ABSTRACT
Objective: To observe the effect of implementing standardized flow management in enteral nutrition therapy for critically ill patients. Methods: We selected 241 critically ill patients admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023. Patients with enteral nutrition without standard process management were set as the control group (n = 109), while those with enteral nutrition and standard process management were set as the observation group (n = 132). The total protein, albumin, prealbumin, and hemoglobin were compared between the two groups on the 7th and 14th day of nutritional therapy. Immune indicators (IgM, IgA, and IgG), NUTRIC score, and the incidence of infectious complications were compared between the two groups. Results: On the 7th and 14th day of treatment, the total protein, albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, and immune indicators in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < .05). On the 7th and 14th day of treatment, the NUTRIC score of the observation group was higher than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P < .05). The incidence of infectious complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusion: Implementing standardized process management of EN for critically ill patients improves total protein, albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, immune indexes, NUTRIC score, and nutritional status, while reducing the incidence of infectious complications. These findings offer valuable insights for clinical practice and advocate for practical application.
