Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Br J Neurosurg ; 37(5): 1057-1060, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252289

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is routinely performed for reconstructive purposes and improves rehabilitation. However, the optimal timing of CP remains controversial. This study aimed to assess differences in clinical outcomes following different timings of CP in patients with traumatic brain injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury who underwent CP after DC in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 1 January 2010 to 1 May 2017, and in Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from 1 January 2015, to 1 May 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. According to the timing of CP, patients were divided into an 'early group' (3-6 months) and a 'late group' (6-12 months). The clinical characteristics of patients and postoperative complications occurred within 1-year follow-up were analysed. The neurological function was assessed with Barthel Index (BI). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (58 cases in early group and 42 cases in late group) were included. The median interval between DC and CP was 135 days and 225 days in the early and late CP groups, respectively. The overall complication rate after CP was 16%, and no significant difference in complication rate was observed between the early and late CP groups (17.2% vs.14.3%, p = 0.69). The neurological function was improved in early CP group (pre-CP 85.77 ± 11.61 vs. post-CP 95.34 ± 9.02, p < 0.001, but not in late CP group (pre-CP 82.74 ± 22.82 vs. post-CP 88.93 ± 22.86, p = 0.22). In addition, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the early CP group showed neurological functional improvement in comparison with the late CP group (early vs. late: 74.1% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis further demonstrated that the timing of CP is an independent predictor for neurological outcomes (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.82, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Early CP (3-6 months) following posttraumatic DC was associated with better neurological outcomes than late CP (>6 months).


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Decompressive Craniectomy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Decompressive Craniectomy/adverse effects , Skull/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery
2.
Front Oncol ; 12: 716295, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35719947

ABSTRACT

Inflammation is a hallmark of cancers. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic potential of hematological inflammatory markers in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The clinical data of 99 patients with lower-grade gliomas and 88 patients with GBMs were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cutoff values for peripheral markers were determined by X-tile. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify markers with prognostic significance. Several scoring systems were constructed by combining these prognostic markers. The predictive accuracies of nomograms incorporating these scoring systems were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. GBM patients exhibited higher neutrophil counts (p=0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p<0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p=0.001), as well as lower lymphocyte counts (p=0.023), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p=0.015), and albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) (p=0.003) than those with lower-grade gliomas. Multivariate analysis indicated that a high NLR (> 2.0) (Hazard ratio[HR]=2.519, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.220-5.204, p=0.013), low LMR (< 2.3) (HR=2.268, 95%CI: 1.172-4.386, p=0.015), or low AGR (< 1.7) (HR=2.924, 95%CI: 1.389-6.135, p=0.005) were associated with poor overall survival in GBM patients. The scoring systems of AGR-NLR, AGR-LMR, and LMR-NLR were associated with GBM survival. The nomogram integrating AGR-NLR score had the best efficacy in predicting GBM survival (c-index=0.874). Pretreatment scores of AGR-NLR, AGR-LMR, and LMR-NLR may serve as prognostic factors for GBM patients, and a nomogram integrating AGR-NLR may provide a reliable tool to facilitate personalized preoperative evaluations.

3.
Front Neurol ; 11: 580101, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33117267

ABSTRACT

Background: Inflammation plays an important role in tumorigenesis. Previous studies have reported the prognostic value of several peripheral inflammatory markers in glioma patients, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). However, it still remains unclear whether inflammatory markers can independently predict the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The present study aims to explore the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, the NLR, and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), in patients with GBM. Methods: A comprehensive systemic search and review was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all the relevant literature (published before June 30, 2020) that evaluated the association between any of these inflammatory markers and survival in GBM. Results: There were 2 (634 patients), 3 (723 patients), 2 (237 patients), 8 (1,225 patients), and 3 (505 patients) studies examining the correlation of survival with neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, the NLR, and the PLR, respectively. An elevated NLR and elevated neutrophil and platelet counts were associated with worse overall survival (OS) in GBM patients (NLR: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.15, p = 0.0007; neutrophil count: HR = 1.46, 95% CI:1.16-1.83, p = 0.001; platelet count: HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.42-1.77, p < 0.00001). However, there was no significant association between the PLR or the absolute lymphocyte count and OS in GBM patients. Conclusion: The NLR and the absolute neutrophil and platelet counts may be valuable and convenient peripheral inflammatory markers to evaluate the prognosis of GBM patients. Further prospective studies are needed to verify its reliability.

