Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15163, 2024 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956101

ABSTRACT

To describe the fetal death rate of birth defects (including a broad range of specific defects) and to explore the relationship between fetal deaths from birth defects and a broad range of demographic characteristics. Data was derived from the birth defects surveillance system in Hunan Province, China, 2016-2020. Fetal death refers to the intrauterine death of a fetus at any time during the pregnancy, including medical termination of pregnancy. Fetal death rate is the number of fetal deaths per 100 births (including live births and fetal deaths) in a specified group (unit: %). The fetal death rate of birth defects with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated by the log-binomial method. Crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to examine the relationship between each demographic characteristic and fetal deaths from birth defects. This study included 847,755 births, and 23,420 birth defects were identified. A total of 11,955 fetal deaths from birth defects were identified, with a fetal death rate of 51.05% (95% CI 50.13-51.96). 15.78% (1887 cases) of fetal deaths from birth defects were at a gestational age of < 20 weeks, 59.05% (7059 cases) were at a gestational age of 20-27 weeks, and 25.17% (3009 cases) were at a gestational age of ≥ 28 weeks. Fetal death rate of birth defects was higher in females than in males (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.18-1.32), in rural than in urban areas (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.36-1.50), in maternal age 20-24 years (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.25-1.47), and ≥ 35 years (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.11-1.29) compared to maternal age of 25-29 years, in diagnosed by chromosomal analysis than ultrasound (OR = 6.24, 95% CI 5.15-7.55), and lower in multiple births than in singletons (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.36-0.47). The fetal death rate of birth defects increased with the number of previous pregnancies (χ2trend = 49.28, P < 0.01), and decreased with the number of previous deliveries (χ2trend = 4318.91, P < 0.01). Many fetal deaths were associated with birth defects. We found several demographic characteristics associated with fetal deaths from birth defects, which may be related to the severity of the birth defects, economic and medical conditions, and parental attitudes toward birth defects.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities , Fetal Death , Humans , China/epidemiology , Female , Congenital Abnormalities/mortality , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Adult , Fetal Death/etiology , Male , Gestational Age , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , Maternal Age , Odds Ratio
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(15): e37691, 2024 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608109

ABSTRACT

To describe the epidemiology of congenital malformations of the external ear (CMEE). Data were obtained from the Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2016 to 2020. The prevalence of CMEEs is defined as the number of cases per 1000 fetuses (births and deaths at 28 weeks of gestation and beyond) (unit: ‰). Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by the log-binomial method. Chi-square trend tests (χ2trend) were used to determine trends in prevalence by year. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to examine the association of sex, residence, and maternal age with CMEEs. Our study included 847,755 fetuses, and 14,459 birth defects were identified, including 1227 CMEEs (accounted for 8.49% of birth defects). The prevalences of birth defects and CMEEs were 17.06‰ (95%CI: 16.78-17.33) and 1.45‰ (95%CI: 1.37-1.53), respectively. A total of 185 microtia-anotias were identified, accounting for 15.08% of CMEEs, with a prevalence of 0.22‰ (95%CI: 0.19-0.25). And 1042 other CMEEs were identified, accounting for 84.92% of CMEEs. From 2016 to 2020, the prevalences of birth defects were 18.20‰, 18.00‰, 16.31‰, 16.03‰, and 16.47‰, respectively, showing a downward trend (χ2trend =8.45, P < .01); the prevalences of CMEEs were 1.19‰, 1.62‰, 1.80‰, 1.21‰, and 1.35‰, respectively, with no significant trend (χ2trend =0.09, P = .77). CMEEs were more common in males than females (1.60‰ vs 1.27‰, OR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.12-1.41), in urban areas than in rural areas (1.77‰ vs 1.23‰, OR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.29-1.62). The prevalences of CMEEs for maternal age < 20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, and ≥ 35 were 1.75‰, 1.27‰, 1.44‰, 1.47‰, and 1.58‰, respectively, with no significant difference (P > .05, reference: 25-29). Most CMEEs were diagnosed by clinical examinations (92.34%), and most CMEEs were diagnosed postpartum (within 7 days) (96.25%). In summary, we have presented the epidemiology of CMEEs in Hunan Province, China. CMEEs were more common in males than females, in urban areas than rural areas, whereas there was no significant difference in prevalence of CMEEs by maternal age. We inferred that CMEEs may be mainly related to genetics, and the mechanism needs to be examined in the future.


