Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Elderly Population: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Considerations.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) refers to a clinical condition in which the signs of heart failure, such as pulmonary congestion, peripheral edema, and increased natriuretic peptide levels, are present despite normal ejection fractions and the absence of other causes (eg, pericardial disease). The ejection fraction cutoff for the definition of HFpEF has varied in the past, but recent society guidelines have settled on a consensus of 50%. HFpEF is particularly common in the elderly population. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the available literature regarding HFpEF in elderly patients in terms of evidence for the age dependence, specific clinical features, and underlying mechanisms. In the clinical arena, we review the epidemiology, discuss distinct clinical phenotypes typically seen in elderly patients, the importance of frailty, the role of biomarkers, and the role of medical therapies (including sodium-glucose cotransport protein 2 inhibitors, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors, diuretics, and ß-adrenergic receptor blockers). We then go on to discuss the basic mechanisms implicated in HFpEF, including cellular senescence, fibrosis, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, enhanced production of reactive oxygen species, abnormal cellular calcium handling, changes in microRNA signalling, insulin resistance, and sex hormone changes. Finally, we review knowledge gaps and promising areas of future investigation. Improved understanding of the specific clinical manifestations of HFpEF in elderly individuals and of the fundamental mechanisms that contribute to the age-related risk of HFpEF promises to lead to novel diagnostic and treatment approaches that will improve outcomes for this common cardiac disorder in a vulnerable population.

The Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Hospitalized Patients as Compared With Outpatients With HFrEF: An Analysis of GALACTIC-HF.

BACKGROUND: In the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial, omecamtiv mecarbil, compared with placebo, reduced the risk of worsening heart failure (HF) events, or cardiovascular death in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. The primary aim of this prespecified analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omecamtiv mecarbil by randomization setting, that is, whether participants were enrolled as outpatients or inpatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized either during a HF hospitalization or as an outpatient, within one year of a worsening HF event (hospitalization or emergency department visit). The primary outcome was a composite of worsening HF event (HF hospitalization or an urgent emergency department or clinic visit) or cardiovascular death. Of the 8232 patients analyzed, 2084 (25%) were hospitalized at randomization. Hospitalized patients had higher N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations, lower systolic blood pressure, reported more symptoms, and were less frequently treated with a renin-angiotensin system blocker or a beta-blocker than outpatients. The rate (per 100 person-years) of the primary outcome was higher in hospitalized patients (placebo group = 38.3/100 person-years) than in outpatients (23.1/100 person-years); adjusted hazard ratio 1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.12-1.31). The effect of omecamtiv mecarbil versus placebo on the primary outcome was similar in hospitalized patients (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.01) and outpatients (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.02) (interaction P = .51). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction had a higher rate of the primary outcome than outpatients. Omecamtiv mecarbil decreased the risk of the primary outcome both when initiated in hospitalized patients and in outpatients.

The Need for Fiber Addition in Symptomatic Heart Failure (FEAST-HF): A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Background: Preclinical and observational studies suggest that the gut microbiome plays a role in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF); the gut microbiome may be modified by fermentable dietary fibre (FDF). The Need for Fiber Addition in Symptomatic Heart Failure (FEAST-HF) trial evaluated feasibility of recruitment and supplementation with FDF in HF and whether FDF (acacia), compared to control, reduced the level of N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (ST2), and produced changes in the gut microbiome. Methods: Participants were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to either of the intervention arms (5 g/d or 10 g/d acacia) or to the control arm (10 g/d microcrystalline cellulose (MCC; nonfermentable active control). Adherence and tolerance were assessed, and clinical events were monitored for safety. All outcomes (NT-proBNP, ST2, New York Heart Association class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, 6-minute walk test score, gut microbiome) were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: Between September 13, 2018 and December 16, 2021, 51 patients were randomly allocated to either MCC (n = 18), acacia 5 g daily (n = 13), or acacia 10 g daily (n = 18). No differences occurred between either dose of acacia and MCC in NT-proBNP level, ST2, New York Heart Association class, or questionnaire scores over 12 weeks. Dietary treatment arms had a negligible impact on microbial communities. No safety, tolerability, or adherence issues were observed. Conclusions: Dietary supplementation with acacia gum was both safe and well tolerated in ambulatory patients with HF; however, it did not change NT-proBNP level, ST2, or the composition of the gut microbiome.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03409926.

