Similar Recovery Rate for Patients Aged between 50 and 89 Years That Go Home on the Surgery Day and Self-Administer Their Rehabilitation after Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: for kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it was unknown whether 'the pace of recovery' at six weeks was different for patients with ages ranging between 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89 years who were discharged on the surgery day and self-administered their rehabilitation. METHODS: a single surgeon treated 206 consecutive patients with a KA-designed femoral component and an insert with a medial ball-in-socket, lateral flat articulation, and PCL retention. Each filled out preoperative and six-week Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Function Score (KFS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) questionnaires. The six-week minus preoperative value indicated improvement. RESULTS: between age cohorts, the improvement was not different (p = 0.2319 to 0.9888). The mean improvement/six-week postoperative value was 6°/-2° for knee extension, 0°/119° for knee flexion, 7/31 for the OKS, 39/96 for the KSS, 7/64 for the KFS, and 13/62 for the KOOS. The 30-day hospital readmission rate was 1%. CONCLUSION: surgeons who perform KA TKA can counsel 50 to 89-year-old patients that they can be safely discharged home on the surgery day with a low risk of readmission and can achieve better function at six weeks than preoperatively when performing exercises without a physical therapist.

Correcting for asymmetry of the proximal tibial epiphysis is warranted to determine postoperative alignment deviations in kinematic alignment from planned alignment of the tibial component on the native tibia.

BACKGROUND: In total knee arthroplasty, unrestricted kinematic alignment aims to restore pre-arthritic lower limb alignment and joint lines. Joint line orientations of the contralateral healthy proximal tibia might be used to evaluate accuracy of tibial component alignment post-operatively if asymmetry is minimal. Our objective was to evaluate left-to-right asymmetry of the proximal tibial epiphysis in posterior tibial slope and varus-valgus orientation as related to unrestricted kinematic alignment principles. METHODS: High resolution CT images (0.5 mm slice thickness) were acquired from bilateral lower limbs of 11 skeletally mature subjects with no skeletal abnormalities. Images were segmented to generate 3D tibia models. Asymmetry was quantified by differences in orientations required to shape-match the proximal epiphysis of the mirror 3D tibia model to the proximal epiphysis of the contralateral 3D tibia model. FINDINGS: Systematic and random differences (i.e. mean ± standard deviation) in tibial slope and varus-valgus orientation were - 0.8° ± 1.2° and - 0.2° ± 0.8°, respectively. Ninety five percent confidence intervals on the means included 0° indicating that systematic differences were minimal. INTERPRETATION: Since random differences due to asymmetry are substantial in relation to random surgical deviations from pre-arthritic joint lines previously reported, post-operative computer tomograms of the contralateral healthy tibia should not be used to directly assess accuracy of tibial component alignment on a group level without correcting for differences in tibial slope and varus-valgus orientation due to asymmetry.

Risk of tibial baseplate loosening is low in patients following unrestricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty using a cruciate-retaining medial conforming insert: A study using radiostereometric analysis at 2 years.

PURPOSE: Assessing the risk of tibial baseplate loosening in patients after unrestricted kinematically aligned (unKA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a medially conforming insert is important because baseplates generally are aligned in varus which has been linked to an increased incidence of aseptic loosening following mechanically aligned TKA. Two limits that indicate long-term stability in patients are a change in maximum total point motion between 1 and 2 years (ΔMTPM) < 0.2 mm and anterior tilt at 2 years < 0.8°. The purposes were to determine: (1) the number of patients with ΔMTPM > 0.2 mm, (2) the number of patients with anterior tilt > 0.8° and (3) whether increased varus baseplate and limb alignment were associated with increased migration. METHODS: Thirty-five patients underwent cemented, caliper-verified, unKA TKA using a medially conforming tibial insert with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention. Biplanar radiographs acquired on the day of surgery and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were processed with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) software to determine migration and the number of patients with migration above the two stability limits. Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) and posterior slope angle (PSA) were analyzed for an association with migration in six degrees of freedom and in MTPM. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 patients were available for analysis at 2 years. One patient exhibited ΔMTPM > 0.2 mm. The same patient exhibited anterior tilt > 0.8°. Varus rotation (p = 0.048, r ≤ 0.34) and medial translation (p = 0.0273, r ≤ 0.29) increased with increased varus baseplate alignment. CONCLUSION: The results indicate low risk of long-term baseplate loosening in patients. Although varus rotation and medial translation increased with increased varus baseplate alignment, the magnitudes of the migrations were minimal and did not increase ΔMTPM and anterior tilt. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic prospective cohort study.

