Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Laryngoscope ; 116(5): 705-10, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16652075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Planned neck dissection after chemoradiation (CR) is often advocated in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) with advanced nodal disease who demonstrate a clinical complete response to CR because identification of residual occult nodal disease is difficult. We sought to investigate the utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in identifying patients with occult nodal disease after CR. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized retrospective cohort analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients treated with primary CR for advanced HNSCC with N2 or N3 disease from December 2003 to June 2005 were reviewed. Patients with a clinical complete response were eligible for inclusion if PET-CT performed at 8 to 10 weeks after CR showed no evidence of distant disease and they were treated with a planned neck dissection. RESULTS: Seventeen patients met study criteria. PET-CT was positive for residual nodal disease in 11 (64.7%) patients, with a standardized uptake value (SUV) range of 1.7 to 3.8. Pathologic examination revealed residual viable carcinoma in five (29.4%) patients, with tumor size ranging from 2.0 to 9.5 mm. Carcinoma was present in 2 of 11 (18.2%) patients with positive PET-CT scans and 3 of 6 (50%) patients with negative PET-CT scans. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT in predicting occult nodal disease was 40% and 25%, respectively. There was no correlation between PET-CT findings and histologic findings (P = .26) or between SUV and size of viable tumor (P = .67). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of HNSCC patients with advanced neck disease harbor residual occult metastases after CR. PET-CT is not sufficiently specific or sensitive to reliably predict the need for posttreatment neck dissection.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Positron-Emission Tomography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Probability , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Laryngoscope ; 115(8): 1371-5, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16094107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Comorbidity is significantly associated with diminished survival and quality of life (QOL) after treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We sought to determine whether comorbidity influenced pretreatment QOL scores and treatment selection in patients with HNSCC. METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with HNSCC who participated in pretreatment QOL analysis over a 15-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a history of prior treatment for head and neck cancer, unresectable, or distant metastatic disease were excluded. The University of Washington (UW) QOL questionnaire, Performance Status Scale (PSS), and Karnofsky score were used to measure pretreatment QOL. Comorbidity was graded using the Modified Medical Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Of 75 patients who met study criteria, 33 underwent primary surgical therapy, and 42 underwent nonoperative (radiation or chemoradiation) therapy. Treatment groups did not differ with respect to patient demographics, UW QOL scores, PSS scores, Karnofsky score, or comorbidity. Treatment groups differed significantly by disease stage and primary site. Patients with advanced stage disease (III/IV) or oropharyngeal primary tumors were more likely to undergo nonoperative treatment, compared with patients with early stage disease (I/II) or oral cavity primary tumors (P < .005). No significant association was found between comorbidity and pretreatment QOL scores. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity was not significantly associated with treatment selection or pretreatment QOL scores in patients with HNSCC. Location of the primary tumor and disease stage were significantly associated with treatment selection. Further studies are required to determine the effect of comorbidity on patient and tumor responses to treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Neck Dissection/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Probability , Prognosis , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Sickness Impact Profile , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...