ImmunoPET Imaging of αvß6 Expression Using an Engineered Anti-αvß6 Cys-diabody Site-Specifically Radiolabeled with Cu-64: Considerations for Optimal Imaging with Antibody Fragments.

PURPOSE: Increased expression of the αvß6 integrin correlates with advanced tumor grade and poor clinical outcome, identifying αvß6 as a prognostic indicator and an attractive target for molecular imaging. This work investigated the ability of a disulfide-stabilized [64Cu]NOTA-αvß6 cys-diabody to image αvß6 expression in vivo using a nu/nu mouse model bearing human melanoma xenografts and positron-emission tomography. PROCEDURES: Small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, quantitative ROI analysis, and ex vivo biodistribution were conducted to ascertain tumor uptake and organ distribution of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvß6 cys-diabody. Immunohistochemical staining of tumors and mouse organs and immunoreactivity assays were utilized to correlate in vivo and ex vivo observations. RESULTS: PET imaging of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvß6 cys-diabody revealed low tumor uptake at 24 h p.i. in DX3Puroß6 tumors (2.69 ± 0.45 %ID/g) with comparable results found in the DX3Puro tumors (2.24 ± 0.15 %ID/g). Quantitative biodistribution confirmed that DX3Puroß6 tumor uptake was highest at 24 h p.i. (4.63 ± 0.18 %ID/g); however, uptake was also observed in the stomach (4.84 ± 2.99 %ID/g), small intestines (4.50 ± 1.69 %ID/g), large intestines (4.73 ± 0.97 %ID/g), gallbladder (6.04 ± 1.88 %ID/g), and lungs (3.89 ± 0.69 %ID/g). CONCLUSIONS: Small-animal PET imaging was successful in visualizing αvß6-positive tumor uptake of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvß6 cys-diabody. Cys-diabody cross-reactivity was observed between human and murine αvß6 and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the presence of an endogenous αvß6 antigen sink, which led to suboptimal tumor contrast in this mouse model. Future investigations will focus on dose escalation studies to overcome the endogenous antigen sink while increasing DX3Puroß6 tumor uptake.

High-Throughput Approaches to the Development of Molecular Imaging Agents.

Molecular imaging allows for the visualization of changes at the cellular level in diseases such as cancer. A successful molecular imaging agent must rely on disease-selective targets and ligands that specifically interact with those targets. Unfortunately, the translation of novel target-specific ligands into the clinic has been frustratingly slow with limitations including the complex design and screening approaches for ligand identification, as well as their subsequent optimization into useful imaging agents. This review focuses on combinatorial library approaches towards addressing these two challenges, with particular focus on phage display and one-bead one-compound (OBOC) libraries. Both of these peptide-based techniques have proven successful in identifying new ligands for cancer-specific targets and some of the success stories will be highlighted. New developments in screening methodology and sequencing technology have pushed the bounds of phage display and OBOC even further, allowing for even faster and more robust discovery of novel ligands. The combination of multiple high-throughput technologies will not only allow for more accurate identification, but also faster affinity maturation, while overall streamlining the process of translating novel ligands into clinical imaging agents.

The Effect of Bi-Terminal PEGylation of an Integrin αvß6-Targeted ¹8F Peptide on Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Uptake.

