ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is one of the minimally invasive options for choledocholithiasis. Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) upon completion of laparoscopic choledochotomy is safe in selected patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of primary closure of CBD after LCBDE in patients aged 70 years or older. METHODS: A total of 116 patients (51 males and 65 females) who suffered from choledocholithiasis and underwent primary closure of the CBD (without T-tube drainage) after LCBDE from January 2003 to December 2017 were recruited. They were classified into two groups according to age: group A (≥70 years, nâ¯=â¯56), and group B (<70 years, nâ¯=â¯60). The preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 172.02 min for group A and 169.92 min for group B (Pâ¯=â¯0.853). The mean hospital stay was 7.40 days for group A and 5.38 days for group B (P < 0.001). Bile leakage occurred in two patients in group A and one in group B (3.57% vs 1.67%, Pâ¯=â¯0.952). There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications and mortality between the two groups. At median follow-up time of 60 months, stone recurrence was detected in one patient in group A and two in group B (1.79% vs 3.33%, Pâ¯=â¯1.000). Stenosis of CBD was not observed in group A and slight stenosis in one patient in group B (0â¯vs 1.67%, Pâ¯=â¯1.000). CONCLUSION: Primary closure of the CBD upon completion of laparoscopic choledochotomy is safe and feasible in elderly patients ≥70 years old.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Common Bile Duct/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/mortality , Choledocholithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Choledocholithiasis/mortality , Common Bile Duct/diagnostic imaging , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: To summarize the clinical experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy at a single center. METHODS: Between November 2003 and March 2009, 78 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 39), metastatic liver carcinoma (n = 10), and benign liver neoplasms (n = 29) underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy in our unit. A retrospective analysis was done on the clinical outcomes of the 78 patients. RESULTS: The lesions were located in segments I (n = 3), II (n = 16), III (n = 24), IV (n = 11), V (n = 11), VI (n = 9), and VIII (n = 4). The lesion sizes ranged from 0.8 to 15 cm. The number of lesions was three (n = 4), two (n = 8) and one (n = 66) in the study cohort. The surgical procedures included left hemi-hepatectomy (n = 7), left lateral lobectomy (n = 14), segmentectomy (n = 11), local resection (n = 39), and resection of metastatic liver lesions during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer (n = 7). Laparoscopic liver resection was successful in all patients, with no conversion to open procedures. Only four patients received blood transfusion (400-800 mL). There were no perioperative complications, such as bleeding and biliary leakage. The liver function of all patients recovered within 1 wk, and no liver failure occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible operation with minimal surgical trauma. It should be performed by a surgeon with sufficient experience in open hepatic resection and who is proficient in laparoscopy.
