Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Fitness between Patients with Mitral Valve Prolapse and Healthy Peers: Findings from Serial Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.

Individuals with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have exercise intolerance even without mitral valve regurgitation. Mitral valve degeneration may progress with aging. We aimed to evaluate the influence of MVP on the cardiopulmonary function (CPF) of individuals with MVP through serial follow-ups from early to late adolescence. Thirty patients with MVP receiving at least two cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) using a treadmill (MVP group) were retrospectively analyzed. Age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched healthy peers, who also had serial CPETs, were recruited as the control group. The average time from the first CPET to the last CPET was 4.28 and 4.06 years in the MVP and control groups, respectively. At the first CPET, the MVP group had a significantly lower peak rate pressure product (PRPP) than the control group (p = 0.022). At the final CEPT, the MVP group had lower peak metabolic equivalent (MET, p = 0.032) and PRPP (p = 0.031). Moreover, the MVP group had lower peak MET and PRPP as they aged, whereas healthy peers had higher peak MET (p = 0.034) and PRPP (p = 0.047) as they aged. Individuals with MVP had poorer CPF than healthy individuals as they develop from early to late adolescence. It is important for individuals with MVP to receive regular CPET follow-ups.

Comparison of the Results of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing between Healthy Peers and Pediatric Patients with Different Echocardiographic Severity of Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have been reported to have exercise intolerance. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and their physical fitness remain unclear. We aimed to determine the exercise capacity of patients with MVP through the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). We retrospectively collected the data of 45 patients with a diagnosis of MVP. Their CPET and echocardiogram results were compared with 76 healthy individuals as primary outcomes. No significant differences regarding the patient's baseline characteristics and echocardiographic data were found between the two groups, except for the lower body mass index (BMI) of the MVP group. Patients in the MVP group demonstrated a similar peak metabolic equivalent (MET), but a significantly lower peak rate pressure product (PRPP) (p = 0.048). Patients with MVP possessed similar exercise capacity to healthy individuals. The reduced PRPP may indicate compromised coronary perfusion and subtle left ventricular function impairment.