Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 100(1): 5-13, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11265261

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A large proportion of antibiotics used in hospitals is for surgical prophylaxis. We determined the prevailing practices and factors associated with the misuse of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in hospitals in Taiwan. METHODS: In a systematic survey of the medical records of 629 patients from 14 hospitals who underwent clean or clean-contaminated surgery from September 1998 through March 1999, data on the timing and duration of, and reasons for, antibiotic use were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 578 (92%) patients received antibiotics perioperatively; in 499 (79%) cases, antibiotics were used for surgical prophylaxis. Only 302 (61%) patients received prophylaxis within 1 hour before surgery. More than 70% of patients received more than 3 days of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The most commonly used antibiotics were first-generation cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Factors independently associated with inappropriately timed prophylaxis included surgery performed at a hospital with a greater proportion of intensive care unit beds (conditional odds ratio [OR] = 1.14 per 1% increase, 95% confidence interval [CI95%] 1.06-1.23; p < 0.01), surgery duration of at least 1 hour (OR = 0.40, CI95% 0.24-0.67; p < 0.01), orthopedic surgery (OR = 0.59, CI95% 0.36-0.98; p = 0.041), and cardiothoracic surgery (OR = 2.07, CI95% 1.14-3.77; p = 0.02). Risk factors for more than 3 days of prophylaxis included surgical placement of prosthetic material (OR = 2.26, CI95% 1.10-4.64; p = 0.03), the number of antibiotics used (OR = 1.99 per antibiotic, CI95% 1.26-3.13; p < 0.01), surgery duration of at least 1 hour (OR = 3.07, CI95% 1.45-6.51; p < 0.01), neurosurgery (OR = 4.57, CI95% 2.24-9.31; p < 0.01), and the use of oral antibiotics together with intravenous drugs (OR = 20.72, CI95% 10.72-40.07; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey indicate that inappropriate use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is common in hospitals in Taiwan. Our results identify several problem areas, including incorrect timing, duration, and use of oral antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, that require targeted physician education and public health interventions.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Utilization , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Taiwan , Time Factors
2.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 4(5): 236-44, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11063555

ABSTRACT

Multi-resistant bacterial strains are increasingly prevalent in hospital environments. Bacterial resistance is an important problem, especially for practitioners in intensive care units (ICUs) because of the selective pressure on the prevalent bacteria in these environments. The MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection) study has been monitoring the performance of carbapenems and other antibiotics in different hospitals for at least 3 years. The in vitro activities of meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, piperacilin/tazobactam, gentamicin, and tobramycin were compared against 452 recent clinical aerobic isolates. The isolates consisted of 19 species of Gram-negative bacteria (n=290) including K. pneumoniae (n=49), E. coli (n=48), A. baumannii (n=47), Enterobacter spp. (n=41), and P. aeruginosa (n=33) and 9 species of Gram-positive bacteria (n=162) including Staphylococcus aureus (n=63), Enterococcus faecalis (n=22), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=22) and coagulase negative Staphylococci (n=21). All isolates were collected from ICU patients. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by Etest methodology, using standardized and controlled procedures. Meropenem and imipenem showed the lowest MIC(90) for all species tested. Gram-negative isolates showed the following overall resistance percentages to the other 7 drugs: tobramycin (43.1%), cefotaxime (38.6%), gentamicin (34.1%), ceftazidime (31.7%), ciprofloxacin (25.5%), piperacillin/tazobactam (26.9%), and cefepime (18.6%). Carbapenems were the most active drugs overall and only P. aeruginosa presented some degree of resistance (18.2%). We also evaluated the production of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) among all Enterobacteriaceae members (n=176) by Etest/ESBL strip. ESBL production was detected in 51 strains (29.0%). Among them, Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most prevalent at 59.2%, followed by Enterobacter spp. (19.5%) and E. coli (14.6%). The high level of resistance against several antimicrobials and the alarming rate of ESBL production may restrict therapeutic choice to the carbapenems in this selected group of patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Cross Infection/microbiology , Intensive Care Units , Lactams/pharmacology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Brazil , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Sentinel Surveillance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...