Seizure protein 6 and its homolog seizure 6-like protein are physiological substrates of BACE1 in neurons.

BACKGROUND: The protease BACE1 (beta-site APP cleaving enzyme) is a major drug target in Alzheimer's disease. However, BACE1 therapeutic inhibition may cause unwanted adverse effects due to its additional functions in the nervous system, such as in myelination and neuronal connectivity. Additionally, recent proteomic studies investigating BACE1 inhibition in cell lines and cultured murine neurons identified a wider range of neuronal membrane proteins as potential BACE1 substrates, including seizure protein 6 (SEZ6) and its homolog SEZ6L. METHODS AND RESULTS: We generated antibodies against SEZ6 and SEZ6L and validated these proteins as BACE1 substrates in vitro and in vivo. Levels of the soluble, BACE1-cleaved ectodomain of both proteins (sSEZ6, sSEZ6L) were strongly reduced upon BACE1 inhibition in primary neurons and also in vivo in brains of BACE1-deficient mice. BACE1 inhibition increased neuronal surface levels of SEZ6 and SEZ6L as shown by cell surface biotinylation, demonstrating that BACE1 controls surface expression of both proteins. Moreover, mass spectrometric analysis revealed that the BACE1 cleavage site in SEZ6 is located in close proximity to the membrane, similar to the corresponding cleavage site in SEZ6L. Finally, an improved method was developed for the proteomic analysis of murine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and was applied to CSF from BACE-deficient mice. Hereby, SEZ6 and SEZ6L were validated as BACE1 substrates in vivo by strongly reduced levels in the CSF of BACE1-deficient mice. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SEZ6 and SEZ6L are physiological BACE1 substrates in the murine brain and suggests that sSEZ6 and sSEZ6L levels in CSF are suitable markers to monitor BACE1 inhibition in mice.

Subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation fails to block the anorectic effect of hydroxycitrate.

We investigated the neural mediation of the feeding suppression through orally administered hydroxycitrate (HCA) in male rats that were fed a high-glucose diet (about 48% glucose). Ten-day ad libitum food intake and body weight regain after previous body weight loss (13% of initial body weight) due to restrictive feeding were measured in rats with sham deafferentation (SHAM; n = 6), subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA; n = 7), and SDA plus celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy (SDA/CGX; n = 9). HCA suppressed the 10-day cumulative food intake in all surgical groups and body weight regain in SDA and SDA/CGX groups. Independent of HCA, SDA and SDA/CGX rats consumed less food and gained less weight compared to SHAM rats. These results demonstrate that all vagal afferents from below the diaphragm and vagal efferents of the dorsal trunk as well as splanchnic nerves (afferents and efferents) are not necessary for the feeding-suppressive effect of HCA in this animal model. Vagal afferents, however, appear to play a role in the control of intake when a high-glucose diet is consumed after a period of restrictive feeding.

Evidence for a role of the 5-HT2C receptor in central lipopolysaccharide-, interleukin-1 beta-, and leptin-induced anorexia.

We examined the role of serotonin (5-HT) and the 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors in the anorectic effects of centrally administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), and leptin. Food intake was measured in rats after intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of LPS (20 ng), IL-1 beta (10 ng), or leptin (1 microg) at lights out, followed by intraperitoneal (IP) injections of either the 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetraline (8-OH-DPAT) (125 microg/kg) or the 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist SB 242084 (0.3 mg/kg) at the onset of anorexia. SB 242084 significantly attenuated the food intake reduction caused by all compounds (all P<.01). IP 8-OH-DPAT attenuated ICV IL-1 beta-induced anorexia (P<.01). We also tested the involvement of the median raphe 5-HT(1A) receptors in peripheral LPS- and IL-1 beta-induced anorexia. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with either LPS (100 microg/kg) or IL-1 beta (2 microg/kg) at lights out, and 8-OH-DPAT (4 nmol) was administered directly into the median raphe nucleus at the onset of anorexia. Median raphe injections of 8-OH-DPAT significantly attenuated both IL-1 beta- and LPS-induced anorexia (both P<.01). These results implicate the 5-HT(2C) receptors in the mediation of central LPS-, IL-1 beta-, and leptin-induced anorexia. Our results also suggest that the midbrain raphe nuclei play a role in mediating the anorectic response to peripheral LPS and IL-1 beta.

Evidence that the anorexia induced by lipopolysaccharide is mediated by the 5-HT2C receptor.

Rats consistently reduce their food intake following injections of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Because inhibition of serotonergic (5-HT) activity by 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT(1A) activation) attenuates LPS-induced anorexia, we conducted a series of studies to examine whether other 5-HT-receptors are involved in the mediation of peripheral LPS-induced anorexia. In all experiments, rats were injected with LPS (100 microg/kg body weight [BW] ip) at lights out (hour 0). Antagonists were administered peripherally at hour 4, shortly after the onset of anorexia, which presumably follows the enhanced cytokine production after LPS. Food intake was then recorded during the subsequent 2 h or longer. 5-HT receptor antagonists cyanopindolol and SB 224289 (5-HT(1B)), ketanserin (5-HT(2A)), RS-102221 (5-HT(2C)), and metoclopramide (5-HT(3)) failed to attenuate LPS-induced anorexia. In contrast, both ritanserin (5-HT(2A/C)-receptor antagonist) (0.5 mg/kg BW) and SB 242084 (5-HT(2C)) (0.3 mg/kg BW) attenuated LPS-induced anorexia at doses that did not alter food intake in non-LPS-treated rats (all P<.01). Our results suggest that at least part of the anorexia following peripheral LPS administration is mediated through an enhanced 5-HT-ergic activity and the 5-HT(2C) receptor.

Hypothalamic implants of dilute estradiol fail to reduce feeding in ovariectomized rats.

To investigate further the site where estradiol (E(2)) inhibits food intake, we tested the effects on feeding of subcutaneous and intrahypothalamic implants of 10% E(2) benzoate in cholesterol (CHOL) or CHOL alone. E(2) was implanted subcutaneously in Silastic tubes, and intrahypothalamically via bilateral 29-gauge cannulas into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or the medial preoptic area (MPA) of ovariectomized (OVX) Sprague-Dawley and Long-Evans rats. Three-day implant periods followed 3-day baseline periods. Rats were allowed ad libitum access to chow and tap water, and food intake and body weight were measured each day. Subcutaneous 10% E(2) implants in Sprague-Dawley rats reduced food intake 21% on Day 2 and 34% on Day 3 (P's<.01) and decreased 3-day body weight gain 11 g (P<.05). In contrast, 10% E(2) implants in the PVN of Sprague-Dawley rats did not change food intake or body weight. Implants of 10% or 20% E(2) in the MPA also failed to decrease food intake. MPA implants of 10% E(2) decreased body weight gain 8 g (P<.05), but MPA implants of 20% E(2) decreased weight gain only 4 g (P>.05). To determine whether the strain of rat affected our negative results on food intake, we implanted 10% E(2) into the PVN of Long-Evans rats. Again, PVN E(2) did not decrease food intake significantly in comparison to the pretest baseline. PVN E(2) did, however, decrease body weight gain 5 g and decreased food intake 6% compared to rats with implants of CHOL (both P<.05), but these effects appeared to be due to an increase in feeding in the CHOL group in comparison to their baseline. Finally, CHOL and E(2) implants did not impair the responsivity of the PVN because acute implants of norepinephrine (NE) into the PVN of E(2)- or CHOL-treated Long-Evans rats significantly increased food intake. Our results do not support the hypothesis that E(2)'s actions in either the PVN or the MPA are sufficient to account for its inhibitory effects on feeding.