ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease-associated antisynthetase syndrome (AS-ILD) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs are the mainstay of treatment. Human immunoglobulin (IVIg), an immunomodulator without immunosuppressive properties, is effective in myositis but the evidence supporting its use in ILD is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical outcomes of AS-ILD patients receiving IVIg. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of AS-ILD patients. Linear mixed models using restricted maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate the change in lung function and corticosteroid dose over time. RESULTS: Data from 17 patients was analyzed. Median follow-up was 24.6 months. Fourteen patients had refractory disease. The mean percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) (pâ¯=â¯0.048) and percent-predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%) (pâ¯=â¯0.0223) increased over time, while the mean prednisone dose (pâ¯<â¯0.001) decreased over time. Seven patients achieved a >10% increase in FVC%, including two who used IVIg as initial treatment. Five patients showed a >10% increase in DLCO% and TLC%. Nine (53%) patients experienced side effects. CONCLUSIONS: IVIg may be a useful complementary therapy in active progressive AS-ILD but is associated with potential side effects. Fssssurther investigation is required to determine the value of IVIg as an initial treatment in AS-ILD.
Subject(s)
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Myositis/therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Carbon Monoxide/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lung/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Myositis/complications , Myositis/mortality , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity/drug effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vital Capacity/drug effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of manual MGIT™ (MMGIT) compared to the gold standard, Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ), in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a high-burden setting. METHODS: Individuals with suspected TB enrolled in parallel diagnostic trials during 2007-2011 were included. Two samples were obtained from each patient and inoculated into MMGIT and LJ medium. Diagnostic tests were performed, and the incremental yield of a second test and time to detection (TTD) were calculated. Analyses were performed per patient and per sample. Gold standard was based on LJ culture. RESULTS: In the per patient and per sample analysis, we evaluated 1436 patients and 4142 samples. The sensitivity and specificity for smear and MMGIT per sample were respectively 89.9%/92.2% and 97.1%/98.9%. Contamination was observed in 1.4% of samples on MMGIT. The mean TTD (days) was 11.8 for MMGIT and 22.9 for LJ. The sensitivity and specificity for smear and MMGIT per patient were respectively 89.9% and 92.2% and 97.1% and 98.3%. A second MMGIT culture had an incremental yield of 1.6%. CONCLUSIONS: MMGIT has high sensitivity and specificity, regardless of smear result, with a 50% reduction in TTD compared to LJ. These features make MMGIT an acceptable TB diagnostic method for use in resource-limited settings.