Contexte: Des études précliniques et observationnelles donnent à penser que le microbiome intestinal joue un rôle dans la pathogenèse de l'insuffisance cardiaque (IC). Or, ce microbiome pourrait être modifié par la consommation de fibres alimentaires fermentescibles (FAF). L'essai pilote contrôlé avec répartition aléatoire FEAST-HF (pour The Need forFiberAddition inSymptomaticHeartFailure) visait à évaluer la possibilité d'administrer un supplément de FAF (l'acacia) et à déterminer si celui-ci entraîne une réduction du taux du propeptide natriurétique de type B N-terminal (NT-proBNP) et du récepteur ST2 (growth stimulation expressed gene 2) ou une modification du microbiome intestinal comparativement au placebo. Méthodologie: Les participants ont été répartis de façon aléatoire selon un rapport 1:1:1 dans l'un des groupes d'intervention (recevant 5 g/jour ou 10 g/jour d'acacia) ou dans le groupe témoin (recevant 10 g/jour de cellulose microcristalline [CMC], une fibre de référence non fermentescible). La tolérance et l'observance du traitement ont été évaluées, et les événements cliniques ont été surveillés pour évaluer l'innocuité. Tous les indicateurs (NT-proBNP, ST2, classe d'IC selon l'échelle de la New York Heart Association, score au questionnaire de cardiomyopathie de Kansas City, score à un test de marche de 6 minutes et microbiome intestinal) ont été évalués au début de l'étude, à la semaine 6 et à la semaine 12. Résultats: Entre le 13 septembre 2018 et le 16 décembre 2021, 51 patients ont pris, après répartition aléatoire, de la CMC (n = 18), 5 g d'acacia par jour (n = 13) ou 10 g d'acacia par jour (n = 18). Aucune différence n'a été observée quant au taux de NT-proBNP ou de ST2, à la classe d'IC selon la New York Heart Association ou aux scores au questionnaire entre les groupes prenant l'une ou l'autre des doses d'acacia et le groupe prenant la CMC au cours d'une période de 12 semaines. L'effet sur la flore microbienne était négligeable dans les groupes de traitement alimentaire. Par ailleurs, aucun problème lié à l'innocuité, à la tolérabilité ou à l'observance du traitement n'a été observé. Conclusions: Les suppléments alimentaires d'acacia (gomme arabique) sont sûrs et bien tolérés; toutefois, ces suppléments n'ont pas entraîné de changement dans les taux de NT-proBNP ou de ST2, ni dans la composition du microbiome intestinal.ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03409926.

Integration of longitudinal and circumferential strain predicts volumetric change across the cardiac cycle and differentiates patients along the heart failure continuum.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) circumferential and longitudinal strain provide important insight into LV mechanics and function, each contributing to volumetric changes throughout the cardiac cycle. We sought to explore this strain-volume relationship in more detail, by mathematically integrating circumferential and longitudinal strain and strain rate to predict LV volume and volumetric rates of change. METHODS: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging from 229 participants from the Alberta HEART Study (46 healthy controls, 77 individuals at risk for developing heart failure [HF], 70 patients with diagnosed HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF], and 36 patients with diagnosed HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]) were evaluated. LV volume was assessed by the method of disks and strain/strain rate were assessed by CMR feature tracking. RESULTS: Integrating endocardial circumferential and longitudinal strain provided a close approximation of LV ejection fraction (EFStrain), when compared to gold-standard volumetric assessment (EFVolume: r = 0.94, P < 0.0001). Likewise, integrating circumferential and longitudinal strain rate provided a close approximation of peak ejection and peak filling rates (PERStrain and PFRStrain, respectively) compared to their gold-standard volume-time equivalents (PERVolume, r = 0.73, P < 0.0001 and PFRVolume, r = 0.78, P < 0.0001, respectively). Moreover, each integrated strain measure differentiated patients across the HF continuum (all P < 0.01), with the HFrEF group having worse EFStrain, PERStrain, and PFRStrain compared to all other groups, and HFpEF having less favorable EFStrain and PFRStrain compared to both at-risk and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data herein establish the theoretical framework for integrating discrete strain components into volumetric measurements across the cardiac cycle, and highlight the potential benefit of this approach for differentiating patients along the heart failure continuum.