Differences in Trochlear Morphology of a New Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment from a Mechanical Alignment Design.

Because kinematic alignment (KA) aligns femoral components in greater valgus and with less external rotation than mechanical alignment (MA), the trochlear groove of an MA design used in KA is medialized, which can lead to complications. Hence, a KA design has emerged. In this study, our primary objective was to quantify differences in trochlear morphology between the KA design and the MA design from which the KA design evolved. The KA and MA designs were aligned in KA on ten 3D femur-cartilage models. Dependent variables describing the morphology of the trochlea along the anterior flange, which extends proximal to the native trochlea, and along the arc length of the native trochlea, were determined, as was flange coverage. Along the anterior flange, the KA groove was significantly lateral proximally by 10 mm and was significantly wider proximally by 5 mm compared to the MA design (p < 0.0001). Along the arc length of the native trochlea, the KA groove was significantly lateral to the MA design by 4.3 mm proximally (p ≤ 0.0001) and was significantly wider proximally by 19 mm than the MA design. The KA design reduced lateral under-coverage of the flange from 4 mm to 2 mm (p < 0.0001). The KA design potentially mitigates risk of patellofemoral complications by lateralizing and widening the groove to avoid medializing the patella for wide variations in the lateral distal femoral angle, and by widening the flange laterally to reduce under-coverage. This information enables clinicians to make informed decisions regarding use of the KA design.

Reoperation, Implant Survival, and Clinical Outcome After Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Concise Clinical Follow-Up at 16 Years.

BACKGROUND: The preceding study reported a 10-year follow-up of 222 kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in 217 patients in 2007. As 35% of tibial components and 8% of limbs were in >3° varus, the present study assessed whether this adversely affected reoperation, implant survival, and function at 16 years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon's private practice database to determine the patients who underwent reoperation as well as Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score. RESULTS: There were 7 patients who had a major reoperation (revision of a loose tibial component [n = 2], and revision of well-fixed component due to stiffness [n = 1], patella instability [n = 1], pain [n = 1], and infection [n = 2]). There were 5 who had a minor reoperation that retained the components, and 91 patients (94 TKAs) died. Implant survivorship was 93% using reoperation for any reason as the endpoint. The median (interquartile range) Forgotten Joint and Oxford Knee scores were 88 (57 to 100) and 45 (39 to 48) points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The kinematically aligned TKA had a 7% reoperation rate at 16 years follow-up, comparable to or lower than reports of mechanically aligned TKA, which supports the concept of the unrestricted version of kinematic alignment in which the patient's prearthritic alignment is fully restored regardless of deformity.

A new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention closely restores native knee tibial rotation after unrestricted kinematic alignment.

PURPOSE: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention, the medial and lateral insert conformity that restores in vivo native (i.e., healthy) knee tibial rotation and high function without causing stiffness is unknown. The purpose was to determine whether a ball-in-socket (B-in-S) medially conforming (MC) and flat lateral insert implanted with unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA and PCL retention restores tibial rotation to native. METHODS: One group of 25 patients underwent unrestricted KA TKA with manual instruments. Another group of 25 patients had native knees. Single-plane fluoroscopy imaged each knee while patients performed step-up and chair rise activities. Following 3D model-to-2D image registration, anterior-posterior (A-P) positions of the femoral condyles were determined. Changes in A-P positions with flexion were used to determine tibial rotation. RESULTS: At maximum flexion, mean tibial rotations of KA TKA knees were comparable to native knees (Step up: 12.3° ± 4.4° vs. 13.1° ± 12.0°, p = 0.783; Chair Rise: 12.7° ± 6.2° vs. 12.6° ± 9.5º, p = 0.941). However, paths of rotation differed in that screw home motion was less evident in KA TKA knees. At 8 months follow-up, the median Forgotten Joint Score was 69 points (range 65 to 85), the median Oxford Knee Score was 43 points (range 40 to 46), and mean knee flexion was 127º ± 8°. CONCLUSIONS: The ball-in-socket medial, flat lateral insert and PCL retention implanted with unrestricted KA TKA restored in vivo native knee tibial rotation at maximum flexion for each activity and high function without stiffness. Providing high A-P stability, this implant design might benefit patients desiring to return to demanding work and recreational activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic - Level II.

