Quantification of Cephalometric Changes in Gonial Angle Morphology Following Facial Feminization Surgery.

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is a type of gender-affirming surgery aimed at bringing masculine facial features more in line with typically feminine characteristics. Specifically, mandibular contouring can create a softer jawline and help create a more round, feminine face. As the popularity of FFS continues to increase, improving surgical techniques and patient satisfaction is imperative. However, no quantitative measurement system currently exists to measure these changes. In this study, the authors describe the use of a novel segmentation technique using computerized tomography imaging to quantify the bony changes that occur during gonial angle reduction. Further, authors utilize this technique to describe changes in a cohort of 13 patients, and how these changes correlate with patient satisfaction. The authors found that gonial angle volume and surface area significantly decreased, as well as the intergonial:interzygomatic ratio, with a smaller ratio associated with more feminine features. In addition, patient satisfaction significantly increased post-operatively both specifically regarding jawline appearance (P = 0.0014) and regarding overall social and psychological function (P = 0.0021 and P = 0.0032, respectively), as captured by the FACE-Q and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) surveys. Patients with greater changes in surface area reported greater improvements in WHOQOL psychological scores (P = 0.0086), and patients with greater changes in the intergonial:interzygomatic ratio reported greater improvements in WHOQOL social scores (P = 0.0299). Overall, our novel technique captures significant changes in gonial angle shape and can be applied to a wide range of future studies to improve the quality and accessibility of FFS.

Evolution of Virtual Surgical Planning Use Among Craniofacial Surgeons.

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has benefits in craniofacial surgery with growing popularity. However, while specific use cases are highlighted in the literature, no studies exist providing an overview of VSP use among craniofacial surgeons, and little is known about the extent of exposure to VSP during plastic surgery training. This study surveyed members of The American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons (ASMS) to better characterize both the landscape of VSP use among practicing craniofacial surgeons and the extent of exposure to VSP throughout surgical training. An electronic survey was administered in the fall of 2023. Response data included surgeon demographics, VSP usage, including the use in residency/fellowship, procedures for which VSP is used, and assessment of VSP's impact on the surgeon's practice. Demographics and VSP use were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using χ2 tests and t-tests, respectively. Of the 44 respondents, 40 (90.9%) completed a craniofacial surgery fellowship, and 18 (40.9%) utilized VSP in either residency or fellowship. In respondents' current practice, VSP is utilized most commonly for orthognathic surgery (n=32, 91.4%), postablative reconstruction (n=23, 82.1%), and facial feminization (n=11, 73.3%). Shorter operative time and improved esthetic outcomes were frequently reported as benefits derived from VSP use. Finally, surgeons in practice for less than 10 years were significantly more likely to have used VSP in both residency (OR=20.3, P<0.01) and in fellowship (OR=40.6, P<0.01) than those practicing for more than 10 years. These findings suggest that craniofacial surgeons apply VSP more commonly for certain procedure types. Our results additionally suggest that incorporation of VSP into residency and fellowship training has become significantly more common over time, with a pivot towards integration in the last decade.

The role of genetics on behavioral outcomes in nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous work identified an association between genetics and neurodevelopmental delays in patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. The authors investigated the role of genetic mutations on behavioral outcomes of patients with treated sagittal synostosis. METHODS: Parents of children aged 6-18 years with surgically corrected sagittal synostosis were recruited to complete the Child Behavioral Checklist (overall behavioral problems), Conners 3rd Edition-Parent (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), Social Responsiveness Scale 2nd Edition (autism spectrum disorder [ASD]), and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2nd Edition (executive function). Genomic analysis was completed, and patients were identified if they had mutations in high probability of loss of function intolerant (pLI) genes (high pLI vs nonhigh pLI). Genetic burden was assessed relative to controls. Multivariate linear regression determined the association of mutations in high pLI genes with behavioral scores, while controlling for sociodemographic factors, age at surgery, surgery type, and IQ. RESULTS: Sixteen of 45 patients were in the high pLI group. There were no differences between the groups in terms of sociodemographic factors. A greater proportion of children in the high pLI group scored at or above borderline clinical levels for aggression (18.8% vs 0.0%, p = 0.05) and externalizing problems (31.3% vs 3.7%, p = 0.02). Among children in the nonhigh pLI group, older age at surgery was associated with worse scores on the rule-breaking, aggression, and externalizing problems domains and four out of five ASD domains. CONCLUSIONS: Children with treated nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis and mutations in high pLI genes had worse behavioral problems in externalizing behaviors and aggression, whereas older age at surgery was a significant predictor of worse behavioral outcomes in patients without mutations in high pLI genes.

