Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Ann ; 52(9): e357-e362, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37695282

ABSTRACT

The application of fecal calprotectin in the relapse of inflammatory bowel disease remains uncertain in children and adolescents. We systematically searched the common databases for eligible studies. Judgment of diagnostic accuracy included pooled sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Ultimately, a total of 414 participants from six studies were included. The combined sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.85 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.79), 0.71 (95% CI = 0.52 to 0.85), 2.95 (95% CI = 1.71 to 5.09), and 0.21 (95% CI = 0.08 to 0.51), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85, and the DOR was 14.14 (95% CI = 4.46 to 44.80). Our study showed that fecal calprotectin as a biomarker to predict the clinical relapse of inflammatory bowel disease during remission in children and adolescents is effective and worth applying. [Pediatr Ann. 2023;52(9):e357-e362.].


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Chronic Disease , Feces , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex
2.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 34(9): 892-901, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427885

ABSTRACT

Mucosal healing has been considered a treatment goal for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. To compare the accuracy of fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin in the judgment of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis, a meta-analysis was performed. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for the studies on fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin predicting mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis. The comprehensive sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were calculated to evaluate the accuracy. By analyzing 22 publications, we found that the combined sensitivity and specificity of fecal immunochemical test were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81), respectively. The combined sensitivity and specificity of fecal calprotectin were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.84), respectively. The area under the curve values of the fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were 0.88 and 0.85, respectively. Consequently, fecal immunochemical test had higher sensitivity in predicting mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients, while fecal calprotectin had higher specificity. Compared with fecal calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test was more accurate in judging mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Humans , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/analysis , Biomarkers/analysis , Intestinal Mucosa/chemistry , Sensitivity and Specificity , Feces/chemistry , Colonoscopy , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...