Neuropsychological functions in Han Chinese patients in Taiwan with bipolar II disorder comorbid and not comorbid with alcohol abuse/alcohol dependence disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Studies exploring neuropsychological functions of bipolar disorder (BP) specifically include patients comorbid with alcohol abuse (AB), alcohol dependence (AD), or both (AB/AD). Contradictory assessments of neuropsychological impairment may be caused by not excluding the confounding effects of comorbid AB/AD. Most of the literature discusses BP without subtyping, which overlooks that BP-II may be a valid diagnosis different from BP-I. Because neuropsychological functions are involved in overall BP-II outcomes, we hypothesized that the neuropsychological functions of patients with BP-II comorbid with AD (BP(+AD)) are significantly different from and more impaired than those of patients with BP-II not comorbid with AD (BP(-AD)). METHODS: Using DSM-IV criteria, the study included 69 patients with BP-II (19 with BP(+AD); 28 with BP(-AD)) and 22 healthy controls compared using a battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed memory, psychomotor speed, and certain aspects of frontal executive function. All BP-II patients were in an inter-episode period (a period of remission between states of mania, hypomania, and depression). RESULTS: BP(+AD) patients had lower scores than did BP(-AD) patients and controls in verbal memory, visual memory, attention, psychomotor speed, and executive function. Working memory was poorer for BP(+AD) than BP(-AD) patients and for both BP groups than for controls. CONCLUSIONS: BP(+AD) patients manifested wide neuropsychological dysfunctions, and BP(-AD) patients showed a reduction in working memory, which suggested that working memory might be related to a history of BP-II. Neuropsychological dysfunctions seemed more strongly associated with AB/AD than with BP-II in inter-episode periods.

Neuropsychological functions in patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder.

UNLABELLED: The literature reports persistent cognitive impairments in patients with bipolar disorder even after prolonged remission. However, a majority of studies have focused only on bipolar I disorder (BP-I), primarily because bipolar II disorder (BP-II) is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed. More attention should be paid to the differences between BP-I and BP-II, especially the aspects of neuropsychological functioning. We examined the different neuropsychological functions in BP-I and BP-II patients and compared them with those of healthy controls. METHODS: The study included 67 patients with interepisode bipolar disorder (BP-I: n = 30; BP-II: n = 37) and 22 healthy controls compared using a battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed memory, psychomotor speed, and certain aspects of frontal executive function. RESULTS: The BP-I group performed poorly on verbal memory, psychomotor speed, and executive function compared to the BP-II and control groups. Both bipolar groups performed significantly less well than the control group on measures of working memory and psychomotor speed, while the BP-II group showed an intermediate level of performance in psychomotor speed compared to the BP-I and control groups. There was no difference between the groups on visual memory. CONCLUSIONS: BP-I was characterized by reduced performance in verbal memory, working memory, psychomotor speed, and executive function, while BP-II patients showed a reduction only in working memory and psychomotor speed. Cognitive impairment existed in both subtypes of bipolar disorder, and was greater in BP-I patients. Rehabilitation interventions should take into account potential cognitive differences between these bipolar subtypes.