Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost.

PURPOSE: The focal radiotherapy (RT) boost technique was shown in a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) to improve prostate cancer outcomes without increasing toxicity. This technique relies on the accurate delineation of prostate tumors on MRI. A recent prospective study evaluated radiation oncologists' accuracy when asked to delineate prostate tumors on MRI and demonstrated high variability in tumor contours. We sought to evaluate the impact of contour variability and inaccuracy on predicted clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that radiation oncologists' contour inaccuracies would yield meaningfully worse clinical outcomes. MATERIALS & METHODS: 45 radiation oncologists and 2 expert radiologists contoured prostate tumors on 30 patient cases. Of these cases, those with CT simulation or diagnostic CT available were selected for analysis. A knowledge-based planning model was developed to generate focal RT boost plans for each contour per the RCT protocol. Probability of biochemical failure (BF) was determined using a model from the RCT. The primary metric evaluated was delta BF (ΔBF = Participant BF - Expert BF). An absolute increase in BF ≥5% was considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: 8 patient cases and 394 target volumes for focal RT boost planning were included in this analysis. In general, participant plans were associated with worse predicted clinical outcomes compared to the expert plan, with an average absolute increase in BF of 4.3%. 37% of participant plans were noted to have an absolute increase in BF of 5% or more. CONCLUSION: Radiation oncologists' attempts to contour tumor targets for focal RT boost are frequently inaccurate enough to yield meaningfully inferior clinical outcomes for patients.

Comparing brass mesh to tissue equivalent bolus materials for volumetric modulated arc therapy chest wall irradiation.

PURPOSE: To compare the superficial dose when using brass mesh bolus (BMB), no bolus, or 3 mm tissue-equivalent bolus with a pseudo-flash volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) breast treatment planning technique. METHODS: Two different beam arrangements for right-sided irradiation and one beam arrangement for bilateral irradiation were planned on an inhomogeneous thorax phantom in accordance with our clinical practice for VMAT postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Plans were optimized using pseudo-flash and representative critical organ optimization structures were used to shape the dose. Plans were delivered without bolus, with 3 mm tissue-equivalent bolus (TEB), or with one-layer BMB. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) and radiochromic film measurements were taken and analyzed to determine the superficial dose in each case and the relative enhancement from the no bolus delivery. RESULTS: Superficial dose measured with OSLDs was found to be 76.4 ± 4.5%, 103.0 ± 6.1%, and 98.1 ± 5.8% of prescription for no physical bolus (NB), TEB, and BMB, respectively. Superficial dose was observed to increase from lateral to medial points when measured with film. However, the relative increase in superficial dose from NB was consistent across the profile with an increase of 43 ± 2.1% and 34 ± 3.3% of prescription for TEB and BMB, respectively. The results are in good agreement with expectations from the literature and the experience with tangential radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Three millimeter TEB and one-layer BMB were shown to provide similar enhancement to the superficial dose compared to delivery without bolus. BMB, which does not significantly affect dose at depth and is more conformal to the patient surface, is an acceptable alternative to 3 mm TEB for chest wall PMRT patients treated with pseudo-flash PMRT.

Adaptive replanning using cone beam CT for deformation of original CT simulation.

BACKGROUND: During a course of radiation therapy, anatomical changes such as a decrease in tumour size or weight loss can trigger the need for repeating a computed tomography (CT) simulation scan in order to generate a new treatment plan. This adaptive approach requires a separate appointment for an additional CT scan which generates additional burden, cost, and radiation exposure for patients. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we present a case of a head and neck cancer patient who required palliative radiation for a large neck mass. During treatment, he had a remarkable response which required a replan due to rapid tumour downsizing. In this case, we used a novel technique to avoid repeating the planning CT simulation by using a mid-treatment high-quality cone beam CT (CBCT) to deform the secondary image (plan CT) of the original planning CT and generate a new adapted treatment plan. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to our knowledge using a Halcyon CBCT to deform the original planning CT in order to generate a new radiation treatment plan, and this novel technique represents a new potential method of adaptive replanning for select patients.

Five Simultaneous Primary Tumors in a Single Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) are present when a patient is diagnosed with more than one primary malignancy and when each tumor is histologically unrelated to the others. MPMs are considered synchronous when they present within 6 months of one another. Here, we report the case of a 57-year-old woman with a past medical history significant for melanoma in 1988, who presented in 2014 with 5 distinct tumors within 4 months: malignant melanoma of the right popliteal fossa, invasive lobular breast carcinoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, and a giant cell tumor of tendon sheath/pigmented villonodular synovitis. We discuss her treatment and also present a brief review of the literature. The incidence of MPMs appears to be on the rise, which demands an interdisciplinary, multimodal, and personalized approach to care.