Esophageal motility in systemic sclerosis before and after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with esophageal dysmotility. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) results in improvement of skin tightness and lung function. Whether esophageal motility improves after HCT is unknown. METHODS: Esophageal motility was studied using high-resolution esophageal manometry in 21 SSc patients before and at multiple time points after autologous HCT. Median posttransplant follow-up was 2 years (range, 6 months to 5 years). RESULTS: Prior to HCT, all 21 patients had abnormal motility-10 (48%) had unmeasurable and 11 (52%) had measurable peristalsis. Manometric diagnosis in the former 10 patients was "absent contractility" and in the latter 11 patients "ineffective esophageal motility (IEM)." After HCT, among the 10 patients with absent contractility, 9 continued to have absent contractility and one demonstrated weak measurable peristalsis. Of the 11 patients with IEM, 5 experienced SSc relapse, and 2 out of these 5 patients developed absent contractility. Among the 6 non-relapsed patients, 4 continued to have IEM, and 2 developed normal motility. CONCLUSIONS: HCT appears to have no beneficial effect on motility in patients with unmeasurable peristalsis. In patients with measurable peristalsis, HCT appears to stabilize and in some normalize motility, unless relapse occurs. Key Points • In patients with systemic sclerosis, esophageal dysmotility is a significant contributor to morbidity and so far, there has been no data describing the effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation on esophageal motility. • Our work demonstrated that in patients with systemic sclerosis and unmeasurable esophageal peristalsis prehematopoietic cell transplantation, there was no measurable beneficial effect of transplantation on esophageal motility. • In patients with systemic sclerosis and measurable peristalsis prehematopoietic cell transplantation, esophageal motility stabilized, except in relapsed patients.

Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure Trajectory as a Predictor of Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension is common among patients with heart failure (HF). Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) is frequently used to assess its presence and severity. Although RVSP has been associated with adverse outcomes, the importance of serial measurements has not been studied. We evaluated associations between serial RVSP measurements and cardiovascular events in patients with HF. Methods: Patients with HF and 2 echocardiograms performed ≥ 6 months apart were included. RVSP was categorized, using the second echocardiogram, as follows: normal (< 40 mm Hg); severely elevated (≥ 60 mm Hg); moderately elevated (50-59 mm Hg); or mildly elevated (40-49 mm Hg). Patients also were classified according to change in RVSP categories between echocardiograms. The primary outcome was time to HF hospitalization (HFH) or all-cause mortality (ACM) after the second echocardiogram. Results: In total, 4319 patients were included (median age: 78 years; 52.1% female). During a median follow-up period of 19.4 months, HFH/ACM occurred in 2714 patients (62.8%). In multivariable analysis, baseline RSVP that was mildly elevated (1069 patients, hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.54), moderately elevated (797 patients, HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30-1.82), or severely elevated (837 patients, HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.60-2.31) was independently associated with HFH/ACM. Additionally, improving RVSP was associated with increased HFH/ACM in both categorical (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33) and continuous analyses. Conclusions: RVSP measurements identify patients at increased risk who may require more-aggressive monitoring and medical therapy. Our study raises the hypothesis that, in addition to the absolute value of RVSP, improving RVSP category may identify higher-risk patients, but further study is needed to elucidate the underlying reasons.

