Investigation of the Inhibitory Effect of Simvastatin on the Metabolism of Lidocaine Both in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine has cardiovascular and neurologic toxicity, which is dose-dependent. Due to CYP3A4-involved metabolism, lidocaine may be prone to drug-drug interactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Given statins have the possibility of combination with lidocaine in the clinic, we established in vitro models to assess the effect of statins on the metabolism of lidocaine. Further pharmacokinetic alterations of lidocaine and its main metabolite, monoethylglycinexylidide in rats influenced by simvastatin, were investigated. RESULTS: In vitro study revealed that simvastatin, among the statins, had the most significant inhibitory effect on lidocaine metabolism with IC50 of 39.31 µM, 50 µM and 15.77 µM for RLM, HLM and CYP3A4.1, respectively. Consistent with in vitro results, lidocaine concomitantly used with simvastatin in rats was associated with 1.2-fold AUC(0-t), 1.2-fold AUC(0-∞), and 20%-decreased clearance for lidocaine, and 1.4-fold Cmax for MEGX compared with lidocaine alone. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these results implied that simvastatin could evidently inhibit the metabolism of lidocaine both in vivo and in vitro. Accordingly, more attention and necessary therapeutic drug monitoring should be paid to patients with the concomitant coadministration of lidocaine and simvastatin so as to avoid unexpected toxicity.

Functional characterization of 27 CYP3A4 variants on macitentan metabolism in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: Macitentan is a new choice for pulmonary hypertension treatment which is converted to active metabolite ACT132577 by human cytochrome P450 3A4. Human cytochrome P450 3A4 often occurred gene mutations. Gene polymorphism might cause a variety of changes of protein expression and thus give rise to metabolic difference. The aim of this study was to investigate the catalytic characteristics of 27 CYP3A4 protein variants on the metabolism of macitentan in vitro. METHOD: The incubation mixtures (final volume of 200 µl in 1 m PBS) consisted of 1 pmol wild-type CYP3A4.1 or other CYP3A4 protein variants, 2.38 pmol CYP b5 and macitentan (10-600 µm) with 1 mm NADPH. All specimens were processed using same approach with acetonitrile precipitation. The metabolite of macitentan was analysed by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. KEY FINDING: Most CYP3A4 protein variants (CYP3A4.9, .11, .12, .13, .17, .20, .23, .24, .28, .29, .33, .34) exhibited a sharp decrease, meanwhile nearly one in five variants (CYP3A4.3, .4, .5, .10, .15, .16) showed a significant rise in intrinsic clearance. The relative clearance of CYP3A4 protein variants was ranged from 5.53 to 501.00%. CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven CYP3A4 protein variants displayed different catalytic characteristics towards macitentan in vitro, especially CYP3A4.5, .17, .20, .23. It is important to pay more attention to the dosage of macitentan in order to get better treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Investigation of the effects of axitinib on the pharmacokinetics of loperamide and its main metabolite N-demethylated loperamide in rats by UPLC-MS/MS.

The epidemic of loperamide abuse and misuse in the patients for the alternative to opioids has become an increasing worldwide concern and has led to considerations about the potential for drug-drug interactions between loperamide and other combined drugs, especially inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes, such as axitinib. This study assessed the effects of axitinib on the metabolism of loperamide and its main metabolite N-demethylated loperamide in rats and in rat liver microsomes (RLM), human liver microsomes (HLM) and recombinant human CYP3A4*1. The concentrations of both compounds were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The exposures (AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞) and Cmax) of loperamide and N-demethylated loperamide showed a conspicuous increase when loperamide was co-administered with axitinib. The Tmax of loperamide increased while CLz/F decreased under the influence of axitinib. In vitro, axitinib inhibited loperamide metabolism with the IC50 of 18.34 µM for RLM, 1.705 µM for HLM and 1.604 µM for CYP3A4*1, and it was confirmed as a non-competitive inhibitor in all enzymes. Taken together, the results indicated that axitinib had an obvious inhibitory impact on loperamide metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. Thus, more attention should be paid to the concurrent use of loperamide and axitinib to reduce the risk of unexpected clinical outcomes.

Functional characterization of 27 CYP3A4 protein variants to metabolize regorafenib in vitro.

AIM: Regorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4. The genetic polymorphism of CYP3A4 would contribute to differences in metabolism of regorafenib. Previously, we had discovered several novel CYP3A4 variants. However, the catalytic characteristics of these 27 CYP3A4 variants on oxidizing regorafenib have not being determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the catalytic characteristics of 27 CYP3A4 protein variants on the oxidative metabolism of regorafenib in vitro. METHOD: Wild-type CYP3A4.1 or other variants was incubated with 0.5-20 µmol/L regorafenib for 30 minutes. After sample processing, regorafenib-N-oxide, a primary metabolite, was detected by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system. RESULT: CYP3A4.20 had no detectable enzyme activity compared with wild-type CYP3A4.1; five variants (CYP3A4.5, .16, .19, .24, .29) exhibited similar clearance value with CYP3A4.1; four variants (CYP3A4.14, .15, .28, .31) displayed increased enzymatic activities, while remaining variants showed markedly decreased intrinsic clearance values. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to investigate the function of 27 CYP3A4 protein variants on the metabolism of regorafenib in vitro, and it may provide some valuable information for further research in clinic.