Image-guided percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

PURPOSE: Disease control and survival following percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) was studied retrospectively. METHODS: Six patients underwent 16 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 35 liver tumors from 2015 to 2022 (17 microwave ablation, 9 irreversible electroporation, 8 cryoablation, and 1 radiofrequency ablation). Technical success, local progression, intrahepatic progression, distant progression, overall survival, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Four of six (67%) patients were treatment naïve prior to ablation. The mean length of imaging follow-up from first ablation procedure was 43.0 ± 31.2 months. Thirty-three of 35 (94.3%) ablated tumors did not progress locally. Three of 6 patients (50%) had new intrahepatic progression and underwent repeat ablation or systemic treatment. No extrahepatic progression was observed. One patient died from EHE 2.7 years after initial diagnosis. No severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ablation is feasible, often in a staged fashion, and may provide favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with hepatic EHE.

Image-Guided Ablation of Recurrent or Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of image-guided ablation of recurrent or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 25 patients (14 women; age, 36-84 years) underwent 37 image-guided liver tumor ablation procedures to treat 47 ICCs (May 2004 to January 2022). At initial diagnosis, 20 patients had Stage 1 or 2 disease and 5 had Stage 3 or 4 disease. Before ablation, 19 (76.0%) of the 25 patients had progressed through prior treatments, including resection (n = 11), chemotherapy (n = 11), transarterial embolization (n = 3), or radiotherapy (n = 1); 6 (24.0%) of the 25 patients were treatment naïve. Ablation modality selection was based on patient and tumor characteristics and operator preference. Primary outcomes included local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after ablation. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The mean ablated tumor size was 2.0 cm ± 1.2 (range, 0.5-5.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 72.9-96.8), 73.0% (95% CI, 59.0-90.4), and 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6-85.1), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary LPFS rates were 89.5% (95% CI, 80.2-99.9), 81.9% (95% CI, 69.4-96.6), and 75.6% (95% CI, 60.2-94.9). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates for tumors ≤2 cm in size were all 95.8% (95% CI, 88.2-100.0). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 78.5% (95% CI, 63.5-97.2), 68.4% (95% CI, 51.3-91.1), and 43.5% (95% CI, 23.5-80.5). Larger tumor size was associated with decreased time to local progression (hazard ratio, 1.93; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous ablation provided favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with recurrent or inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.

Periprocedural factors associated with overall patient survival following percutaneous image-guided liver tumor cryoablation.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of periprocedural factors, including adverse events, on overall patient survival following image-guided liver tumor cryoablation procedures. METHODS: In this retrospective single-institution study, 143 patients (73 male, 70 female, ages 29-88) underwent 169 image-guided liver tumor cryoablation procedures between October 1998 and August 2014. Patient, tumor and procedural variables were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival post-procedure (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Secondary outcomes were the impact of 15 variables on patient survival, which were assessed with multivariate cox regression and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Mean tumor diameter was 2.5 ± 1.2 cm. 26 of 143 (18.2%) patients had primary hepatic malignancies; 117 of 143 (81.8%) had liver metastases. Survival analysis revealed survivor functions at 3, 5, 7, 10 and 12 years post-ablation of 0.54, 0.37, 0.30, 0.17 and 0.06, with mean survival time of 40.8 ± 4.9 months. Tumor size ≥4 cm (p = .018), pre-procedural platelet count <100 × 103/µL (p = .023), and prior local radiation therapy (p = .014) were associated with worse overall patient survival. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were not associated with reduced survival (p = .49). CONCLUSIONS: All variables associated with overall survival were patient-related and none were associated with the cryoablation procedure. Pre-procedural thrombocytopenia, larger tumor size and history of prior local radiation therapy were independent risk factors for reduced overall survival in patients undergoing hepatic cryoablation. Adverse events related to hepatic cryoablation were not associated with decreased survival.

High Sensitivity of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Genotyping in Cases With Evidence of Adequate Tumor Content.

Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing is a compelling diagnostic tool in solid tumors and has been shown to have high positive predictive value. However, limited assay sensitivity means that negative plasma genotyping, or the absence of detection of mutation of interest, still requires reflex tumor biopsy. METHODS: We analyzed two independent cohorts of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with known canonical driver and resistance mutations who underwent plasma cfDNA genotyping. We measured quantitative features, such as maximum allelic frequency (mAF), as clinically available measures of cfDNA tumor content, and studied their relationship with assay sensitivity. RESULTS: In patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M, detection of driver mutation at > 1% AF conferred a sensitivity of 97% (368/380) for detection of T790M across three cfDNA genotyping platforms. Similarly, in a second cohort of patients with EGFR or KRAS driver mutations, when the mAF of nontarget mutations was > 1%, sensitivity for driver mutation detection was 100% (43/43). Combining the two NSCLC patient cohorts, the presence of nontarget mutations at mAF > 1% predicts for high sensitivity (> 95%) for identifying the presence of the known driver mutation, whereas mAF of ≤ 1% confers sensitivity of only 26%-54% across platforms. Focusing on 21 false-negative cases where the driver mutation was not detected on plasma next-generation sequencing, other mutations (presumably clonal hematopoiesis) were detected at ≤ 1% AF in 14 (67%). CONCLUSION: Plasma cfDNA genotyping is highly sensitive when adequate tumor DNA content is present. The likelihood of a false-negative cfDNA genotyping result is low in a sample with evidence of > 1% tumor content. Bioinformatic approaches are needed to further optimize the assessment of cfDNA tumor content in plasma genotyping assays.

Liver Tumor Ablation Procedure Duration and Estimated Patient Radiation Dose: Comparing Positron Emission Tomography/CT and CT Guidance.

PURPOSE: To compare procedure duration and patient radiation dose in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT-guided liver tumor ablation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, case-control study, 275 patients underwent 368 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 537 tumors. Radiologists used PET/CT guidance for 117 procedures and CT guidance for 251 procedures. PET/CT-guided procedures were performed by one radiologist (C: P.B.S.). All 3 radiologists (A: J.G.S., B: a radiologist who is not an author on this article, and C: P.B.S.) performed CT-guided procedures. Potential confounders included patient demographics, clinical and tumor characteristics, and procedural variables. RESULTS: The mean duration and estimated patient radiation dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 21.5 ± 4.9 minutes longer and 0.7 ± 2.8 mSv higher than CT-guided procedures performed by all radiologists in an unadjusted comparison. Adjusting for confounding, mean duration and estimated dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 28.3 ± 3.8 minutes longer (P < .0001) and 6.2 ± 2.9 mSv higher (P = .03) than CT-guided procedures performed by the same radiologist. Comparing CT-guided procedures performed by all 3 radiologists, adjusted mean durations and estimated patient doses of procedures by the least experienced radiologist, radiologist A, and the second most experienced radiologist, radiologist B, were 24.2 ± 5.1 (P < .0001) and 18.1 ± 8.9 (P = .04) minutes longer and 13.1 ± 3.7 (P < .001) and 14.5 ± 6.4 (P = .02) mSv higher, respectively, than procedures performed by the most experienced radiologist, radiologist C. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT-guided liver ablations had a slightly longer duration with slightly higher estimated patient radiation dose than similar CT-guided liver ablations. Procedure duration and patient dose do not appear to be major impediments to the emerging field of PET/CT-guided tumor ablation.