting the future prospects of Nigerian children and the country's economic growth. In Nigeria, conflicts in the north are expected to continue with sporadic attacks and continued damaged infrastructure. Thus, Nigerian children, innocent victims of the conflict, will continue to suffer the consequences documented in this study.


Subject(s)
Armed Conflicts/statistics & numerical data , Child Nutrition Disorders/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Nigeria/epidemiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index
4.
Matern Child Health J ; 24(5): 546-551, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31897931

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Twin births have increased in prevalence. Twin births are more likely to have poorer outcomes than singleton births and are more costly. However, although Medicaid paid for approximately half of U.S. births in 2016, little is known specifically about the incidence of twin births and related costs for Medicaid beneficiaries. This paper seeks to expand the knowledge of twin births covered by Medicaid. METHODS: We obtained data for singleton (N = 115,568) and twin (N = 3775) Medicaid-covered births in selected geographic areas of four states in 2014 and 2015. States provided linked birth certificates to Medicaid claims data for mothers and infants. We compared health care utilization and Medicaid costs for twins to singletons in the same geographic areas. RESULTS: The prevalence of Medicaid twins in the selected areas of these four states was 3.2% of births, identical to the rate of twins nationwide. Two thirds of Medicaid twins were born preterm, and average gestational age was 34.8 weeks. Mothers of twins had higher rates of C-Sect. (73.6% vs. 32.0% for singletons) and of neonatal intensive care use (45.2% vs. 11.1%). The average length of delivery stay for twins was 12.3 days, vs. 4.1, and the rate of hospital readmissions was almost twice as high. The total cost for mother and infant over the prenatal, delivery, and post-natal period for a pair of twins was $48,479, over two and a half times as high as for singleton births ($18,032). However, when considering the average cost of a single twin vs. a singleton birth, the cost differential is less ($24,239 vs. $18,032, or a ratio of 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid twins are a fragile population with poorer outcomes and higher service use than singleton infants. Twins contribute substantially to the Medicaid cost of maternity and newborn care. A variety of strategies can be used to improve twin outcomes and reduce costs.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Twins/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Maternal Health Services/economics , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Pregnancy , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
5.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 195: 156-163, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maternal opioid use disorder (OUD) has serious consequences for maternal and infant health. Analysis of Medicaid enrollee data is critical, since Medicaid bears a disproportionate share of costs. METHODS: This study analyzes linked maternal and infant Medicaid claims data and infant birth records in three states in the year before and after a delivery in 2014-2015 (2013-2016) examining health, health care use, treatment, and neonatal outcomes. Diagnosis and procedure codes identify OUD and other substance use disorders (SUDs). RESULTS: In the year before and after delivery, 2.2 percent of the sample had an OUD diagnosis, and 5.9 percent had a SUD diagnosis other than OUD. Of the women with OUD, 72.8% had treatment for a SUD in the year before and after delivery, but most had none in an average enrolled month, and only 8.8% received any methadone treatment in a given month. Pregnant women with OUD had delayed and lower rates of prenatal care compared to women with other substance use disorders (SUDs). Infants of mothers with OUD did not differ from infants of mothers with other SUDs in rate of preterm or low birth weight but had higher NICU admission rates and longer birth hospitalizations. Health care costs for women with an OUD were higher than those with other SUDs. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for comprehensive, evidence-based OUD treatment integrated with maternity care. To fill critical gaps in care, workforce and infrastructure innovations can facilitate delivery of preventive and treatment services coordinated across settings.