Contexte: L'hypertension pulmonaire est fréquente chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque. La pression systolique ventriculaire droite (PSVD) est souvent utilisée pour évaluer la présence et la gravité de l'hypertension pulmonaire. Bien que la PSVD ait été associée à des complications, l'importance de mesures répétitives n'a pas été étudiée. Nous avons évalué les liens entre des mesures répétitives de la PSVD et des événements cardiovasculaires chez des patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque. Méthodologie: Ont été inclus des patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque pour lesquels on disposait de deux échocardiogrammes réalisés dans un intervalle ≥ 6 mois. La PSVD a été catégorisée comme suit, au moyen du deuxième échocardiogramme : normale (< 40 mmHg); gravement élevée (≥ 60 mmHg); modérément élevée (50 à 59 mmHg) ou légèrement élevée (40 à 49 mmHg). Les patients ont également été classés dans des catégories en fonction de la variation de la PSVD d'un échocardiogramme à l'autre. Le paramètre d'évaluation principal était le temps écoulé avant une hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque ou un décès, toutes causes confondues, après le second échocardiogramme. Résultats: Au total, 4 319 patients ont été inclus (âge médian de 78 ans; 52,1 % de sexe féminin). Pendant une période de suivi médian de 19,4 mois, une hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque ou un décès, toutes causes confondues, se sont produits chez 2 714 patients (62,8 %). Une analyse multivariée a déterminé qu'une PSVD initiale légèrement élevée (1 069 patients, rapport de risques instantanés [RRI] de 1,31, intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % de 1,12 à 1,54), modérément élevée (797 patients, RRI de 1,54, IC à 95 % de 1,30 à 1,82) ou gravement élevée (837 patients, RRI de 1,92, IC à 95 % de 1,60 à 2,31) était indépendamment associée à une hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque ou à un décès, toutes causes confondues. En outre, l'amélioration de la PSVD était associée à une hausse des hospitalisations pour insuffisance cardiaque ou des décès, toutes causes confondues, dans les analyses des catégories (RRI de 1,16, IC à 95 % de 1,01 à 1,33) et continues. Conclusions: Les mesures de la PSVD ont permis de repérer les patients présentant un risque accru qui pourraient nécessiter une surveillance et un traitement médical plus intenses. Notre étude incite à poser l'hypothèse voulant qu'en plus de la valeur absolue de la PSVD, l'amélioration des catégories de PSVD puisse permettre de repérer les patients présentant un risque accru, mais des études plus approfondies sont nécessaires pour élucider les raisons sous-jacentes.

Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and mid-wall striae have similar arrhythmic outcomes as ischemic cardiomyopathy.

PURPOSE: While implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy provides clear benefit in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), this is less clear in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Mid-wall striae (MWS) fibrosis is an established cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) risk marker observed in patients with NICM. We evaluated whether patients with NICM and MWS have similar risk of arrhythmia-related cardiovascular events as patients with ICM. METHODS: We studied a cohort of patients undergoing CMR. The presence of MWS was adjudicated by experienced physicians. The primary outcome was a composite of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant, hospitalization for ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to compare outcomes for patients NICM with MWS and ICM. RESULTS: A total of 1,732 patients were studied, 972 NICM (706 without MWS, 266 with MWS) and 760 ICM. NICM patients with MWS were more likely to experience the primary outcome versus those without MWS (unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (subHR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-3.41) with no difference versus ICM patients (unadjusted subHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.93-1.86). Similar results were seen in a propensity-matched population (adjusted subHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-1.98, p = 0.711). CONCLUSION: Patients with NICM and MWS demonstrate significantly higher arrhythmic risk compared to NICM without MWS. After adjustment, the arrhythmia risk of patients with NICM and MWS was similar to patients with ICM. Accordingly, physicians could consider the presence of MWS when making clinical decisions regarding arrhythmia risk management in patients with NICM.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society-Canadian Heart Failure Society Focused Clinical Practice Update of Patients With Differing Heart Failure Phenotypes.

A number of societies produce heart failure (HF) management guidelines, comprising official recommendations on the basis of recent research discoveries, but their applicability to specific situations encountered in daily practice might be difficult. In this clinical practice update we aim to provide responses to fundamental questions that face health care providers, like appropriate timing for the introduction and optimization of different classes of medication according to specific patient phenotypes, when second-line therapies and valvular interventions should be considered, and management of difficult clinical scenarios such as cardiorenal syndrome and frailty. A consensus-based methodology was used. Approaches to 5 different phenotypes are presented: (1) The wet HF phenotype is the easiest to manage, decongestion being performed alongside introduction of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT); (2) The de novo HF phenotype requires the introduction of the 4 pillars of GDMT, personalizing the order on the basis of the individuals' biological and physiological characteristics; (3) The worsening HF phenotype is a marker of poor prognosis, and therefore should motivate optimization of GDMT, start second-line therapies, and/or reevaluate goals of care/advanced HF therapies; (4) The cardiorenal phenotypes require correct volume assessment, because renal function usually improves with decongestion; and (5) The frail HF phenotype require special attention, careful drug titration, and consideration of cardiac rehabilitation programs. In conclusion, specific common HF phenotypes call for a personalized approach to improve adoption of the HF guidelines into clinical practice.

