Systolic blood pressure and early neurological deterioration in minor stroke: A post hoc analysis of ARAMIS trial.

BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was a predictor of early neurological deterioration (END) in stroke. We performed a secondary analysis of ARAMIS trial to investigate whether baseline SBP affects the effect of dual antiplatelet versus intravenous alteplase on END. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included patients in the as-treated analysis set. According to SBP at admission, patients were divided into SBP ≥140 mmHg and SBP <140 mmHg subgroups. In each subgroup, patients were further classified into dual antiplatelet and intravenous alteplase treatment groups based on study drug actually received. Primary outcome was END, defined as an increase of ≥2 in the NIHSS score from baseline within 24 h. We investigated effect of dual antiplatelet vs intravenous alteplase on END in SBP subgroups and their interaction effect with subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 723 patients from as-treated analysis set were included: 344 were assigned into dual antiplatelet group and 379 into intravenous alteplase group. For primary outcome, there was more treatment effect of dual antiplatelet in SBP ≥140 mmHg subgroup (adjusted RD, -5.2%; 95% CI, -8.2% to -2.3%; p < 0.001) and no effect in SBP <140 mmHg subgroup (adjusted RD, -0.1%; 95% CI, -8.0% to 7.7%; p = 0.97), but no significant interaction between subgroups was found (adjusted p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet may be better than alteplase with respect to preventing END within 24 h when baseline SBP ≥140 mmHg.

Benefit of endovascular treatment for primary versus secondary medium vessel occlusion: A multi-center experience.

AIMS: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with primary versus secondary medium vessel occlusion (MeVO). METHODS: From the endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the China registry, we collected consecutive patients with MeVO who received EVT. The primary endpoint was a good outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 to 2 at 90 days. RESULTS: 154 patients were enrolled in the final analysis, including 74 primary MeVO and 80 secondary MeVO. A good outcome at 90 days was achieved in 42 (56.8%) patients with primary MeVO and 33 (41.3%) patients with secondary MeVO. There was a higher probability of good outcomes in patients with the primary vs secondary MeVO (adjusted odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 4.46; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in secondary and safety outcomes between MeVO groups. In the multivariable analysis, baseline ASPECTS (p = 0.001), final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score (p = 0.01), and any ICH (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with good outcomes in primary MeVO patients, while baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (p = 0.002), groin puncture to recanalization time (p = 0.02), and early neurological improvement (p < 0.001) were factors associated with good outcome in secondary MeVO patients. CONCLUSION: In MeVO patients who received EVT, there was a higher likelihood of poor outcomes in patients with secondary versus primary MeVO.

Rescue thrombolysis for medium vessel occlusion (RESCUE-TNK): Rationale and design of a phase 2 randomized trial.

Background: The best reperfusion strategy for medium-sized vessel occlusion (MeVO) is not well established. Given the proven treatment effect of intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), we hypothesized that intra-arterial tenecteplase (TNK) could increase the recanalization rate of MeVO and thus improve clinical outcome. Aims: To explore the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial TNK in patients with MeVO. Sample size estimates: A maximum of 80 patients are required to test the superiority hypothesis, using power = 80% and α = 0.025 to conduct the one-sided test. Design: Rescue treatment for mEdium veSsel oCclUsion by intra-artErial TNK (RESCUE-TNK) is a pilot, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, and multicenter trial. Eligible patients including primary MeVO as detected by the first DSA examination or secondary MeVO after endovascular treatment (EVT) for LVO will be assigned into the experimental group and control group as a ratio of 1:1. The experimental group will be treated with intra-arterial TNK (0.2-0.3 mg/min, for 20-30 min) via a microcatheter placed proximal to the site of occlusion, and the control group will be treated with routine therapy. Both groups of patients will be given standard stroke care based on the guidelines. Outcome: The primary efficacy end point is successful recanalization of MeVO, defined as the expanded treatment in cerebral ischemia (eTICI) score 2b67-3 after the procedure, while the primary safety end point is symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase ≥4 caused by intracranial hemorrhage within 24 (-6/+24) hours after randomization. Conclusion: The results of RESCUE-TNK will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial TNK in the recanalization of patients with MeVO.