Subject(s)
Medicaid/trends , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/diagnosis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/diagnosis , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/therapy , United States/epidemiology
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 255, 2018 04 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29625569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about how directly observed treatment (DOT) support for tuberculosis (TB) can be delivered most effectively and how DOT support can simultaneously be used to strengthen human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and control among TB patients. This study describes how DOT support by community health workers (CHWs) was used in four municipalities in the Free State province - a high TB/HIV burden, poorly-resourced setting - to provide HIV outreach, referrals, and health education for TB patients. METHODS: The study was part of a larger cross-sectional study of HIV counselling and testing (HCT) among 1101 randomly-selected TB patients registered at 40 primary health care (PHC) facilities (clinics and community health centres) across small town/rural and large town/urban settings. Univariate analysis of percentages, chi-square tests and t-tests for difference in means were used to describe differences between the types of TB treatment support and patient characteristics, as well as the types of - and patient satisfaction with - HIV information and referrals received from various types of treatment supporters including home-based DOT supporters, clinic-based DOT supporters or support from family/friends/employers. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict the likelihood of not having receiving home-based DOT and of never having received HIV counselling. The independent variables include poverty-related health and socio-economic risk factors for poor outcomes. Statistical significance is shown using a 95% confidence interval and a 0.05 p-value. RESULTS: Despite the fact that DOT support for all TB patients was the goal of South African health policy at the time (2012), most TB patients were not receiving formal DOT support. Only 155 (14.1%) were receiving home-based DOT, while 114 (10.4%) received clinic-based DOT. TB patients receiving home-based DOT reported higher rates of HIV counselling than other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Public health providers should train DOT supporters to provide HIV prevention and target DOT to those at greatest risk of HIV, particularly those at greatest socio-economic risk.


Subject(s)
Directly Observed Therapy/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Coinfection/prevention & control , Community Health Services/methods , Community Health Services/standards , Community Health Workers/statistics & numerical data , Counseling , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Female , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Rural Health/standards , South Africa , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Urban Health/standards
7.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 20(3): 711-716, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28434135

ABSTRACT

Son preference has existed for centuries in many cultures and societies. In some Asian countries, including China and India, the sex ratio at birth (SRB, number of male infants divided by number of female infants times 100) is elevated above the worldwide biological norm of about 105. We investigate whether this ratio is elevated in the U.S. for immigrant women. We analyze U.S. birth certificates for 2004-2013 and categorize births by mother's and father's race/ethnicity; mother's place of birth, and birth order of the child. The SRB is elevated for two groups of women: Chinese women born in China for children of birth order 2 and higher, and Indian women born in India for children of birth order 3 and higher. The SRB is not elevated for Chinese and Indian women born in the U.S., nor for Mexican women, Black women, nor White women, regardless of place of birth. The race/ethnicity of the child's father does not appear to be a strong factor in the SRB. In the early twenty-first century the elevated SRB for Chinese and Indian women born in China and India respectively suggests sex selection for higher order births in the U.S.


Subject(s)
Birth Certificates , Emigrants and Immigrants , Sex Ratio , Asia/ethnology , Female , Gravidity , Humans , India/ethnology , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mexico/ethnology , Pregnancy , United States
8.
Acad Pediatr ; 15(3 Suppl): S19-27, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25906958

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evolution of Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and Medicaid programs after passage of the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA), focusing on policies affecting eligibility, enrollment, renewal, benefits, access to care, cost sharing, and preparation for health care reform. METHODS: Case studies were conducted in 10 states during 2012-which included key informant interviews and consumer focus groups-and a national survey of state CHIP program administrators was conducted in early 2013. RESULTS: Despite the recession that persisted during much of the study period, many states expanded children's coverage by raising upper income eligibility limits or by covering new groups made eligible by CHIPRA. Simplifying rules and procedures for enrollment and renewal continued to be a major priority for CHIP and Medicaid, and CHIPRA played a direct role in spurring innovation. CHIPRA's outreach grants played an important role in supporting and supplementing state outreach efforts. Important legacies of CHIPRA are the law's mandatory requirements for comprehensive dental benefits coverage and mental health parity for all types of CHIP programs. Although most states already offered generous coverage of these benefits, the mandate may have protected them from cuts during the economic downturn. Federal Maintenance of Effort rules were a crucial protection for CHIP, especially during the recession when state budget shortfalls could have led to program cuts. CONCLUSIONS: Passage of the Affordable Care Act has raised questions surrounding the future role of CHIP in a reformed health care system. A growing number of stakeholders have recommended a 2-year extension of federal CHIP funding to allow complex transition issues to be resolved.