Prevalence, incidence and clinical outcomes of epicardial coronary artery disease among transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy patients.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) patients are often older and may be at risk for obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (oeCAD). While ATTR-CM may cause small vessel coronary disease, the prevalence and clinical significance of oeCAD is not well described. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prevalence and incidence of oeCAD and its association with all-cause mortality and hospitalization among 133 ATTR-CM patients with ≥ 1-year follow-up was evaluated. The mean age was 78 ± 9 years, 119 (89%) were male, 116 (87%) had wild-type and 17 (13%) had hereditary subtypes. Seventy-two (54%) patients underwent oeCAD investigations, with 30 (42%) receiving a positive diagnosis. Among patients with a positive oeCAD diagnosis, 23 (77%) were diagnosed prior to ATTR-CM diagnosis, 6 (20%) at the time of ATTR-CM diagnosis, and 1 (3%) after ATTR-CM diagnosis. Baseline characteristics between patients with and without oeCAD were similar. Among patients with oeCAD, only 2 (7%) required additional investigations, intervention or hospitalization after ATTR-CM diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 27 months there were 37 (28%) deaths in the study population, including 5 patients with oeCAD (17%). Fifty-six (42%) patients in the study population required hospitalization, including 10 patients with oeCAD (33%). There was no significant difference in the rates of death or hospitalization among ATTR-CM patients with and without oeCAD, and oeCAD was not significantly associated with either outcome by univariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: While oeCAD is prevalent in ATTR-CM patients, this diagnosis is frequently known at time of ATTR-CM diagnosis and characteristics are similar to patients without oeCAD.

Personalized care of patients with heart failure: are we ready for a REWOLUTION? Insights from two international surveys on healthcare professionals' needs and patients' perceptions.

AIMS: Guidelines for the management of heart failure (HF) are evolving, and increasing emphasis is placed on patient-centred care. As part of the REWOLUTION HF (REal WOrLd EdUcaTION in HF) programme, we conducted two international surveys aimed at assessing healthcare professionals' (HCPs) educational needs and patients' perspectives on the care of HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anonymous online questionnaires co-developed by HF experts and patients assessed HCPs' educational needs (520 respondents, mostly cardiologists, in 67 countries) and patients' perceptions on HF impact and management (98 respondents in 18 countries). Among HCPs, 62.7% prioritized rapid initiation of all guideline-mandated medications over up-titration of some medications, and 87.7% always or frequently discussed treatment goals with patients. There was good agreement between HCPs and patients on key treatment goals, except for a greater emphasis on reducing hospitalizations among HCPs. The most frequently cited barriers to the provision of guideline-recommended pharmacological therapy were treatment side effects/intolerance, complex treatment regimens, low blood pressure, cost/reimbursement issues, and low estimated glomerular filtration rate. Most patients (81.6%) reported no difficulties taking medications as prescribed, although 21.4% felt they were taking too many pills. Patients wanted more information about HF and its consequences, prognosis, and treatments (70.4%, 74.5% and 76.6%, respectively). Cardiologists were the preferred source of information about HF, followed by general practitioners and HF nurses. CONCLUSIONS: These surveys provide valuable insights into HCPs' needs about personalized care for patients with HF, as well as patients' perceptions, expectations and preferences. These findings will be helpful to develop patient-centred, needs-driven quality improvement programmes.

Cost-effectiveness of immediate initiation of dapagliflozin in patients with a history of heart failure.

