Barriers to Effective Cancer Pain Management, Comparing the Perspectives of Physicians, Nurses, and Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pain associated with cancer is one of the most significant concerns for patients, families, and health care providers. Various barriers may hinder optimal pain management. AIM: The study was conducted in specialized cancer center in Jordan and aimed to explore the barriers to effective cancer pain management from the perspectives of physicians, nurses, and patients. METHODS: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional design was used, with a total sample of 185 participants (55 Physicians, 70 Nurses, and 60 Patients) who completed a demographic datasheet and the Arabic-Barrier Questionnaire II (BQII). RESULTS: The overall BQII of patient score was 2.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.7). The harmful effects of pain medications were the highest barrier 2.7 (SD = 1.0), followed by the physiologic effect 2.4 (SD = 0.9), and the communication 2.4 (SD = 1.1) subscales. Nurses and physicians reported an overall BQII of 1.9 (SD = 1.1) and 1.8 (SD = 0.9), respectively. One-way analysis of variance showed that the perspectives of patients, physicians, and nurses differed significantly in the overall BQII F(2, 182) = 6.81, p < .01, communication F(2, 182) = 10.55, p < .01, and harmful effects F(2, 182) = 7.26, p < .01. Multiple pairwise comparisons also showed that the patients significantly perceived higher communication barriers, more concerns of analgesic harmful effects, and higher overall barriers than nurses and physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found in the perspectives of patients, physicians, and nurses toward pain management barriers in the overall barriers, communication, and harmful effect. It is recommended to develop awareness programs for patients about pain management, barriers, use of analgesia, and communication. Nurses and physicians are advised to discuss mutual concerns and pay more attention to overcoming patient concerns.

The Effect of Remote-Based Monitoring and Education Program on Cancer Pain Management in an Outpatient Pain Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most feared consequences of cancer for patients and their families. Many barriers may hinder optimal pain management. AIM: Examine the effect of remote-based monitoring and education program on cancer pain management, patient-related barriers, and level of adherence to pain medication. METHODS: A sample of 134 patients was assigned to two groups; 68 in the intervention group and 66 in the control. The intervention group received three educational sessions by telephone. Both groups completed questionnaires at baseline and one month after the initial visit. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the groups in the levels of pain right now (p = .030), pain at its least (p = .016), and in the percentage of achieved pain relief (p = .048). Moreover, the intervention group experienced lower levels of interference with their general activity (p = < .001), mood (p = .011), and normal work (p = .004) post-intervention. The Attitudinal Barriers differences were statistically significant in the total mean (p = < .001), and the subscales of physiological effects (p = < .001), fatalism (p = < .001), communication (p = < .001), harmful effects (p = < .001). Participants in the intervention group exhibited higher adherence levels (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from cancer-related pain can benefit from remote-based monitoring and education programs to improve pain management outcomes, overcome barriers, and increase adherence. Further research is needed to investigate the different available educational methods and long-term effects.