Osimertinib is a dual inhibitor of hepatocellular carcinoma and angiogenesis in an EGFR-independent manner, and synergizes with venetoclax.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of osimertinib on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and angiogenesis, and its combinatory effects with venetoclax in HCC. METHODS: Viability was assessed by flow cytometry of Annexin V in multiple HCC cell lines after drug treatment. In vitro angiogenesis assay was performed using primary human liver tumor associated endothelial cell (HLTEC). HCC-bearing model was generated by subcutaneous implantation of Hep3B cells to investigate the efficacy of osimertinib alone and its combination with venetoclax. RESULTS: Osimertinib significantly induced apoptosis in a panel of HCC cell lines regardless of EGFR expression level. It inhibited capillary network formation and induced apoptosis in HLTEC. Using HCC xenograft mouse model, we further showed that osimertinib at non-toxic dose inhibited tumor growth by ~ 50% and remarkably decreased blood vessel in tumor. Mechanism studies demonstrated that osimertinib acted on HCC cells in an EGFR-independent manner. It decreased level of VEGF and Mcl-1 in HCC cells via suppressed phosphorylation of eIF4E, thus leading to inhibition of eIF4E-mediated translation. Mcl-1 overexpression reversed pro-apoptotic effect of osimertinib, suggesting an important role of Mcl-1 in osimertinib's action in HCC cells. Of note, the combination of osimertinib and venetoclax achieved approximately complete HCC cell death and tumor growth in mice. CONCLUSIONS: We provide pre-clinical evidence that osimertinib is a promising candidate for the treatment of HCC via targeting tumor cells and angiogenesis. The combination of osimertinib and venetoclax is synergistic in inhibiting HCC.

Effectiveness and Safety of an Inactivated Enterovirus 71 Vaccine in Children Aged 6-71 Months in a Phase IV Study.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of a licensed inactivated enterovirus type 71 (EV71) vaccine is needed in a phase IV study with a large population to identify its effectiveness and safety for further application. METHODS: An open-label, controlled trial involving a large population of 155 995 children aged 6-71 months was performed; 40 724 were enrolled in the vaccine group and received 2 doses of inactivated EV71 vaccine at an interval of 1 month, and the remaining children were used as the control group. The EV71-infected cases with hand, foot, and mouth disease were monitored in the vaccine and control groups during a follow-up period of 14 months since the 28th day postinoculation through the local database of the Notifiable Infectious Diseases Network. The effectiveness of the vaccine was estimated by comparing the incidence density in the vaccine group versus that in the control group based upon EV71-infected patients identified via laboratory testing. In parallel, the active and passive surveillance for safety of the vaccine was conducted by home or telephone visits and by using the Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) system, respectively. RESULTS: An overall level of 89.7% (95% confidence interval, 24.0-98.6%) vaccine effectiveness against EV71 infection and a 4.58% rate of reported adverse events were observed. Passive surveillance demonstrated a 0.31% rate of reported common minor reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical protection and safety of the EV71 vaccine were demonstrated in the immunization of a large population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03001986.