AIMS: To compare the cost-effectiveness of immediate and 12-month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin treatment in patients with a history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) from the UK, Canadian, German, and Spanish healthcare perspectives. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a decision-analytic Markov model with health states defined by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, type 2 diabetes mellitus status and incidence of heart failure (HF) events. Patient-level data for patients with prior HHF from the Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse-outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) trial were used to inform the model inputs on clinical events and utility values. Healthcare costs were sourced from the relevant national reference databases and the published literature. Compared to standard therapy, immediate initiation of dapagliflozin decreased HHF (187 events), urgent HF visits (32 events) and cardiovascular mortality (18 events). Standard therapy was associated with lifetime costs of £13 224 and 4.02 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Twelve-month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin was associated with total discounted lifetime costs and QALYs of £16 660 and 4.61, respectively, compared to £16 912 and 4.66, respectively, for immediate initiation. Compared to standard therapy, immediate and 12-month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £5779 and £5821, respectively. Compared to 12-month delayed initiation, immediate initiation of dapagliflozin had an ICER of £5263. Results were similar from the Canadian, German, and Spanish healthcare perspectives. CONCLUSION: Both immediate and 12-month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin are cost-effective. However, immediate initiation provides greater clinical benefits, with almost 10% additional QALYs gain, compared to 12-month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin and should be considered standard of care.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Systemic Sclerosis-A Review.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune, multi-organ, connective tissue disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional immunosuppressive therapies demonstrate limited efficacy. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is more efficacious but carries associated risks, including treatment-related mortality. Here, we review HCT as a treatment for SSc, its efficacy and toxicity in comparison to conventional therapies, and the proposed mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of and recent developments in patient selection. Finally, we highlight the knowledge gaps and future work required to further improve patient outcomes.

Clinical Phenotypes of Heart Failure across the spectrum of Ejection Fraction: A Cluster Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF), and especially HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), remains a challenging condition to define. The heterogenous nature of this population may be related to a variety of underlying etiologies interacting myocardial dysfunction. METHOD: Alberta HEART study was a prospective, observational cohort that enrolled participants along the spectrum of heart failure including: healthy controls, people at risk of HF, and patients with HF and preserved (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to explore phenotypes of patients with HF and at-risk of developing HF. Utilising 27 detailed clinical, echocardiographic and biomarker variables, latent class analysis with and without multiple imputation was undertaken to identify distinct clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: Of 621 participants, 191 (30.8%) and 169 (27.2%) were adjudicated by cardiologists to have HFpEF and HFrEF respectively. In the overall cohort, latent class analysis identified four distinct phenotypes. Phenotype A (n=152, 24.5%) was a healthy and low risk group. Phenotype B (n=129, 20.8%) demonstrated increased left ventricular mass and end-diastolic volumes, with elevated natriuretic peptides and clinical features of congestion. Phenotype C (n=128, 20.6%) was primarily characterised by obesity (80%) and normal indexed cardiac chamber sizes, low natriuretic peptide levels and minimal features of congestion.  Phenotype D (n=212, 34.1%) consisted of elderly patients with clinical features of congestions. Phenotypes B and D demonstrated the highest risk of mortality and hospitalization over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. CONCLUSION: Phenotypes with congestive features demonstrated increased risk profiles. Heart failure is a heterogenous classification which requires further work to appropriately categorise patients based on the underlying etiology or mechanism of impairment.

Effects of omecamtiv mecarbil in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to blood pressure: the GALACTIC-HF trial.

AIM: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have high mortality, hospitalizations, and poorly tolerate evidence-based medical treatment. Omecamtiv mecarbil may be particularly helpful in such patients. This study examined its efficacy and tolerability in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with baseline SBP ≥85 mmHg with a primary outcome of time to cardiovascular death or first heart failure event. In this analysis, patients were divided according to their baseline SBP (≤100 vs. >100 mmHg). Among the 8232 analysed patients, 1473 (17.9%) had baseline SBP ≤100 mmHg and 6759 (82.1%) had SBP >100 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 715 (48.5%) and 2415 (35.7%) patients with SBP ≤100 and >100 mmHg, respectively. Patients with lower SBP were at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Omecamtiv mecarbil, compared with placebo, appeared to be more effective in reducing the primary composite endpoint in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.94] compared with those with SBP >100 mmHg (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.03; P-value for interaction = 0.051). In both groups, omecamtiv mecarbil did not change SBP values over time and did not increase the risk of adverse events, when compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: In GALACTIC-HF, risk reduction of heart failure outcomes with omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo was large and significant in patients with low SBP. Omecamtiv mecarbil did not affect SBP and was well tolerated independent of SBP values.