[Critical limb ischemia during perioperative period of open surgery for rupture abdominal aortic aneurysm: treatment and prognosis].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the treatment and prognosis of critical limb ischemia during perioperative period of open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Retrospective reviews were conducted for the clinical data of unstable ruptured AAA patients with open repair at our hospital from June 2002 to June 2012 to examine the characteristics and treatment regimens for associated critical limb ischemia. RESULTS: A total of 46 unstable AAAs were enrolled. There were 37 males and 9 females with an average age of 69 years. All AAAs were repaired by a bifurcated polytetrafluoroethylene graft via a transperitoneal midline incision. Critical limb ischemia was found in 8 patients during or after the procedure. Treatments included additional graft-distal iliac artery bypass (n = 2), anastomotic stoma stenting (n = 2), Fogarty catheter embolectomy plus local thrombolysis (n = 2), Fogarty catheter embolectomy (n = 1) and venous thrombolysis (n = 1). Lower limb necrosis developed in 5 patients (4 unilateral, 1 bilateral) and all of them died. CONCLUSION: Open repair of ruptured AAA may be associated with a considerate morbidity of critical limb ischemia. Early reconstruction of blood flow improves the prognosis.

[Surgical treatment of non-traumatic aneurysm in ilio-femoral arterial region].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the surgical experiences of treating 61 cases of non-traumatic aneurysms in ilio-femoral arterial region. METHODS: The clinical data of 61 consecutive patients with non-traumatic aneurysms in ilio-femoral arterial region between January 1985 and November 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: There were a total of 76 non-traumatic aneurysms in ilio-femoral arterial region, including solitary iliac aneurysms (n = 29) and femoral aneurysms (n = 32). Seventeen (27.9%) patients had multiple aneurysms, 8 (13.1%) patients ruptured aneurysms and 4 (6.6%) patients coexistent peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Fifty patients underwent electively aneurysm excision and graft (or autogenous vein) replacement. Seven patients with ruptured aneurysms received emergency treatment. And one with multiple aneurysms died intra-operatively from ruptured iliac aneurysm. One patient with common iliac aneurysm underwent endovascular repair without endoleak and 1 with internal iliac aneurysm received embolization. There was no perioperative mortality. But one with femoral aneurysm underwent amputation due to acute thrombosis. Seven patients died during the follow-up period and the survivors remained stable and had a good graft patency without new aneurysm formation. CONCLUSION: Early management of aneurysms in ilio-femoral arterial region is rather important and multiple aneurysms should be considered. Aneurysm excision and arterial reconstruction yield an excellent outcome. Close and long-term follow-up is mandatory for the detection of new aneurysm formation.

[Management and prognosis of acute arterial embolism: a multivariable analysis of 346 patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the management of acute arterial embolism (AAE) and its prognostic factors. METHODS: The clinical data of 346 AAE patients treated at our hospital between January 1998 and October 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic factors, including age, gender, extremities, location of embolism, ischemic duration, ischemic categories, and therapeutic methods, postoperative complications were evaluated by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 210 males and 136 females with a mean age of (63 ± 14) years old. Fifty-six patients occurred in the upper extremities and 290 patients in the lower extremities. The causes included cardiogenic embolism (n = 301), vasogenic embolism (n = 33) and unknown origin (n = 12). The duration of ischemia ranged from 1 h to 7 d. Only 44 patients were admitted ≤ 8 h and the remainder > 8 h. The categories of extremity ischemia were level I (n = 17), level IIA (n = 69), level IIB (n = 221) and level III (n = 39). The procedures included embolectomy (n = 280), interventional thrombolysis (n = 19) and conservative treatment (n = 47). Thirteen patients (3.76%) died of complications during the perioperative periods. And 44 (12.72%) underwent amputations and 289 (83.53%) had excellent clinical outcome with extremity salvage. During a 5-year follow-up period, 38 patients had a recurrent embolism. The Logistic regression analysis showed that ischemic duration, ischemic category, therapeutic methods and complications had significant prognostic influences (all P < 0.05). And other factors such as age, gender, extremities and the location of embolism had insignificant influences (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Embolectomy is the first-choice therapy for AAE with an excellent outcome. Ischemic duration, ischemic grading, surgical treatment and complications have significant prognostic influences. Systematic medical treatments, such as effective anticoagulation, are vital in the prevention of recurrent AAE.

[The study of different operative style for abdominal aortic aneurysm during surrounding operation].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the the similarities and differences during the surrounding operation of endovascular repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: 112 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were selected from 2004 to 2009: among them, 66 patients were treated with EVAR, 46 patients with OSR. Data of two groups were collected and analyzed during surrounding operation. RESULTS: Compared to OSR group, the mean blood lost, blood transfusion and intra-operative fluid in EVAR group were significantly less than OSR group (P < 0.05). The mean time of operation, observation period in ICU and being in hospital in EVAR group were shorter than OSR group (P < 0.05). But the cost of hospitalization in EVAR was far higher than that of OSR group (P < 0.05). In short term postoperative complications the OSR group was higher than the EVAR (P < 0.05), however, there was no statistically significant difference in death rate of the two groups during surrounding operation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: EVAR has the advantages of mild trauma, less blood loss, quicker recovery after operation, and less disturbance to internal environment. Especially, it is suitable for the patients who can not undergo open surgery repair, but its cost is still higher.

[Analysis of death-related factors of type B aortic dissection treated medically during the acute phase].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the death-related risk factors of type B aortic dissection treated medically during the acute phase (symptoms presenting within 14 d), and to determine the predictors of surgical indications for acute type B aortic dissection. METHODS: Clinical data of 42 patients with acute type B aortic dissection admitted from January 2007 to May 2009 was retrospectively reviewed. There were 33 male and 9 female with a mean age of (50 +/- 12) years old. Therapy included analgesia, controlled hypotension and beta-receptor blocker, the mortality in acute phase was 33.3% (14/42). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of the death in acute phase. RESULTS: In univariate logistic regression analysis, the malperfusion of aortic branches (P = 0.018) and maximum aortic diameter (P = 0.002) were significant predictors of death. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the malperfusion of aortic branches (P = 0.041) and maximum aortic diameter (P = 0.005) were also considered as the significant death-related factors.Risk of death augmented significantly (P = 0.000) when the maximum aortic diameter over 40 mm. CONCLUSION: Malperfusion of aortic branches and the large maximum aortic diameter (> 40 mm) are the indications of surgery or endovascular therapy for acute type B aortic dissection.