Better forgotten joint scores when the angle of the prosthetic trochlea is lateral to the quadriceps vector in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to analyze unrestricted kinematic alignment (unKA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the frequency of medial deviation of the prosthetic trochlear angle (PTA) of the femoral component relative to the quadriceps vector (QV) that terminates at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), and whether patients with medial deviation had a worse Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) relative to those with lateral deviation. The secondary aim was to determine the frequency of medial deviation for mechanical alignment (MA) TKA simulations. METHODS: From a database of a single surgeon, the study extracted de-identified data on 147 patients with a CT scanogram showing the pelvis and AIIS, a limb with an unKA TKA, and a native (i.e., healthy) opposite limb. On the scanogram, an examiner, blinded to the PROMs, measured the PTA-QV angle on the unKA TKA and on the opposite limb simulated MA TKA by drawing the PTA at 6° valgus relative to the femoral mechanical axis and measuring the PTA-QV angle. RESULTS: Medial deviation of the PTA occurred in 86% of patients with unKA TKA, and the 126 with medial deviation had a 17/1 point worse median FJS/OKS than the 21 with lateral deviation at a mean follow-up of 47 ± 8 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0053). In addition, 21%, 17%, and 8% of MA TKA had medial deviation after radiographic simulation using reported surgical errors for manual, patient-specific, and robotic instrumentation, respectively. CONCLUSION: In most patients with unKA TKA and a smaller proportion with MA TKA, a PTA of 6° valgus was medial to the QV, which, by excluding the patient's Q-angle, might alter patellofemoral kinematics like an incorrectly oriented trochleoplasty. The 17-point worse FJS in the patients with an unKA TKA and medial deviation of the PTA suggests the surgical target should be to orient the PTA lateral to the QV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A Torn or Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Does Not Adversely Affect Clinical Outcome Scores and the Incidence of Reoperation After Unrestricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There are no reports as to whether the condition of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adversely affects the 2 to 3 year function and reoperation risk of a kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and an intermediate medial conforming (MC) insert. METHODS: A single surgeon's prospective database query identified 418 consecutive primary TKAs performed between January 2019 and December 2019. The surgeon recorded the ACL condition in the operative note. Patients filled out the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement at the final follow-up. There were 299 patients with an intact ACL, 99 with a torn ACL, and 20 with a reconstructed ACL. The mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 20 to 45). RESULTS: The median FJS, OKS, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) of the reconstructed/torn/intact KA TKAs were 90/79/67, 47/44/43, and 92/88/80 points, respectively. The median OKS and KOOS of the reconstructed ACL cohort were 4 and 11 points higher than in the intact ACL cohort (P = .003, .04). One patient who had a reconstructed ACL underwent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness. The 5 reoperations in the intact ACL cohort were for instability (n = 2), revision after failed MUA for stiffness (n = 2), and infection (n = 1). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients who have a torn and reconstructed ACL can expect high function and a low risk of reoperation comparable to patients who have an intact ACL when treated with unrestricted, caliper-verified KA, PCL retention, and an intermediate MC insert.

Ball-in-socket medial conformity with posterior cruciate ligament retention neither limits internal tibial rotation and knee flexion nor lowers clinical outcome scores after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: For a new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket (B-in-S) medial conformity (MC), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention, and flat lateral articular surface (B-in-S MC + PCL), this study determined whether internal tibial rotation and knee flexion were limited and clinical outcome scores were lower during weight-bearing activities relative to an insert with intermediate (I) (i.e., less than ball-in-socket) medial conformity (I MC + PCL). METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated with bilateral unrestricted, caliper-verified kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with an I MC + PCL insert and B-in-S MC + PCL insert in opposite knees. Each patient performed weight-bearing deep knee bend, step up, and chair rise under single-plane fluoroscopy. Analysis following 3D model-to-2D image registration determined internal tibial rotation. For each TKA, knee flexion was measured and patients completed clinical outcome scoring questionnaires. RESULTS: Internal tibial rotation did not differ between conformities during chair rise and step up (p = 0.3419 and 0.1030, respectively). During deep knee bend, internal tibial rotation between 90° and maximum flexion was 3° greater in the B-in-S MC + PCL group (18° vs 15°) (p = 0.0290). Mean knee flexion (p = 0.3115) and median Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (p = 0.2100, 0.2154, and 0.4542, respectively) did not differ between conformities. CONCLUSION: An insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity, which maximizes anteroposterior (AP) stability, did not limit internal tibial rotation and knee flexion and did not lower patient-reported outcomes when implanted with unrestricted caliper-verified KA and PCL retention. The high AP stability provided by the medial ball-in-socket might interest those surgeons exploring the treatment of the active patient with a desire to return to high-level and athletic activities.