Sports participation after craniosynostosis repair: the critical role of post-operative guidance in parental decision-making.

PURPOSE: Despite previous research supporting patient safety in sports after craniosynostosis surgery, parental anxiety remains high. This study sought to evaluate the role of healthcare providers in guiding patients and families through the decision-making process. METHODS: Parents of children with repaired craniosynostosis were asked to assess sports involvement and parental decision-making in children ages 6 and older. Questions were framed primarily on 5-point Likert scales. Sport categorizations were made in accordance with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Chi-squared, linear regression, and Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze associations between the questions. RESULTS: Forty-three complete parental responses were recorded. Mean ages at surgery and time of sports entry were 7.93 ± 4.73 months and 4.76 ± 2.14 years, respectively. Eighty-two percent of patients participated in a contact sport. Discussions with the primary surgeon were more impactful on parental decisions about sports participation than those with other healthcare providers (4.04 ± 1.20 vs. 2.69 ± 1.32). Furthermore, children whose parents consulted with the primary surgeon began participating in sports at a younger age (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 5.8 ± 2.7 years, p = 0.034). The mean comfort level with contact sports (2.8 ± 1.4) was lower than that with limited-contact (3.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.0001) or non-contact (4.4 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001) sports. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the critical role that healthcare professionals, primarily surgeons, have in guiding families through the decision-making process regarding their children's participation in contact sports.

A diffusion tensor imaging comparison of white matter development in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis to neurotypical infants.

PURPOSE: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) is associated with neurocognitive deficits, and intervention at infancy is standard of care to limit the negative effects of NSC on brain development. In this study, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was implemented to investigate white matter microstructure in infants with NSC undergoing cranial vault remodeling, and a comparison was made with white matter development in neurotypical controls. METHODS: Infants presenting with NSC (n = 12) underwent DTI scans before and after cranial vault remodeling. Neurotypical infants (n = 5), age matched to NSC patients at preoperative scans, were compared to preoperative DTI scans. Pre- and postoperative NSC scans were compared in aggregate, and the sagittal synostosis (n = 8) patients were evaluated separately. Finally, neurotypical infants from the University of North Carolina/University of New Mexico Baby Connectome Project (BCP), who underwent DTI scans at timepoints matching the NSC pre- and postoperative DTI scans, were analyzed (n = 9). Trends over the same time period were compared between NSC and BCP scans. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between preoperative NSC scans and controls. White matter development was more limited in NSC patients than in BCP patients, with microstructural parameters of the corpus body and genu and inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi consistently lagging behind developmental changes observed in healthy patients. CONCLUSION: Infant white matter development appears more limited in NSC patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling relative to that in neurotypical controls. Further investigation is needed to explore these differences and the specific effects of early surgical intervention.

Perceived Age and Gender Perception Using Facial Recognition Software Following Facial Feminization Surgery.

