The Predictive Value of Intraoperative Esophageal Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry in Patients With Achalasia Undergoing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Single-center Experience.

Background/Aims: We evaluated the clinical significance and prognostic power of functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry in patients with achalasia treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), and examined the clinical parameters associated with symptomatic improvement and the presence of contractility (POC) following POEM. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with achalasia treated with FLIP panometry and POEM at a tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Follow-up examination was composed of esophageal manometry and questionnaires on symptoms. We analyzed the FLIP data by interpolating using the cubic spline method in MATLAB. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 33 men and 35 women (mean age: 52 ± 17 years), of whom 14, 39, and 15 patients were diagnosed with achalasia types I, II, and III, respectively. The FLIP panometry diagnoses were reduced esophagogastric junction opening (REO) with a retrograde contractile response (n = 43); REO with an absent contractile response (n = 5); REO with a normal contractile response (n = 11); and a retrograde contractile response (n = 9). Overall, the patients showed improvements in Eckardt scores following POEM from 6.48 ± 2.20 to 1.16 ± 1.15 (P < 0.01). Post-POEM symptomatic improvement was not significantly associated with any of the clinical parameters, including panometry diagnosis. Conversely, post-POEM POC was significantly associated with the presence of repetitive antegrade contractions and achalasia subtypes (both P < 0.01). Conclusion: While FLIP panometry was not significantly associated with the clinical course of achalasia, FLIP panometry was associated with POC following POEM and may complement manometry in the functional evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Although the rate of early detection and endoscopic treatment of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is steadily increasing, there are insufficient studies on the long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment for type 1 gastric NETs. METHODS: Subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment for gastric NETs between March 1997 and December 2015 were included. Clinical features and endoscopic treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated by reviewing medical records. RESULTS: In total, 125 subjects underwent endoscopic treatment including forceps biopsy (n = 21), argon plasma coagulation (n = 1), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, n = 62), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, n = 41). In total, 103 patients with 114 lesions, who underwent EMR or ESD, were analyzed to evaluate endoscopic and oncologic outcomes. The rates of en bloc resection in the EMR and ESD groups were 91.5% and 97.7%, respectively. Complete resection rates were significantly higher in the ESD group than in the EMR group; it was also higher in < 1-cm small-sized lesions than in 1-2-cm large-sized lesions. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. During a median follow-up period of 63 months, local recurrence rates were 6.5% and 2.4% in the EMR and ESD groups, respectively, and the disease-free survival rate did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment for type 1 gastric NETs less than 2 cm in diameter and confined to mucosal and submucosal layers could be an effective and safe treatment strategy based on the favorable long-term outcome.

Selected nasogastric lavage in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification before endoscopy is crucial for proper management of patients suspected as having upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). There is no consensus regarding the role of nasogastric lavage for risk stratification. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of nasogastric lavage to identify patients with UGIB requiring endoscopic examination. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2018, patients who visited the emergency department with a clinical suspicion of UGIB and who underwent nasogastric lavage before endoscopy were eligible. Patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding were excluded. The added predictive ability of nasogastric lavage to the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) was estimated using category-free net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement. RESULTS: Data for 487 patients with nonvariceal UGIB were analyzed. The nasogastric aspirate was bloody in 67 patients (13.8 %), coffee-ground in 227 patients (46.6 %), and clear in 193 patients (39.6 %). The gross appearance of the nasogastric aspirate was associated with the presence of UGIB. Model comparisons showed that addition of nasogastric lavage findings to the GBS improved the performance of the model to predict the presence of UGIB. Subgroup analysis showed that nasogastric lavage improved the performance of the prediction model in patients with the GBS ≤ 11, whereas no additive value was found when the GBS was greater than 11. CONCLUSIONS: Nasogastric lavage is useful for predicting the presence of UGIB in a subgroup of patients, while its clinical utility is limited in high-risk patients with a GBS of 12 or more.

Successful Treatment of Fulminant Hepatitis due to Varicella Zoster Virus using Immunoglobulin in a Kidney Transplant Patient.

The clinical benefit of adjuvant intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is controversial in immunocompromised patients with severe varicella. A twenty-one-year-old woman who had received a kidney transplant one year earlier presented with fever and generalized rash for 5 days. Initial immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG for varicella zoster virus (VZV) were negative; however, the patient was diagnosed with varicella with fulminant hepatitis because VZV-specific PCR from skin vesicles and blood was positive. The patient received intravenous acyclovir and 5-day IVIG. The decline of plasma viral load was steeper (beta coefficient -0.446) during IVIG therapy than after the therapy (beta coefficient -0.123) (P = 0.04), while VZV glycoprotein IgG titers and VZV-specific T cell responses were not detected during the 5-day IVIG therapy. The patient improved without any complications. This case provides an experimental evidence that adjuvant IVIG can significantly reduce viral load in immunocompromised patients with severe varicella.