Subject(s)
Children's Health Insurance Program/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Sharing , Eligibility Determination , Health Policy , Health Services Accessibility , Insurance Benefits , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Poverty , Health Care Reform , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , United States
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25250198

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Medicaid pays for about half the births in the United States, at very high cost. Compared to usual obstetrical care, care by midwives at a birth center could reduce costs to the Medicaid program. This study draws on information from a previous study of the outcomes of birth center care to determine whether such care reduces Medicaid costs for low income women. METHODS: The study uses results from a study of maternal and infant outcomes at the Family Health and Birth Center in Washington, D.C. Costs to Medicaid are derived from birth center data and from other national sources of the cost of obstetrical care. RESULTS: We estimate that birth center care could save an average of $1,163 per birth (2008 constant dollars), or $11.6 million per 10,000 births per year. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid is the leading payer for maternity services. As Medicaid faces continuing cost increases and budget constraints, policy makers should consider a larger role for midwives and birth centers in maternity care for low-risk Medicaid pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Birthing Centers/economics , Cost Savings/economics , Maternal-Child Nursing/economics , Medicaid/economics , Midwifery/economics , Poverty/economics , Adult , Birthing Centers/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal-Child Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , United States , Young Adult
10.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 10: E198, 2013 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286272

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Older adults have higher rates of emergency department use than do younger adults, and the number of centenarians is expected to increase. The objective of this study was to examine centenarians' use of the emergency department in the United States, including diagnoses, charges, and disposition. METHODS: The 2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality provided encounter-level data on emergency department visits and weights for producing nationwide estimates. From this data set, we collected patient characteristics including age, sex, primary diagnosis, and disposition. We used χ(2) tests and t tests to test for significant differences among people aged 80 to 89, 90 to 99, and 100 years or older. RESULTS: Centenarians had a lower rate of emergency department use than those aged 90 to 99 (736 per 1,000 vs 950 per 1,000; P < .05). We found no significant difference in use between centenarians and those aged 80 to 89. The most common diagnoses for centenarians were superficial injuries (5.8% of visits), pneumonia (5.1%), and urinary tract infections (5.1%). Centenarians were more likely to visit the emergency department for fall-related injuries (21.5%) than those aged 80 to 89 (14.1%; P < .05) and 90 to 99 (18.7%; P < .05). Centenarians were more likely to die in the emergency department (2.0%) than were those aged 80 to 89 (0.6%; P < .05) and 90 to 99 (0.7%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Centenarians in emergency departments in the United States have different diagnoses, conditions, and outcomes than other older Americans.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Female , Health Services for the Aged , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology
11.
Health Serv Res ; 48(5): 1750-68, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23586867

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of a midwifery model of care delivered in a freestanding birth center on maternal and infant outcomes when compared with conventional care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Birth certificate data for women who gave birth in Washington D.C. and D.C. residents who gave birth in other jurisdictions. STUDY DESIGN: Using propensity score modeling and instrumental variable analysis, we compare maternal and infant outcomes among women who receive prenatal care from birth center midwives and women who receive usual care. We match on observable characteristics available on the birth certificate, and we use distance to the birth center as an instrument. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Birth certificate data from 2005 to 2008. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Women who receive birth center care are less likely to have a C-section, more likely to carry to term, and are more likely to deliver on a weekend, suggesting less intervention overall. While less consistent, findings also suggest improved infant outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: For women without medical complications who are able to be served in either setting, our findings suggest that midwife-directed prenatal and labor care results in equal or improved maternal and infant outcomes.


Subject(s)
Birthing Centers , Midwifery/methods , Obstetrics , Prenatal Care/standards , Adult , Birth Certificates , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Propensity Score , Workforce
12.
J Healthc Qual ; 35(1): 21-9, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22092988