Correcting for distal femoral asymmetry is necessary to determine postoperative alignment deviations from planned alignment of the femoral component.

BACKGROUND: One method for assessing the accuracy of manual, patient-specific, navigational, and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) instrumentation is to use a post-operative computer tomogram and determine the deviation of the femoral component alignment relative to the planned alignment in the native (i.e. healthy) contralateral distal femoral epiphysis. However, side-to-side asymmetry might introduce errors which inflate alignment deviations. This study quantified asymmetry in the distal femoral epiphysis. METHODS: High resolution CT images (0.5 mm slice thickness) were acquired from bilateral lower limb specimens of 13 skeletally mature subjects with no skeletal abnormalities. Images were segmented to generate 3D femur models. Asymmetry was quantified by differences in positions and orientations required to shape-match the distal epiphysis of the mirror 3D femur model to the distal epiphysis of the contralateral 3D femur model. RESULTS: Asymmetry was due to random rather than systematic differences. Random differences (i.e. standard deviations) in proximal-distal (P-D) and anterior-posterior (A-P) positions were 1.1 mm and in varus-valgus (V-V) and internal-external (I-E) orientations were 0.9° and 1.3°, respectively. These represented substantial relative errors of up to 50 % in previously reported overall alignment deviations. CONCLUSIONS: Although small in an absolute sense, asymmetry of the distal femur epiphysis introduced substantial relative errors when assessing accuracy of femoral component alignment in TKA. When post-operative computer tomograms are used to assess the accuracy of manual, patient specific, navigational, and robotic-assisted TKA instrumentation, the overall deviation should be corrected for asymmetry to better indicate the accuracy of the surgical technique.

Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rationale, Targets, Accuracy, Balancing, Implant Survival, and Outcomes.

Peer-reviewed studies published up to May 2022 are used to provide a comprehensive understanding of unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. The intent is to cultivate the curiosity of those interested in this method of personalized alignment. The rationale of unrestricted kinematic alignment is to set the femoral and tibial components coincident with the patient's prearthritic joint lines, restore the femoral and tibial phenotypes, and coalign the three kinematic axes of the components with those of the knee. The surgical technique, learning curve, and accuracy of performing kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with a caliper and company manufactured manual instrumentation should be explored and compared with robotic instrumentation. Kinematic alignment restores the native knee's medial and lateral tibial compartment forces, which mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty cannot do even after ligament release. In addition, insert conformity plays a role in restoring native tibiofemoral kinematics. A literature review of clinical outcomes, long-term durability, and the risk of varus tibial component failure and patellofemoral instability shows unrestricted kinematic alignment has comparable if not superior results when compared with mechanical alignment.

More passive internal tibial rotation with posterior cruciate ligament retention than with excision in a medial pivot TKA implanted with unrestricted caliper verified kinematic alignment.

PURPOSE: Excision of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is recommended when implanting a medial pivot (MP) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce the risk of limiting flexion by over-tensioning the flexion space. The present study determined whether PCL retention (1) limits internal tibial rotation and (2) causes anterior lift-off of the insert in 90° flexion after implantation of an MP design with unrestricted caliper verified kinematic alignment (KA). METHODS: Four surgeons implanted an MP TKA design with medial ball-in-socket and lateral flat tibial insert in ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. Before and after PCL excision, trial inserts with medial goniometric markings measured the angular I-E tibial orientation relative to the trial femoral component's medial condyle in extension and at 90° flexion, and the surgeon recorded the occurrence of anterior lift-off of the insert at 90° flexion. RESULTS: PCL retention resulted in greater internal tibial rotation than PCL excision, with mean values of 15° vs 7° degrees from maximum extension to 90° flexion, respectively (p < 0.0007). At 90° flexion, no TKAs with PCL retention and one TKA with PCL excision had anterior lift-off of the insert (N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study of ten cadaveric knees showed that PCL retention restored more passive internal tibial rotation than PCL excision with a negligible risk of anterior lift-off. However, in vivo analysis from multiple authors with a larger sample size is required to recommend PCL retention with an MP TKA design implanted with unrestricted caliper verified KA.

