Beta-cell response to metformin-glibenclamide combination tablets (Glucovance) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

This exploratory double-blind, randomised, 20-week study evaluated the mechanism of action of metformin-glibenclamide combination tablets (Glucovance) vs. metformin and glibenclamide in 50 type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled by diet and exercise. A glycaemic target of HbA1C 7.0% was used. Final HbA(1C), fasting glucose and post-oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose were similar between groups, although average doses of metformin and glibenclamide from combination tablets (708 and 3.5 mg) were lower than monotherapy doses (1500 and 6.6 mg). Second-phase insulin during a hyperglycaemic clamp increased by 93% with combination tablets, 36% with metformin and 46% with glibenclamide. The insulin response post-OGTT was more rapid with the combination tablets vs. glibenclamide. First-phase insulin responses improved modestly in all groups, possibly due to reduced glucotoxicity. Changes in insulin sensitivity were minor. Larger beta-cell responses between combination tablets and glibenclamide may reflect more rapid glibenclamide absorption.

Differential effects of metformin on bile salt absorption from the jejunum and ileum.

AIMS: The antidiabetic drug metformin is often associated with a small reduction in total circulating cholesterol, but the mechanism responsible is unknown. As bile salts contribute significantly to cholesterol homeostasis, this study has investigated the effect of metformin on the absorption of bile salts by the jejunum and ileum, and their transfer into bile. METHODS: Sodium-[1-14C]-glycocholate was administered into the jejunum or ileum of anaesthetized rats with and without metformin (250 mg/kg). Appearance of 14C-glycocholate in plasma and bile was followed for 150 min. RESULTS: Absorption of 14C-glycocholate from the ileum, which is a high-capacity active process, was 10-fold greater than absorption from the jejunum, which is mainly a passive process. Metformin increased threefold the absorption of 14C-glycocholate from the jejunum. Metformin similarly increased the appearance of jejunal 14C-glycocholate in plasma and bile. In contrast to the jejunum, absorption of 14C-glycocholate from the ileum was suppressed by more than half with metformin. This was associated with corresponding reductions of 14C-glycocholate in plasma and bile. DISCUSSION: Thus, metformin induced a large suppression of active bile salt absorption from the ileum compared with a small increase in passive absorption from the jejunum. This suggests that the ileal effect of metformin to reduce overall bile salt absorption could contribute to the modest cholesterol-lowering effect of this drug.

Effects of metformin on bile salt transport by monolayers of human intestinal Caco-2 cells.

The antidiabetic biguanide metformin has been shown to increase faecal excretion of bile salts in type 2 diabetes. Cultured human intestinal Caco-2 cell monolayers provide a model of human enterocytes. These monolayers are used here to determine the effect of metformin on the secondary-active, sodium-linked transfer of 14C-glycocholate from the apical (brush border) to the basolateral (serosal) surface. During 24-h incubations, 10-2 mol/l metformin significantly reduced 14C-glycocholate transfer. This could not be attributed to alterations of monolayer integrity or Na+-K+ ATPase pump activity. For example, the secondary-active transport of glucose and proline was not interrupted, and the inhibitory effect of metformin on bile salt transport was additive to the inhibitory effect of ouabain. The results suggest that metformin can act directly on intestinal enterocytes to reduce the active transfer of bile salts by a mechanism that is independent of Na+-K+ ATPase activity.

A risk-benefit assessment of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Metformin has been used for over 40 years as an effective glucose-lowering agent in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Typically it reduces basal and postprandial hyperglycaemia by about 25% in more than 90% of patients when either given alone or coadministered with other therapies including insulin during a programme of managed care. Metformin counters insulin resistance and offers benefits against many features of the insulin resistance syndrome (Syndrome X) by preventing bodyweight gain, reducing hyperinsulinaemia and improving the lipid profile. In contrast to sulphonylureas, metformin does not increase insulin secretion or cause serious hypoglycaemia. Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with metformin from diagnosis also offers greater protection against the chronic vascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most serious complication associated with metformin is lactic acidosis which has an incidence of about 0.03 cases per 1000 patients years of treatment and a mortality risk of about 0.015 per 1000 patient-years. Most cases occur in patients who are wrongly prescribed the drug, particularly patients with impaired renal function (e.g. serum creatinine level > 130 micromol/L or > 1.5 g/L). Other major contraindications include congestive heart failure, hypoxic states and advanced liver disease. Serious adverse events with metformin are predictable rather than spontaneous and are potentially preventable if the prescribing guidelines are respected. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, notably diarrhoea, occur in less than 20% of patients and remit when the dosage is reduced. The life-threatening risks associated with metformin are rare and could mostly be avoided by strict adherence to the prescribing guidelines. Given the 4 decades of clinical experience with metformin, its antihyperglycaemic efficacy and benefits against Syndrome X, metformin offers a very favourable risk-benefit assessment when compared with the chronic morbidity and premature mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Effect of metformin on bile salt circulation and intestinal motility in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Gastrointestinal symptoms can be a limiting factor in optimizing metformin therapy, particularly at the onset of treatment. The underlying cause remains unclear. We have investigated whether metformin changes oral-caecal transit and if it causes bile salt malabsorption using the lactulose breath test and orally administered 14C-glycocholate followed by breath 14CO2 measurement over 6 h and stool collection for 72 h, respectively. Twenty-four diet and/or sulphonylurea treated patients underwent 7 days of baseline investigations before entering a randomized double-blind crossover study of 21 days duration with either metformin (850 mg bd) or placebo. No difference was observed in the oral-caecal transit time but a change in fasting plasma glucose was observed of 2.6 mmol l-1 (95% CI 1.3, 3.8). Significant increases in percentage 14CO2 breath elimination were observed during treatment with metformin (9.7 +/- 6.3) compared with placebo (3.1 +/- 1.9) p = 0.020. In addition, percentage faecal 14C bile salt excretion was increased with metformin (17.2 +/- 9.9 vs 10.1 +/- 6.9) p = 0.037. A significant association (p = 0.002) emerged for stool bile salt content and liquidity of the stool. We conclude that metformin may cause gastrointestinal disturbances by reducing ileal bile salt reabsorption leading to elevated colonic bile salt concentrations.