Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Vet Sci ; 21(3): e34, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32476310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A nationwide outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in South Korea caused massive economic losses in 2010. Since then, the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (QIA) has enhanced disinfection systems regarding livestock to prevent horizontal transmission of FMD and Avian influenza (AI). Although the amount of disinfectant used continues to increase, cases of FMD and AI have been occurring annually in Korea, except 2012 and 2013. OBJECTIVES: This study measured the concentration of the disinfectant to determine why it failed to remove the horizontal transmission despite increased disinfectant use. METHODS: Surveys were conducted from February to May 2017, collecting 348 samples from disinfection systems. The samples were analyzed using the Standards of Animal Health Products analysis methods from QIA. RESULTS: Twenty-three facilities used inappropriate or non-approved disinfectants. Nearly all sampled livestock farms and facilities-93.9%-did not properly adjust the disinfectant concentration. The percentage using low concentrations, or where no effective substance was detected, was 46.9%. Furthermore, 13 samples from the official disinfection station did not use effective disinfectant, and-among 72 samples from the disinfection station-88.89% were considered inappropriate concentration, according to the foot-and-mouth disease virus guidelines; considering the AIV guideline, 73.61% were inappropriate concentrations. Inappropriate concentration samples on automatic (90.00%) and semi-automatic (90.90%) disinfection systems showed no significant difference from manual methods (88.24%). Despite this study being conducted during the crisis level, most disinfectants were used inappropriately. CONCLUSIONS: This may partially explain why horizontal transmission of FMD and AI cannot be effectively prevented despite extensive disinfectant use.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease , Influenza in Birds , Poultry Diseases , Swine Diseases , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Cattle Diseases/virology , Chickens , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Ducks , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/transmission , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/drug effects , Influenza A virus/drug effects , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Influenza in Birds/virology , Livestock , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Poultry Diseases/transmission , Poultry Diseases/virology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Sus scrofa , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/transmission , Swine Diseases/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...