Adjusting Insert Thickness and Tibial Slope Do Not Correct Internal Tibial Rotation Loss Caused by PCL Resection: In Vitro Study of a Medial Constraint TKA Implanted with Unrestricted Calipered Kinematic Alignment.

Most medial stabilized (MS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants recommend excision of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), which eliminates the ligament's tension effect on the tibia that drives tibial rotation and compromises passive internal tibial rotation in flexion. Whether increasing the insert thickness and reducing the posterior tibial slope corrects the loss of rotation without extension loss and undesirable anterior lift-off of the insert is unknown. In 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, an MS design with a medial ball-in-socket (i.e., spherical joint) and lateral flat insert was implanted with unrestricted calipered kinematic alignment (KA) and PCL retention. Trial inserts with goniometric markings measured the internal-external orientation relative to the femoral component's medial condyle at maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion. After PCL excision, these measurements were repeated with the same insert, a 1 mm thicker insert, and a 2- and 4-mm shim under the posterior tibial baseplate to reduce the tibial slope. Internal tibial rotation from maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion was 15 degrees with PCL retention and 7 degrees with PCL excision (p < 0.000). With a 1 mm thicker insert, internal rotation was 8 degrees (p < 0.000), and four TKAs lost extension. With a 2 mm shim, internal rotation was 9 degrees (p = 0.001) and two TKAs lost extension. With a 4 mm shim, internal rotation was 10 degrees (p = 0.002) and five TKAs lost extension and three had anterior lift-off. The methods of inserting a 1 mm thicker insert and reducing the posterior slope did not correct the loss of internal tibial rotation after PCL excision and caused extension loss and anterior lift-off in several knees. PCL retention should be considered when using unrestricted calipered KA and implanting a medial ball-in-socket and lateral flat insert TKA design, so the progression of internal tibial rotation and coupled reduction in Q-angle throughout flexion matches the native knee, optimizing the retinacular ligaments' tension and patellofemoral tracking.

The posterolateral upslope of a low-conforming insert blocks the medial pivot during a deep knee bend in TKA: a comparative analysis of two implants with different insert conformities.

PURPOSE: Tibial insert conformity in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of interest due to the potential effect on tibiofemoral kinematics. This study determined differences in anterior-posterior movements of the femoral condyles, pivot locations, and internal tibial rotation in different arcs of flexion for two implants with different insert conformities in kinematically aligned TKA. METHODS: Twenty-five patients treated with a medial and lateral low-conforming, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining (LC CR) implant followed by a medial ball-in-socket and flat, lateral PCL sacrificing (B-in-S CS) implant in the contralateral knee underwent single-plane fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend. Analysis following 3D-to-2D image registration determined tibiofemoral kinematics and patients completed validated outcome scores for both knees. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of 1.6 ± 0.4 years for the knee with the B-in-S CS implant was shorter than the 2.7 ± 1.2 years for the LC CR implant. From 0º to 30º of flexion, a medial pivot occurred with the tibia rotating internally approximately 5º with both implants. From 30º to 90º, the pivot remained medial and internal rotation increased to 10º with the B-in-S CS implant. In contrast, neither femoral condyle moved more than 1 mm with the LC CR implant from 30º to 60º, but from 60º to 90º degrees, a lateral pivot occurred and internal rotation increased. Internal rotation of the tibia on the femur from 0° to maximum flexion occurred about a medial pivot similar to the native knee for the B-in-S CS implant and was 4.5° greater than that of the LC CR implant (10.4° vs 5.9°). There was no difference in the median patient-reported outcome scores between implant designs. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial insert conformity is a primary determinant of a medial or lateral pivot during a deep knee bend. One explanation for the transition from a medial to lateral pivot between 30º and 60º with the LC CR implant is the chock-block effect of the insert's posterolateral upslope which impedes posterior movement of the lateral femoral condyle. Because there is no posterolateral upslope in the insert of the B-in-S CS implant, the tibia pivots medially throughout flexion similar to the native knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Posterior rim loading of a low-conforming tibial insert in unrestricted kinematic alignment is caused by rotational alignment of an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment.

