Parent and emergency physician comfort with a system of on-line emergency-focused medical summaries for infants with significant cardiac disease.

Surveys were developed and administered to assess parental comfort with emergency care for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) with cardiac disease and the impact of a web-based database of emergency-focused clinical summaries (emergency information forms-EIF) called Midwest Emergency Medical Services for Children Information System (MEMSCIS) on parental attitudes regarding emergency care of their CSHCN. We hypothesized that MEMSCIS would improve the parent and provider outlook regarding emergencies of young children with heart disease in a randomized controlled trial. Children under age 2 were enrolled in MEMSCIS by study nurses associated with pediatric cardiac centers in a metropolitan area. Parents were surveyed at enrollment and 1 year on a 5-Point Likert Scale. Validity and reliability of the survey were evaluated. Study nurses formulated the emergency-focused summaries with cardiologists. One-hundred-seventy parent subjects, 94 study and 76 control, were surveyed at baseline and 1 year. Parents felt that hospital personnel were well-prepared for emergencies of their children and this improved from baseline 4.07 ± 1.03 to 1 year 4.24 ± 1.04 in study parents who had an EIF for their child and participated in the program (p = 0.0114) but not control parents. Parents perceived an improved comfort level by pre-hospital (p = 0.0256) and hospital (p = 0.0031) emergency personnel related to the MEMSCIS program. The MEMSCIS Program with its emergency-focused web-based clinical summary improved comfort levels for study parents. We speculate that the program facilitated normalization for parents even if the EIF was not used in an emergency during the study. The MEMSCIS program helps to prepare the family and the emergency system for care of CSHCN outside of the medical home.

Decision analysis as a tool to support an analytical pattern-of-reasoning.

Decision analysis is offered as a tool to aid nurses' decision-making in complex and troublesome situations where there are mutually exclusive actions and time is available for deliberation. Decision analysis can be formal or informal. Formal decision analysis provides a structure for representing the decision situation and a mathematical procedure for prescribing the alternative action that is most consistent with what is known and what one values. Informal decision analysis uses the concepts and sometimes the structure of decision analysis, but usually does not include the mathematical calculations. In the present paper, the authors illustrate how formal and informal decision analysis might be used by nurses to: (i) enhance their own decision-making; (ii) assist patients or family caregivers with decision-making and; (iii) promote informed health care policy development. Finally, the advantages and limitations of decision analysis are discussed.