Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.

OBJECTIVES: For patients presenting with adnexal mass, it is important to correctly distinguish whether the mass is benign or malignant for the purpose of precise and timely referral and implication of correct line of management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Risk of malignancy Indexes (RMI) 1-4, Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in differentiating the adnexal mass into benign and malignant. METHODS: A retrospective study using 155 patients diagnosed with adnexal mass between January 2014 to December 2014 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. The patient records were assessed for age, menopausal status, serum CA125 and HE4 levels, ultrasound characteristics of the pelvic mass and the final pathological diagnosis of the mass. RMI1, RMI2, RMI3, RMI4, ROMA were calculated for each patient and the sensitivity, specificity and the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were determined for each test to evaluate their performance. RESULTS: Among 155 patients with adnexal masses meeting inclusion criteria, 120 (77.4%) were benign, 8 (5.2%) borderline and 27 (17.4%) were malignant. RMI2 and RMI4 had the highest sensitivity (66.7%) while HE4 had the highest specificity (96.9%).Although ROMA had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.886 it was not found to be statistically superior to the other tests. For epithelial ovarian cancers, ROMA (80%), HE4 (96.9%) and RMI 4 (0.868) had the highest sensitivity, specificity and AUC respectively however, the AUC characteristics were not statistically significant between any groups. Compared to the postmenopausal group (sensitivity 72.2-77.8%) all the tests showed lower sensitivity (42.9%) for the premenopausal group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: RMI 1-4, ROMA and HE4 were all found to be useful for differentiating benign/borderline adnexal masses from malignant ones for deciding optimal therapy, however no test was found to be significantly better than the other. None were able to differentiate between benign and borderline tumors. All of the tests demonstrated increased sensitivity when borderline tumors were considered low-risk, and when only epithelial ovarian cancers were considered.

Single Chemosensor for Double Analytes: Spectrophotometric Sensing of Cu(2+) and Fluorogenic Sensing of Al(3+) Under Aqueous Conditions.

(E)-N-((8-Hydroxy-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydropyrido-[3,2,1-ij]-quinolin-9-yl)methylene)-4-tert-butyl -benzhydrazide has been developed as a single, dual-functional chemosensor. The chemosensor showed a good selectivity and sensitivity toward to Al(3+) and Cu(2+) at a low detection limit, respectively. Theoretical calculations have also been carried out to understand the configuration of the complexes.

[Evaluation of insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes with euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes (T1DM) with euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. METHODS: Eight cases of newly diagnosed T1DM and 8 cases of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were selected. Their insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was evaluated with euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp after 2 week insulin intensive treatment and compared with that of 10 healthy volunteers (normal control group, NC group). RESULTS: Age, BMI, fasting insulin (FIns), fasting C-peptide in the T1DM group were significantly lower than those in the NC group, while waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C were not significantly different between the T1DM and NC groups. Age, BMI, WHR, FIns, fasting C-peptide, SBP, TC, TG in the T1DM group were significantly lower than those in the T2DM group. The ISI of the NC, T1DM and T2DM groups were 12. 83 +/- 1.09, 9.95 +/-0.50, 3.80 +/- 0.20, respectively. There was significant difference among the three groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ISI in T1DM was significantly lower than that in NC group, but higher than that in T2DM.

[Evaluation of insulin secretion and insulin resistance by hyperglycemic clamp in Graves disease patients with impaired glucose tolerance].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the state of insulin secretion and insulin resistance in patients of Graves disease (GD) with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) by hyperglycemic clamp. METHODS: Six cases of Graves disease with IGT were selected as GD + IGT group and ten healthy volunteers as normal control group (NC group). All the subjects were required to fast for 12 hours and then underwent hyperglycemic clamp to assay insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GAD-A) was tested in all the subjects. RESULTS: Insulin secretion in GD + IGT group was significantly higher than that in NC group. The 1st phase insulin secretion (1PH) was (636.31 +/- 105.54) mIU/L vs (233.56 +/- 21.33) mIU/L, P = 0.001. The 2nd phase insulin secretion (2PH) was (146.68 +/- 25.00) mIU/L vs (67.06 +/- 6.23) mIU/L, P = 0.03. The maximal insulin secretion during 120 - 150 minutes (Ins(120 - 150)) was (195.05 +/- 32.94) mIU/L vs (87.64 +/- 9.78) mIU/L, P = 0.04. The hyperglycemic clamp insulin sensitivity index (average glucose metabolic rate during 120 - 150 minutes/Ins(120 - 150)) was significantly lower in GD + IGT group than that in NC group (11.52 +/- 1.90 vs 21.72 +/- 3.25, P = 0.04). GAD-A was negative in all subjects. CONCLUSION: Cases of GD with IGT show significant insulin resistance with compensated elevated insulin secretion.

[Evaluation of first phase insulin secretion by a nateglinide-intravenous glucose insulin release test in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the function of the first phase of insulin secretion of pancreatic B cells in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics using nateglinide-intravenous glucose insulin release test (NG-IVGIRT). METHODS: NG-IVGIRT and intravenous glucose insulin release test (IVGIRT) were done in 8 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and NG-IVGIRT was done in 8 normal people. Insulin and glucose of blood were determined at - 15, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min in NG-IVGIRT or IVGIRT. RESULTS: The response of 0 - 10 min insulin to NG-IVGIRT was significantly higher than that to IVGIRT in the diabetics. The response of insulin to NG-IVGIRT in the normal controls was much higher than that in the diabetics. The area under curve (AUC) of insulin to NG-IVGIRT was apparently elevated and the AUC of glucose to NG-IVGIRT reduced in the normal controls as compared with those in the diabetics. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that the reserve of first phase insulin secretion in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics could be provoked in some degree by NG-IVGIRT and there was a big difference in the reserve of the first phase of insulin secretion provoked by NG-IVGIRT between newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics and normal people.