Measures of success for facial feminization surgery (FFS) have previously included improved rates of external gender perception as female and patient-reported outcome measures. In this study, we used artificial intelligence facial recognition software to objectively evaluate the effects of FFS on both perceived gender and age among male-to-female transgender patients, as well as their relationship with patient facial satisfaction. Standardized frontal preoperative and postoperative images of 27 transgender women undergoing FFS were analyzed by Amazon's AI facial recognition software to determine gender, femininity confidence score, and perceived age. Female gender-typing, improvement in gender-typing (preoperatively to postoperatively), and femininity confidence scores were analyzed. To assess patient satisfaction, FACE-Q modules were completed postoperatively. Preoperatively, FFS images were perceived as female 48.1% of the time, and postoperatively, this improved to 74.1% ( P =0.05). Femininity confidence scores improved from a mean score of 0.04 preoperatively to 0.39 postoperatively ( P =0.003). FFS was associated with a decrease in perceived age relative to the patient's true age (-2.4 y, P <0.001), with older patients experiencing greater reductions. Pearson correlation matrix found no significant relationship between improved female gender typing and patient facial satisfaction. Undergoing surgery at a younger age was associated with higher overall facial satisfaction ( r =-0.6, P =0.01). Transfeminine patients experienced improvements in satisfaction with facial appearance, perceived gender, and decreases in perceived age following FFS. Notably, patient satisfaction was not directly associated with improved AI-gender typing, suggesting that other factors may influence patient satisfaction.

Quantitative Analysis of Morphometric Changes in Feminization Rhinoplasty Utilizing a Standardized Forehead-Rhinoplasty Technique.

Background: Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed facial gender-affirming surgeries (FGASs) for transgender females, but well-established morphometric parameters describing feminizing nasal changes do not exist. Objectives: Describe the author's technique for feminization rhinoplasty, analyze the changes in 3-dimensional nasal anthropomorphic parameters, and describe patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Three-dimensional photogrammetric evaluation was performed both preoperatively and postoperatively in transgender female patients who underwent FGAS. Measurements assessed included the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, dorsal height, mid-dorsal width, alar width, nasal tip width, and tip projection. Patients were surveyed preoperatively and postoperatively using the FACE-Q Nose module. Paired t-tests were utilized to assess changes in postoperative measurements and FACE-Q Nose satisfaction scores. Results: Twenty patients underwent FGAS during the study period. The average time between surgery and postoperative 3-dimensional images was 13.6 ± 6.8 months. The nasofrontal angle increased by 8.2° (148.0 ± 7.4° to 156.1 ± 6.7°, P < .001) and tip projection increased by 0.017 (0.58 ± 0.03 to 0.60 ± 0.04, P < .01). Dorsal height, mid-dorsal width, and tip width all decreased significantly (P < .05). There were significant improvements in patients' "Satisfaction with Nose," "Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall," "Psychological Function," and "Social Function" on FACE-Q. One revision rhinoplasty was performed, and no documented surgical complications were reported. Conclusions: There were statistically significant changes in the nasofrontal angle, tip projection, dorsal height, mid-dorsal width, and tip width in patients receiving feminization rhinoplasty. These data may help surgeons with preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making.

Quantifying Facial Feminization Surgery's Impact: Focus on Patient Facial Satisfaction.

Background: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) has been associated with improving gender dysphoria in transgender patients. This study aimed to quantify the impact of surgery on patient facial satisfaction, using the FACE-Q and a quality-of-life (QoL) survey. Methods: Transgender female patients were recruited to complete the FACE-Q and the World Health Organization's QoL Scale-Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) if they were planning to or had undergone FFS at our institution. FACE-Q modules completed included "Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall," individual facial attributes (forehead/eyebrows, nose, cheeks, cheekbone, chin, jawline, and neck), and the WHOQOL-BREF, which assesses patient QoL through four domains (physical, psychological, social relations, and environment). Both matched and unmatched analyses of preoperative versus postoperative cohorts were performed. Results: Overall, 48 patients participated in our study and completed 31 FACE-Q surveys preoperatively and 37 postoperatively. On average, patients were 37.2 ± 12.5 years old. FACE-Q scores increased significantly for all facial attributes and for Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall between cohorts (P < 0.05). The facial attribute with the greatest increase in satisfaction was the jawline, followed by the nose. The WHOQOL-BREF's psychological and physical domains both improved significantly (P < 0.05). Wait time for surgery of less than 6 months (b = 22.42, P = 0.02) was associated with higher overall facial satisfaction, whereas age at surgery (b = -1.04, P < 0.01) was associated with lower overall facial satisfaction. Conclusions: Transgender female patients experienced significant improvements in facial satisfaction and QoL after FFS. Undergoing surgery at a younger age and shorter wait times for surgery were associated with increased overall facial satisfaction.