ABSTRACT

This was an evaluation of the efforts of five hospitals that participated in a collaborative aimed at improving patient flow and reducing emergency department (ED) crowding. Interviews with hospital implementation team members were conducted at two separate times, and multivariate linear regression models and bivariate logistic models were constructed to assess changes in ED length of stay (LOS) and left without being seen (LWBS). By the end of the collaborative, four of the five hospitals had at least one fully implemented improvement strategy. Those hospitals experienced modest improvements in patient flow: a hospital that implemented front-end improvements and devoted additional resources to fast track had a 51-min reduction in ED LOS, another that implemented only front-end improvements had a 9-min reduction in LOS, a third hospital that improved communication between the ED and inpatient units to facilitate admissions decreased LWBS from 0.6% to 0.4%, and a fourth hospital reduced LOS by 59 min for mid-acuity patients by establishing a new care process for them. Results suggest that relatively small changes may lead to improvements in measures of patient flow that are modest, at best.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Length of Stay/trends , Patient Admission/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cooperative Behavior , Crowding , Efficiency, Organizational , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Innovation , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/trends , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/standards , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
13.
Med Care Res Rev ; 69(4): 372-96, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22451618

ABSTRACT

This article reviews findings from 38 rigorous studies published in the peer-reviewed literature of the impact of the Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) expansions on children. There is strong evidence for increases in enrollment in public programs and reductions in uninsurance following eligibility expansions. Medicaid enrollment continued to increase during the CHIP era (a "spillover effect"). Evidence for improved access to and use of services, particularly for dental care, is also very strong. There are fewer studies of health status impacts, and the evidence is mixed. There is a very wide range in the size of effects estimated in the studies reviewed because of the methods used and the populations studied. The review identifies several important research gaps on this topic, particularly the small number of studies of the effects on health status. Both research methods and findings from the child expansions can provide insights for evaluating the coming expansions for adults under the Affordable Care Act.


Subject(s)
Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Status , Humans , Infant , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/organization & administration , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organization & administration , United States
14.
Am J Public Health ; 100(12): 2500-6, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21068421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We investigated trends in national childhood mortality, racial disparities in child mortality, and the effect of Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) eligibility expansions on child mortality. METHODS: We analyzed child mortality by state, race, and age using the National Center for Health Statistics' multiple cause of death files over 20 years, from 1985 to 2004. RESULTS: Child mortality continued to decline in the United States, but racial disparities in mortality remained. Declines in child mortality (ages 1-17 years) were substantial for both natural (disease-related) and external (injuries, homicide, and suicide) causes for children of all races/ethnicities, although Black-White mortality ratios remained unchanged during the study period. Expanded Medicaid and SCHIP eligibility was significantly related to the decline in external-cause mortality; the relationship between natural-cause mortality and Medicaid or SCHIP eligibility remains unclear. Eligibility expansions did not affect relative racial disparities in child mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study provides some evidence that public insurance expansions reduce child mortality, future research is needed on the effect of new health insurance on child health and on factors causing relative racial disparities.


Subject(s)
Black People/statistics & numerical data , Child Mortality/trends , Insurance Coverage , Medicaid , State Health Plans , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child Health Services/economics , Child, Preschool , Eligibility Determination , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Infant , United States/epidemiology , United States/ethnology
15.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 21(2 Suppl): 109-24, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20453380

ABSTRACT

Three California counties (Los Angeles, San Mateo, and Santa Clara) expanded health insurance coverage for undocumented children and some higher income children not covered by Medi-Cal (Medicaid) or Healthy Families (SCHIP). This paper presents findings from evaluations of all three programs. Results consistently showed that health insurance enrollment increased access to and use of medical and dental care, and reduced unmet need for those services. After one year of enrollment the programs also improved the health status of children, including reducing the percentage of children who missed school due to health.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Poverty , Absenteeism , Adolescent , California , Child , Child Health Services/economics , Child, Preschool , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Infant , Local Government , Los Angeles , Program Evaluation
16.
Int J Integr Care ; 8: e02, 2008 Feb 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18317560

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In 2002 the Republika Srpska of Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted goals for reducing the burden of chronic disease through a new screening program in its publicly funded health centers ("Dom Zdravljas"). This study evaluated the first year of program implementation. METHODS: The evaluation used in-depth interviews with 25 key stakeholders and in-person interviews with 1004 citizens. RESULTS: We found that many health care providers and citizens were unaware of the program. In addition, there was inadequate financing for the program, because the Health Insurance Fund does not collect revenue for uninsured citizens, more than 20 per cent of the population. CONCLUSION: We recommend improved co-ordination among public and private organizations involved in implementation; increased promotion of the program with health care providers and citizens; and increased financial resources for providing screening for uninsured citizens.