PURPOSE: Because different targets are used for internal-external rotation, an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment may lead to under-coverage and concomitant posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment following unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA. Recognizing that such loading can lead to premature wear and/or subsidence, our aim was to determine the cause(s) so that occurrence could be remedied. Our hypothesis was that baseplate design features such as asymmetric shape when aligned in KA would consistently contribute to posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment. METHODS: Based on analysis of fluoroscopic images of 50 patients performing dynamic, weight bearing deep knee bend and step up and of postoperative CT images, five possible causes were investigated. Causes included internal rotation of the baseplate when positioned in KA; posterior position of the lateral femoral condyle at extension; internal tibial rotation with flexion; internal rotational deviation of the baseplate from the KA rotation target; and posterior slope. RESULTS: The incidence of posterior rim loading was 18% (9 of 50 patients). When positioned in KA, the asymmetric baseplate left 15% versus 10% of the AP depth of the lateral compartment uncovered posteriorly for posterior rim loading and non-posterior rim loading groups, respectively (p = 0.009). The lateral femoral condyle at extension was more posterior by 4 mm for the posterior rim loading group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment was caused in part by the asymmetric design of the tibial baseplate designed for mechanical alignment which was internally rotated when positioned in KA thus under-covering a substantial percentage of the posterior lateral tibia. This highlights the need for new, asymmetric baseplates designed to maximize coverage when used in KA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Low tibial baseplate migration 1 year after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty using a medial conforming implant design.

PURPOSE: Varus alignment of the tibial baseplate and limb > 3° might adversely affect baseplate fixation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially for unrestricted kinematically aligned (KA) TKA which aligns a majority of baseplates in varus. The purposes of this study were to determine whether baseplate migration at 1 year (1) was significantly less than a stability limit of 0.5 mm, (2) increased over time, and (3) was related to varus alignment of the baseplate and limb after unrestricted KA TKA. METHODS: Thirty-five patients underwent unrestricted KA TKA using a fixed-bearing, cemented, medial conforming tibial insert with posterior cruciate ligament retention. Using model-based radiostereometric analysis, maximum total point motion (MTPM) (i.e., largest displacement on the baseplate) was computed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively relative to the day of surgery. Baseplate and limb alignment were measured postoperatively on long-leg CT scanograms. RESULTS: At 1 year, mean MTPM of 0.35 mm was significantly less than the 0.5 mm stability limit (p = 0.0002). Mean MTPM did not increase from 6 weeks to 1 year (p = 0.3047). Notably, 89% (31/35) of tibial baseplates and 46% (16/35) of limbs were > 3° varus. Baseplate and limb alignment had no relationship to MTPM at 1 year (|r|≤ 0.173, p ≥ 0.3276). CONCLUSION: Low and non-progressive tibial baseplate migration 1 year after unrestricted KA TKA with a medial conforming design should allay any concern that unrestricted KA TKA increases risk of baseplate loosening due to varus alignment of the baseplate and limb. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic prospective cohort study.

The Trochlear Groove of a Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment Is Lateral to the Quadriceps Line of Force and Better Laterally Covers the Anterior Femoral Resection Than a Mechanical Alignment Design.

