Cost-effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Since the late 1980s, the Taiwanese government has provided all HIV-infected citizens with free access to antiretroviral therapy. Recently, there is controversy as to whether or not free access to expensive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) should be continued for HIV-infected patients. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HAART therapy. METHODS: HAART-associated improvement in survival was obtained by analyzing the follow-up data of all HIV-positive patients identified during April 1984 to March 1997 (pre-HAART era) and May 1997 to April 2003 (HAART era) in Taiwan. Data on quality of life in HIV-positive patients was obtained from a cross-sectional survey of 224 patients using standard gamble method and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF instrument. Information regarding the cost of HAART was obtained from the National Health Insurance (NHI). RESULTS: In 2000, the average annual NHI expenditure on HAART per HIV-positive patient receiving HAART was NT$210,018 (US$6177, at an exchange rate of 34.0 NT$/US$). In the AIDS group, the cost was NT$176,441 (US$5189) per life year gained and NT$241,700 (US$7109) per quality-adjusted life year gained. For non-AIDS patients, the corresponding costs were NT$226,156 (US$6652) and NT$332,582 (US$9782), respectively. These estimates have not yet included the additional cost savings from HAART-associated reduction in hospitalization and use of antimicrobial agents for opportunistic infections, and the additional life years gained from the reduction in HIV transmission under the universal availability of HAART. CONCLUSION: HAART for HIV infection is cost-effective, especially when the societal and epidemiologic factors are considered. We recommend that the policy of providing free HAART to all HIV-infected citizens be continued.

Early empirical glycopeptide therapy for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: impact on the outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether appropriate early empirical glycopeptide therapy improves outcomes of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data for all adult patients with confirmed MRSA bacteraemia diagnosed and treated at National Taiwan University Hospital during the period 1 April 1997-31 March 2001, and followed their survival up to three years. The main outcome measures were MRSA-related death and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: There were 77 MRSA-related deaths among 162 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in MRSA-related deaths between patients receiving glycopeptides before or within 48 h after blood culture (n = 43) (55%, 18/33, non-septic shock group; 90%, 9/10, septic shock group) or those whose glycopeptide therapy was begun more than 48 h after blood culture (n = 119) (37%, 40/107, non-septic shock group; 83%, 10/12, septic shock group) (P = 0.11 and 1.00, respectively). The outcome measure of all-cause mortality from 30 days to 3 years yields similar results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox analysis showed that the length of delay (daily increment) between blood culture sampling and start of glycopeptide therapy did not have a statistically significant impact on MRSA-related death or all-cause 30-day mortality after adjusting for the effect of other variables [adjusted odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.88-1.12; adjusted hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that earlier empirical use of glycopeptide therapy reduces mortality in patients with hospital-acquired MRSA bacteraemia was not supported.