4.
Front Neurol ; 11: 1036, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33041980

ABSTRACT

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary malignant brain tumor. Carmustine is used by intravenous injection or local implantation in the resection cavity for gliomas, including GBMs. However, the therapeutic potential of carmustine is not well-recognized. This analysis aimed to evaluate the survival benefits of carmustine in glioma patients, especially those with GBM. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding carmustine for glioma treatment were searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1979 to March 2020. Quality assessment was conducted with Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scales (NOS). Statistical analysis was conducted by the Revman 5.3 software. Results: Twenty-two eligible RCTs and cohort studies involving 5,821 glioma patients were included. Overall, glioma patients receiving carmustine as an adjuvant therapy had better progression-free survival [PFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.94, P = 0.002] and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92, P < 0.0001) than those without carmustine treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that the OS benefit was observed in GBM (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.91, P < 0.00001) but not in anaplastic glioma patients (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.70-2.07, P = 0.50). Additionally, both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients who received carmustine treatment showed better OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79-0.95, P = 0.002; HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67-0.89, P = 0.0002, respectively). Both carmustine implantation in resection cavity and intravenous administration significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.92, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, P = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, GBM patients receiving a combined carmustine and temozolomide (TMZ) therapy had longer OS than those receiving TMZ alone (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Carmustine implantation in resection cavity provides survival benefit for GBM patients, and it may be a promising supplement to standard therapeutic protocol by offering a bridge between surgical resection and onset of TMZ therapy.

5.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(4): 104659, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32067852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many studies have evaluated the relationship between N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and its prognostic value in ischemic stroke. However, a widespread consensus has not been reached. Therefore, we completed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of NT-proBNP for mortality and functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: We performed a systematic search and review using the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify literature that reported a correlation between NT-proBNP and mortality and functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients. RESULTS: Eleven studies inclusive of 10,498 patients met the inclusion criteria. Elevated plasma NT-proBNP levels were associated with increased risk of mortality in ischemic stroke patients (all-cause mortality: odds ratio [OR] = 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-3.64, P < .001, I2=74.3%; cardiovascular mortality: OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.55-2.61, P < .001, I2 = 42.6%). In addition, unfavorable functional outcomes were observed in patients with higher levels of NT-proBNP (OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.50, P = .01, I2 = 90.8%) after ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that NT-proBNP could be a predictor of mortality and functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Brain Ischemia/blood , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Stroke/blood , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Brain Ischemia/mortality , Brain Ischemia/therapy , Cause of Death , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/therapy
6.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 13: 265-273, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30666088

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the neuroprotective effect of progesterone administration on severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) for different follow-up periods and administration route by completing a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the Web of Science (from establishment of each to September 1, 2018) was performed to identify original RCTs that evaluated the associations between progesterone treatment and the prognosis of patients with severe TBI. RESULTS: Eight RCTs enrolling 2,251 patients with severe TBI were included. Within 3 months post-injury, patients with progesterone administration had a lower mortality (risk ratio [RR] =0.59; 95% CI [0.42-0.81], P=0.001) and better neurologic outcomes (RR =1.51; 95% CI [1.12-2.02], P=0.007) than those who received placebo. However, these differences did not persist at 6 months post-injury for mortality (RR =0.96; 95% CI [0.65-1.41], P=0.83) or neurologic outcomes (RR =1.09; 95% CI [0.93-1.27], P=0.31). The analysis stratified by administration route showed that beneficial effects were only observed in patients who received progesterone intramuscularly (RR =1.61, 95% CI [1.19-2.18], P=0.002); no benefit was observed with intravenous administration (RR =0.99, 95% CI [0.91-1.07], P=0.75). CONCLUSION: Progesterone administration improved the clinical outcomes of severe TBI patients within 3 months but may not have significant long-term benefits 6 months post-injury.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/drug therapy , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Progesterone/therapeutic use , Humans , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Progesterone/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
8.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(6): e2741, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26871818