Subject(s)
Congenital Microtia , Female , Male , Humans , China/epidemiology , Ear, External , Fetus , Maternal Age
3.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1037, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore risk factors for birth defects (including a broad range of specific defects). METHODS: Data were derived from the Population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2014-2020. The surveillance population included all live births, stillbirths, infant deaths, and legal termination of pregnancy between 28 weeks gestation and 42 days postpartum. The prevalence of birth defects (number of birth defects per 1000 infants) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (method: Forward, Wald, α = 0.05) and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were used to identify risk factors for birth defects. We used the presence or absence of birth defects (or specific defects) as the dependent variable, and eight variables (sex, residence, number of births, paternal age, maternal age, number of pregnancies, parity, and maternal household registration) were entered as independent variables in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Our study included 143,118 infants, and 2984 birth defects were identified, with a prevalence of 20.85% (95%CI: 20.10-21.60). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that seven variables (except for parity) were associated with birth defects (or specific defects). There were five factors associated with the overall birth defects. The risk factors included males (OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.39-1.61), multiple births (OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.18-1.76), paternal age < 20 (OR = 2.20, 95%CI: 1.19-4.09) or 20-24 (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.42-1.94), maternal age 30-34 (OR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.29) or > = 35 (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.33-1.81), and maternal non-local household registration (OR = 2.96, 95%CI: 2.39-3.67). Some factors were associated with the specific defects. Males were risk factors for congenital metabolic disorders (OR = 3.86, 95%CI: 3.15-4.72), congenital limb defects (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.14-1.58), and congenital kidney and urinary defects (OR = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.65-3.34). Rural areas were risk factors for congenital metabolic disorders (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.01-1.44). Multiple births were risk factors for congenital heart defects (OR = 2.09, 95%CI: 1.55-2.82), congenital kidney and urinary defects (OR = 2.14, 95%CI: 1.05-4.37), and cleft lip and/or palate (OR = 2.85, 95%CI: 1.32-6.15). Paternal age < 20 was the risk factor for congenital limb defects (OR = 3.27, 95%CI: 1.10-9.71), 20-24 was the risk factor for congenital heart defects (OR = 1.64, 95%CI: 1.24-2.17), congenital metabolic disorders (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.11-2.21), congenital limb defects (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 1.14-2.29), and congenital ear defects (OR = 2.13, 95%CI: 1.17-3.89). Maternal age < 20 was the risk factor for cleft lip and/or palate (OR = 3.14, 95%CI: 1.24-7.95), 30-34 was the risk factor for congenital limb defects (OR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.09-1.73), >=35 was the risk factor for congenital heart defects (OR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.14-1.99), congenital limb defects (OR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.41-2.78), and congenital ear defects (OR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.06-3.10). Number of pregnancies = 2 was the risk factor for congenital nervous system defects (OR = 2.27, 95%CI: 1.19-4.32), >=4 was the risk factor for chromosomal abnormalities (OR = 2.03, 95%CI: 1.06-3.88) and congenital nervous system defects (OR = 3.03, 95%CI: 1.23-7.47). Maternal non-local household registration was the risk factor for congenital heart defects (OR = 3.57, 95%CI: 2.54-5.03), congenital metabolic disorders (OR = 1.89, 95%CI: 1.06-3.37), congenital limb defects (OR = 2.94, 95%CI: 1.86-4.66), and congenital ear defects (OR = 3.26, 95%CI: 1.60-6.65). CONCLUSION: In summary, several risk factors were associated with birth defects (including a broad range of specific defects). One risk factor may be associated with several defects, and one defect may be associated with several risk factors. Future studies should examine the mechanisms. Our findings have significant public health implications as some factors are modifiable or avoidable, such as promoting childbirths at the appropriate age, improving the medical and socio-economic conditions of non-local household registration residents, and devoting more resources to some specific defects in high-risk groups, which may help reducing birth defects in China.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Congenital Abnormalities , Heart Defects, Congenital , Metabolic Diseases , Pregnancy , Male , Infant , Female , Humans , Adult , Logistic Models , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...