Oral sequelae of chemotherapy: an important teaching opportunity for oncology health care providers and their patients.

The object of this work was to conduct a rapid assessment of a teaching hospital's promotion of optimal oral health among its chemotherapy patients. A pilot study was undertaken, which included focus interviews with oncology clinic staff, a review of the fellowship training curriculum, and unobtrusive observations in the clinic setting. Charts were also audited for oncology patients who were probable chemotherapy candidates. A review of the data offered no evidence that oral health care was routinely addressed in a preventive context prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. Promotion of oral health care will help reduce the risk of oral sequelae of chemotherapy for patients and the subsequent impact of the oral sequelae on patients' chemotherapeutic regimen, thereby improving patients' chances of survival and improving their quality of life. Other teaching hospitals may wish to conduct a similar rapid assessment to determine whether they too could improve patient care and professional education in this area by incorporating pre-chemotherapy oral health evaluation and treatment into routine care for cancer patients.

"Decadose" effects of cisplatin on squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. II. Clinical studies.

There is evidence that solid tumors rapidly acquire cellular resistance to cisplatin. This resistance is usually mild to moderate and could be circumvented with higher concentrations of drug exposure if ancillary methods were available to avoid systemic cytotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a tenfold increase in dose (decadose) would overcome cisplatin resistance. In a clinical trial, response effects of cisplatin at dose intensities ranging from 32.5 to 200 mg/m2 per week, which were delivered by highly selective intra-arterial infusions with a simultaneously administered intravenous neutralizing agent, were measured in 31 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT). The overall response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR] to cisplatin therapy at dose intensity intervals of 0 to 74, 75 to 149, and 150 to 200 mg/m2 per week were 45.5%, 72.7%, and 100%, respectively. The average received dose intensities for nonresponders and responders (CR and PR) were 57.8 and 120.7 mg/m2 per week, respectively (P = .031). The results indicate that resistance to standard doses of cisplatin by SCC of the UADT, both previously untreated and recurrent, can be substantially overcome with "decadose" cisplatin therapy. Progress toward improving survival of patients with head and neck cancer, and possibly other site-specific malignancies, may be achieved by incorporating decadose cisplatin therapy into a multimodality treatment plan.

The role of dose intensity in determining outcome in intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

To determine whether the dose intensity of chemotherapeutic regimens correlates with the complete remission rate in adult patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma, reports of comparative trials of therapy were reviewed. Reports were identified using MEDLINE, through references from review articles, and through review of selected abstracts. Twenty-two studies including 14 randomized and eight cohort trials were analyzed to assess projected dose intensity. Four other studies were analyzed to assess the role of received dose intensity. Dose intensities were calculated using described methods and correlated with complete remission rates. Individual trials were assessed using "levels of evidence." A metaanalysis of randomized trials and a cross-trial analysis of all comparative trials using a weighted least squares linear regression were performed. Using levels of evidence, support was obtained for the hypothesis that dose intensity correlates with the remission rate from two trials in which dose intensity was "indirectly" tested. As these studies did not "directly" test dose intensity, confounding variables, including those arising from the assumptions made in calculating dose intensity, cannot be excluded. Metaanalysis showed a relative probability of achieving complete remission of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.58) favoring the pooled arm of high dose intensity. Cross-trial analysis showed a relatively weak association between dose intensity and remission rate (r = .49, P = .0001). Two of four reports retrospectively assessing received dose intensity suggested that increased dose intensity is associated with superior remission rates. These analyses suggest that dose intensity may correlate with the remission rate in advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma. However, properly designed trials directly testing dose intensity have not been performed and are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

A randomized trial comparing 12 weeks versus 36 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II breast cancer.

A randomized trial has been performed in which women with axillary node-positive breast cancer were allocated to either a short intensive 12-week chemohormonal treatment consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, vincristine, prednisone, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and tamoxifen (CMFVP plus AT) or 36 weeks of CMFVP. The median follow-up is 37 months. Of the 222 women randomized to the 12-week treatment, 113 (50.9%) have experienced either recurrence or death as compared with 90 patients (41.9%) in the 36-week treatment group. The corresponding 3-year relapse-free survivals are 55% and 64%, respectively, P = .003. Fifty-nine (26.6%) of the patients in the 12-week group have died compared with 46 (21.4%) of the 36-week group. The corresponding 3-year survival rates are 78% and 85%, respectively, P = .04. A Cox regression analysis showed an associated increased risk ratio for recurrence or death of 1.7, P = .003, and for death of 1.8, P = .017 in the 12-week treatment group compared with the 36-week group. Thus, this 12-week regimen of adjuvant chemohormonal therapy is inadequate treatment for women with axillary node-positive breast cancer; possible explanations for this inferiority are its shorter duration and/or a negative interaction of tamoxifen on the chemotherapy.