17.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 27(2): 550-9, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18332513

ABSTRACT

A large number of California counties have recently taken bold steps to extend health insurance to all poor and near-poor children through county-based Children's Health Initiatives. One initiative, the Los Angeles Healthy Kids program, extends coverage to uninsured children in families with incomes below 300 percent of the federal poverty level who are ineligible for Medi-Cal (California Medicaid) and Healthy Families (its State Children's Health Insurance Program). A four-year evaluation of Healthy Kids finds that the program has improved access for more than 40,000, most of whom are immigrant Latino children, who have almost no access to employer coverage. However, sustaining this effective program has proved to be challenging.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , Healthy People Programs/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Child , Female , Healthy People Programs/trends , Humans , Los Angeles , Male
18.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 19(1): 237-47, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18263999

ABSTRACT

This study examines racial/ethnic disparities in children's mental health and the receipt of mental health services, and whether those disparities differ between urban and rural areas. We find no significant difference between racial/ethnic groups in the prevalence of child mental health problems in either urban or rural areas. However, there are disparities in the use of mental health services. Hispanic children and Black children in urban areas receive less mental health care than their White counterparts, and the disparity persists for Hispanic children in rural areas, even after controlling for other relevant factors. Initiatives to improve access to mental health care for racial/ethnic minorities should recognize these disparities, and address the lack of culturally appropriate services in both urban and rural areas. In addition, outreach should raise awareness among parents, teachers, and other community members concerning the need for mental health services for minority children.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups , Residence Characteristics , Adolescent , Child , Female , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Parents , Prevalence , Rural Population , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population
19.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 35(3): 220-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18259853

ABSTRACT

Mental health care is a critical component of Medicaid for children. This study used summary tables drawn from the 1999 Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) files, the first available Medicaid data for the entire US, to examine fee-for-service Medicaid in 23 selected states. Data show that 9% of children and youth (ages 0-21) had a mental health-related diagnosis on a claim, varying from 5% to 17% across the states. The proportion increased with age, and was higher for boys. Over half of those diagnosed received psychotropic medication, and approximately 7% had an inpatient psychiatric admission during the year. Mental health costs accounted for 26.5% of total fee-for-service Medicaid expenditures, varying from 14% to 61% depending on the state.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases as Topic , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mental Disorders , United States
20.
Health Serv Res ; 42(2): 867-89, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17362222

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether providing health insurance coverage to undocumented children affects the health of those children. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The data come from a survey of 1235 parents of enrollees in the new insurance program ("Healthy Kids") in Santa Clara County, California. The survey was conducted from August 2003 to July 2004. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a group of children insured for one year as the study group (N=626) and a group of newly insured children as the comparison group (N=609). Regression analysis is used to adjust for differences in the groups according to a range of characteristics. DATA COLLECTION: Parents were interviewed by telephone in either English or Spanish (most responded in Spanish). The response rate was 89 percent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The study group-who were children continuously insured by Healthy Kids for one year-were significantly less likely to be in fair/poor health and to have functional impairments than the comparison group of newly insured children (15.9 percent versus 28.5 percent and 4.5 percent versus 8.4 percent, respectively). Impacts were largest among children who enrolled for a specific medical reason (such as an illness or injury); indeed, the impact on functional limitations was evident only for this subgroup. The study group also had fewer missed school days than the comparison group, but the difference was significant only among children who did not enroll for a medical reason. CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance coverage of undocumented children in Santa Clara County was associated with significant improvements in children's health status. The size of this association could be overstated, since the comparison sample included some children who enrolled because of an illness or other temporary health problem that would have improved even without insurance coverage. However, even after limiting the study sample to children who did not enroll for a medical reason, a significant association remained between children's reported health and their health coverage. We thus cautiously conclude that Healthy Kids had a favorable impact on children's health.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Health Status , Insurance Coverage/organization & administration , Medical Assistance/organization & administration , Poverty , Absenteeism , Adolescent , California , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...