UNLABELLED: Radiotracers based on the peptide A20FMDV2 selectively target the cell surface receptor integrin αvß6. This integrin has been identified as a prognostic indicator correlating with the severity of disease for several challenging malignancies. In previous studies of A20FMDV2 peptides labeled with 4-(18)F-fluorobenzoic acid ((18)F-FBA), we have shown that the introduction of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) improves pharmacokinetics, including increased uptake in αvß6-expressing tumors. The present study evaluated the effect of site-specific C-terminal or dual (N- and C-terminal) PEGylation, yielding (18)F-FBA-A20FMDV2-PEG28 (4) and (18)F-FBA-PEG28-A20FMDV2-PEG28 (5), on αvß6-targeted tumor uptake and pharmacokinetics. The results are compared with (18)F-FBA -labeled A20FMDV2 radiotracers (1- 3) bearing either no PEG or different PEG units at the N terminus. METHODS: The radiotracers were prepared and radiolabeled on solid phase. Using 3 cell lines, DX3puroß6 (αvß6+), DX3puro (αvß6-), and BxPC-3 (αvß6+), we evaluated the radiotracers in vitro (serum stability; cell binding and internalization) and in vivo in mouse models bearing paired DX3puroß6-DX3puro and, for 5, BxPC-3 xenografts. RESULTS: The size and location of the PEG units significantly affected αvß6 targeting and pharmacokinetics. Although the C-terminally PEGylated 4 showed some improvements over the un-PEGylated (18)F-FBA-A20FMDV2 (1), it was the bi-terminally PEGylated 5 that displayed the more favorable combination of high αvß6 affinity, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic profile. In vitro, 5 bound to αvß6-expressing DX3puroß6 and BxPC-3 cells with 60.5% ± 3.3% and 48.8% ± 8.3%, respectively, with a significant fraction of internalization (37.2% ± 4.0% and 37.6% ± 4.1% of total radioactivity, respectively). By comparison, in the DX3puro control 5: showed only 3.0% ± 0.5% binding and 0.9% ± 0.2% internalization. In vivo, 5: maintained high, αvß6-directed binding in the paired DX3puroß6-DX3puro model (1 h: DX3puroß6, 2.3 ± 0.2 percentage injected dose per gram [%ID/g]; DX3puroß6/DX3puro ratio, 6.5:1; 4 h: 10.7:1). In the pancreatic BxPC-3 model, uptake was 4.7 ± 0.9 %ID/g (1 h) despite small tumor sizes (20-80 mg). CONCLUSION: The bi-PEGylated radiotracer 5 showed a greatly improved pharmacokinetic profile, beyond what was predicted from individual N- or C-terminal PEGylation. It appears that the 2 PEG units acted synergistically to result in an improved metabolic profile including high αvß6+ tumor uptake and retention.

Characterization and evaluation of (64)Cu-labeled A20FMDV2 conjugates for imaging the integrin αvß 6.

PURPOSE: The integrin αvß6 is overexpressed in a variety of aggressive cancers and serves as a prognosis marker. This study describes the conjugation, radiolabeling, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of four chelators to determine the best candidate for (64)Cu radiolabeling of A20FMDV2, an αvß6 targeting peptide. PROCEDURES: Four chelators were conjugated onto PEG28-A20FMDV2 (1): 11-carboxymethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane-4-methanephosphonic acid (CB-TE1A1P), 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA), and 4,4'-((3,6,10,13,16,19-hexazazbicyclo[6.6.6]ico-sane-1,8-diylbis(aza-nediyl))bis(methylene)dibenzoic acid (BaBaSar). All peptides were radiolabeled with (64)Cu in ammonium acetate buffer at pH 6 and formulated to pH 7.2 in PBS for use. The radiotracers were evaluated using in vitro cell binding and internalization assays and serum stability assays. In vivo studies conducted include blocking, biodistribution, and small animal PET imaging. Autoradiography and histology were also conducted. RESULTS: All radiotracers were radiolabeled in good radiochemical purity (>95 %) under mild conditions (37-50 °C for 15 min) with high specific activity (0.58-0.60 Ci/µmol). All radiotracers demonstrated αvß6-directed cell binding (>46 %) with similar internalization levels (>23 %). The radiotracers (64)Cu-CB-TE1A1P-1 and (64)Cu-BaBaSar-1 showed improved specificity for the αvß6 positive tumor in vivo over (64)Cu-DOTA-1 and (64)Cu-NOTA-1 (+/- tumor uptake ratios-3.82 +/- 0.44, 3.82 ± 0.41, 2.58 ± 0.58, and 1.29 ± 0.14, respectively). Of the four radiotracers, (64)Cu-NOTA-1 exhibited the highest liver uptake (10.83 ± 0.1 % ID/g at 4 h). CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully conjugated, radiolabeled, and assessed the four chelates CB-TE1A1P, DOTA, NOTA, and BaBaSar both in vitro and in vivo. However, the data suggests no clear "best candidate" for the (64)Cu-radiolabeling of A20FMDV2, but instead a trade-off between the different properties (e.g., stability, selectivity, pharmacokinetics, etc.) with no obvious effects of the individual chelators.