Quality of life in stage II breast cancer: an instrument for clinical trials.

A questionnaire has been developed for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with stage II breast cancer. The selection of items for this Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) was based on the problems and experiences felt to be most important by women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. The BCQ consists of 30 questions that focus on loss of attractiveness, fatigue, physical symptoms, inconvenience, emotional distress, and feelings of hope and support from others. The BCQ, other instruments that evaluate quality-of-life (Spitzer, Karnofsky, and Rand), and patient and physician global assessments were administered serially to 418 patients taking part in a randomized trial comparing a 12-week regimen and a 36-week regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy. The validity of the BCQ is supported by its correlation with the Rand Emotional (r = .58), Rand Physical (r = .60), and Spitzer (r = .62) questionnaires. The BCQ correlated more strongly with global ratings of both physical and emotional function by the patients and their physicians than the other instruments. A comparison of the quality-of-life outcomes of patients in the two treatment groups in the period beyond 3 months after initiation of treatment, when one group had completed the treatment course and the other was still on treatment, revealed that the BCQ and Karnofsky were the only instruments able to demonstrate differences between the groups (P less than .0001). Hence, the BCQ is a valid and responsive method of assessing treatment-related morbidity in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer.

Applications of dose intensity to problems in chemotherapy of breast and colorectal cancer.

Studies were analyzed to show the correlation of response with dose intensity of single-agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) against colorectal cancer, multiagent CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU) regimens against advanced breast cancer, and adjuvant therapy in stage II breast cancer. In colorectal cancer studies, subgroups in which 5-FU was given by intravenous (IV) bolus, infusion, and orally were analyzed. One study reported delivered dose levels after reductions for toxicity. This allowed calculations of received dose intensity for the three dose levels, and comparison with projected dose intensities. The data suggest that the dose-intensity response line is steep, once a threshold dose intensity has been surpassed. An increase of only 100 mg/m2/wk of received dose intensity of 5-FU increased the response rate from 20% to 29%, which in relative terms was an increase of almost 50%. Received dose intensity may correlate with response, not only in groups of patients, but also in individual patients, and this may, in fact, be the most important application of the concept of dose intensity.

Dose intensity analysis of chemotherapy regimens in ovarian carcinoma.

The relationship between outcome and dose intensity was analyzed for first-line chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer using a particular CHAP (cyclophosphamide, hexamethylmelamine, Adriamycin [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH], cisplatin) regimen as the standard. Previously described techniques were used to calculate the average dose intensity of regimens containing one, two, three, or all four drugs of CHAP, relative to the standard. The average relative dose intensity, especially the relative dose intensity of cisplatin, correlated significantly with clinical response and with median survival time (MST) of the entire group (not just the remitters). There was a distinct advantage for multiagent regimens over single alkylating agents and especially for multiagent regimens containing cisplatin. Survival correlated with response rate (of multiagent regimens). This analysis suggests that dose intensity is a determinant of treatment outcome. Prospective randomized trials would be required to test whether, and to what extent, dose intensity determines outcome independently of total amount of drug given, performance status, or other factors. If dose intensity does determine outcome, methods of increasing it should be tested in an attempt to improve treatment results.

Analysis of dose intensity for chemotherapy in early (stage II) and advanced breast cancer.

In chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer, the dose intensities of regimens containing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) correlate with remission rate. The correlation is even better if dose intensity is calculated from doses actually given instead of from targeted doses. Also, in adjuvant chemotherapy of stage II breast cancer, the dose intensities of CMF-containing regimens correlate with relapse-free survival. The adjuvant trials analyzed included studies containing only 1 or 2 of C, M, or F or with L-phenylalanine mustard (melphalan) instead of C. Three-year relapse-free survival was clearly related to dose intensity whether the analysis was of trials containing all 4 prognostic groups [women less than 50 yr with 1-3 and greater than 3 positive nodes; and those greater than or equal to 50 yr with 1-3 and greater than 3 positive nodes (P less than .00001)] or of trials in which each of these 4 groups were analyzed separately (P less than .005). In multivariate analysis, dose intensity correlated with relapse-free survival (P less than .00001), independent of the number of positive nodes or menopausal status. Randomized trials will be required before we can determine if prospective increases of dose intensity will improve outcome of chemotherapy in breast cancer.