Background: A concern about kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is that it relies on femoral components designed for mechanical alignment (MAd-FC) that could affect patellar tracking, in part, because of a trochlear groove orientation that is typically 6° from vertical. KA sets the femoral component coincident to the patient's pre-arthritic distal and posterior femoral joint lines and restores the Q-angle, which varies widely. Relative to KA and the native knee, aligning the femoral component with MA changes most distal joint lines and Q-angles, and rotates the posterior joint line externally laterally covering the anterior femoral resection. Whether switching from a MAd- to a KAd-FC with a wider trochlear groove orientation of 20.5° from vertical results in radiographic measures known to promote patellar tracking is unknown. The primary aim was to determine whether a KAd-FC sets the trochlear groove lateral to the quadriceps line of force (QLF), better laterally covers the anterior femoral resection, and reduces lateral patella tilt relative to a MAd-FC. The secondary objective was to determine at six weeks whether the KAd-FC resulted in a higher complication rate, less knee extension and flexion, and lower clinical outcomes. Methods: Between April 2019 and July 2022, two surgeons performed sequential bilateral unrestricted caliper-verified KA TKA with manual instruments on thirty-six patients with a KAd- and MAd-FC in opposite knees. An observer measured the angle between a line best-fit to the deepest valley of the trochlea and a line representing the QLF that indicated the patient's Q-angle. When the trochlear groove was lateral or medial relative to the QLF, the angle is denoted + or −, and the femoral component included or excluded the patient's Q-angle, respectively. Software measured the lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, and the patella tilt angle (PTA) on a skyline radiograph. Complications, knee extension and flexion measurements, Oxford Knee Score, KOOS Jr, and Forgotten Joint Score were recorded pre- and post-operatively (at 6 weeks). A paired Student's T-test determined the difference between the KA TKAs with a KAd-FC and MAd-FC with a significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The final analysis included thirty-five patients. The 20.5° trochlear groove of the KAd-FC was lateral to the QLF in 100% (15 ± 3°) of TKAs, which was greater than the 69% (1 ± 3°) lateral to the QLF with the 6° trochlear groove of the MAd-FC (p < 0.001). The KAd-FC's 2 ± 1.9 mm lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection was less than the 4.4 ± 1.5 mm for the MAd-FC (p < 0.001). The PTA, complication rate, knee extension and flexion, and clinical outcome measures did not differ between component designs. Conclusions: The KA TKA with a KAd-FC resulted in a trochlear groove lateral to the QLF that included the Q-angle in all patients, and negligible lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection. These newly described radiographic parameters could be helpful when investigating femoral components designed for KA with the intent of promoting patellofemoral kinematics.

Measurement of Tibial Orientation Helps Select the Optimal Insert Thickness to Personalize PCL Tension in a Medial Ball-in-Socket TKA.

As the conformity of a medial ball-in-socket total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides intrinsic anterior-posterior (A-P) stability, surgeons cannot rely on the manual examination of sagittal laxity to identify the optimal insert thickness. Instead, the present study determined whether measuring tibial axial orientation in extension and 90° flexion with an insert goniometer could identify the optimal thickness that, when implanted, provides high postoperative function. In twenty-two patients that underwent unrestricted caliper-verified kinematic alignment (KA) with a PCL retaining implant, two surgeons measured tibial orientation in extension and 90° flexion with 10, 11, 12, and 13 mm thick insert goniometers. Each TKA had one insert thickness that restored either the maximum external tibial orientation in extension, the maximum internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion, or both relative to 1 mm thinner and thicker inserts. In addition, the 6-month median [interquartile range] Forgotten Joint Score of 73 (54-87) and Oxford Knee Score of 42 (38-45) indicated high satisfaction and function. In conclusion, surgeons using a medial ball-in-socket TKA design can measure external tibial orientation in extension and internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion with an insert goniometer. Furthermore, implanting an insert with the thickness that provided the maximum orientation values resulted in high postoperative function, thereby personalizing PCL tension.

Six Commonly Used Postoperative Radiographic Alignment Parameters Do Not Predict Clinical Outcome Scores after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA.

BACKGROUND: Unrestricted caliper-verified kinematically aligned (KA) TKA restores patient's prearthritic coronal and sagittal alignments, which have a wide range containing outliers that concern the surgeon practicing mechanical alignment (MA). Therefore, knowing which radiographic parameters are associated with dissatisfaction could help a surgeon decide whether to rely on them as criteria for revising an unhappy patient with a primary KA TKA using MA principles. Hence, we determined whether the femoral mechanical angle (FMA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA), tibial slope angle (TSA), and the indicators of patellofemoral tracking, including patella tilt angle (PTA) and the lateral undercoverage of the trochlear resection (LUCTR), are associated with clinical outcome scores. METHODS: Forty-three patients with a CT scan and skyline radiograph after a KA TKA with PCL retention and medial stabilized design were analyzed. Linear regression determined the strength of the association between the FMA, HKA angle, PTS, PTA, and LUCTR and the forgotten joint score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and KOOS Jr score obtained at a mean of 23 months. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the FMA (range 2° varus to -10° valgus), HKAA (range 10° varus to -9° valgus), TMA (range 10° varus to -0° valgus), TSA (range 14° posterior to -4° anterior), PTA (range, -10° medial to 14° lateral), and the LUCTR resection (range 2 to 9 mm) and the FJS (median 83), the OKS (median 44), and the KOOS Jr (median 85) (r = 0.000 to 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should be cautious about using postoperative FMA, HKAA, TMA, TSA, PTA, and LUCTR values within the present study's reported ranges to explain success and dissatisfaction after KA TKA.