ABSTRACT

In spite of the substantial burden of atrial fibrillation and associated elevated ischemic stroke risk in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the role of warfarin in these high-risk patients remains uncertain. Our objective was to clarify the association between warfarin use and risk of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing dialysis.PubMed and Embase from January 1966 to January 2015 were searched to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies, patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis, and reported quantitative estimates of the multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for future stroke associated with warfarin use. We identified 8 studies, with a total of 9539 participants and 706 stroke events. Three studies reported total stroke as primary endpoint and other studies reported ischemic stroke as primary endpoint. Pooling the results showed that warfarin use was associated with higher risk of any stroke (RR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-1.99). By stroke type, warfarin was not significantly linked to risk of ischemic stroke (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.57, P = 0.97), but was related to greater hemorrhagic stroke risk (RR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.62-3.27). Warfarin heightened overall bleeding risk (RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), but not death (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37-1.21).Among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing hemodialysis, use of warfarin is associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke, but did not increase overall mortality.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Renal Dialysis , Stroke/prevention & control , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Humans , Models, Statistical , Risk Factors , Stroke/chemically induced , Stroke/etiology , Warfarin/adverse effects
9.
Langmuir ; 31(12): 3738-44, 2015 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25741888

ABSTRACT

Freestanding nanoparticle membranes over circular wells are prepared by utilizing surface engineering. The crucial step of this method is the hydrophobic treatment of the substrate surface, which causes the water droplet to be suspended over wells during drying. Consequently, the nanoparticle monolayer self-assembled at the surface of the water droplet would drape itself over wells instead of being dragged into wells and ruptured into patches after the evaporation of water. This scenario was confirmed by the results of control experiments with changes in the hydrophobicity of the surface and the depth of wells. Moreover, the NaCl crystallization experiment provides additional evidence for the dynamic process of drying. Freestanding nanoparticle membranes with different nanoparticle core sizes and different lengths of ligands have been successfully prepared using the same route. The Young's modulus of one typical kind of prepared freestanding nanoparticle membrane was measured with force microscopy.

10.
Biomicrofluidics ; 8(5): 052110, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25538803

ABSTRACT

An automated, disk-based, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system is presented in this work. Magnetic beads were used as the antibody carriers to improve the assay sensitivity and shorten the reaction time. The magnetic module integrated on the system is capable of controlling the magnetic beads to either move in the incubation stage or immobilize at a specific location during washing stage. This controlling mechanism utilizes a passive controlling approach so that it can be performed through disk spinning without the need of active control from external devices. The movement of the magnetic beads was investigated and the optimal rotational speed was found to be related to the ratio of the processing time to the cycle time of the magnetic beads. Comparing to ELISA conducted on microtiter plates, similar test results could be achieved by the disk-based ELISA but the entire protocol can be finished automatically within 45 min with much less reagent consumption.

11.
J Antibiot (Tokyo) ; 63(7): 343-50, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20448668

ABSTRACT

A novel series of 4''-carbamates of 6,11-di-O-methylerythromycin A were synthesized and evaluated. These compounds have significant antibacterial activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including erythromycin-resistant but methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, erythromycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Gram-negative pathogens, such as Haemophilus influenzae To our surprise, most of the derivatives tested had potent activity against most resistant bacteria. Among these, compounds 10u, 10v, 10w and 10y were found to have potent activity against most susceptible and resistant bacteria. In particular, compound 10y exhibited excellent antibacterial activity in comparison to others.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemical synthesis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Erythromycin/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Erythromycin/chemical synthesis , Erythromycin/chemistry , Erythromycin/pharmacology , Haemophilus influenzae/drug effects , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Structure , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...