Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 2378, 2024 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493148

ABSTRACT

RNA ligases of the RTCB-type play an essential role in tRNA splicing, the unfolded protein response and RNA repair. RTCB is the catalytic subunit of the pentameric human tRNA ligase complex. RNA ligation by the tRNA ligase complex requires GTP-dependent activation of RTCB. This active site guanylylation reaction relies on the activation factor Archease. The mechanistic interplay between both proteins has remained unknown. Here, we report a biochemical and structural analysis of the human RTCB-Archease complex in the pre- and post-activation state. Archease reaches into the active site of RTCB and promotes the formation of a covalent RTCB-GMP intermediate through coordination of GTP and metal ions. During the activation reaction, Archease prevents futile RNA substrate binding to RTCB. Moreover, monomer structures of Archease and RTCB reveal additional states within the RNA ligation mechanism. Taken together, we present structural snapshots along the reaction cycle of the human tRNA ligase.


Subject(s)
Proteins , RNA Ligase (ATP) , Humans , Guanosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Proteins/metabolism , RNA/metabolism , RNA Ligase (ATP)/genetics , RNA Splicing , RNA, Transfer/genetics , RNA, Transfer/metabolism
2.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 46(11): 5792-5808, 2018 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29554310

ABSTRACT

Initially identified as a factor involved in tyrosine kinase receptor signaling, Grb10-interacting GYF protein 2 (GIGYF2) has later been shown to interact with the 5' cap-binding protein 4EHP as part of a translation repression complex, and to mediate post-transcriptional repression of tethered reporter mRNAs. A current model proposes that GIGYF2 is indirectly recruited to mRNAs by specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) leading to translation repression through its association with 4EHP. Accordingly, we recently observed that GIGYF2 also interacts with the miRNA-induced silencing complex and probably modulates its translation repression activity. Here we have further investigated how GIGYF2 represses mRNA function. In a tethering reporter assay, we identify three independent domains of GIGYF2 with repressive activity. In this assay, GIGYF2-mediated repression is independent of 4EHP but largely dependent on the CCR4/NOT complex that GIGYF2 recruits through multiple interfaces. Importantly, we show that GIGYF2 is an RBP and identify for the first time endogenous mRNA targets that recapitulate 4EHP-independent repression. Altogether, we propose that GIGYF2 has two distinct mechanisms of repression: one depends on 4EHP binding and mainly affects translation; the other is 4EHP-independent and involves the CCR4/NOT complex and its deadenylation activity.


Subject(s)
Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Protein Biosynthesis , RNA Stability , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Carrier Proteins/chemistry , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E , HeLa Cells , Humans , Protein Domains , RNA Cap-Binding Proteins/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , Ribonucleases/metabolism
3.
Oncogene ; 24(10): 1663-72, 2005 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15688024

ABSTRACT

Nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) entails two principal mechanisms: modification of DNA ends prior to ligation (error-prone rejoining) or precise ligation without modification if the DNA ends are complementary (error-free repair). Error-prone rejoining is mutagenic, because it can lead to destruction of coding sequence or to chromosomal aberrations, and therefore must be tightly regulated. Previous studies on the role of the p53 tumor suppressor in the regulation of NHEJ have yielded conflicting results, but a rigorous analysis of NHEJ proficiency and fidelity in a purely chromosomal context has not been carried out. To this end, we created novel repair plasmid substrates that integrate into the genome. DSBs generated by the I-SceI endonuclease within these substrates were repaired by either error-prone rejoining or precise ligation. We found that the expression of wild-type p53 inhibited any repair-associated DNA sequence deletion, including a more than 250-fold inhibition of error-prone rejoining events compared to p53-null cells, while any promoting effect of p53 on precise ligation could not be directly evaluated. The role of p53 in NHEJ appeared to involve a direct transactivation-independent mechanism, possibly restricting DNA end-modification by blocking the annealing of single strands along flanking stretches of microhomology. The inhibition of error-prone rejoining by p53 did not apply to the rejoining of DSBs induced by ionizing radiation. In conclusion, our data suggest that p53 restricts the mutagenic effects of NHEJ without compromising repair proficiency or cell survival, thereby maintaining genomic stability.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , DNA/radiation effects , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/physiology , Animals , Base Sequence , Cells, Cultured , DNA Repair , Mice , Molecular Sequence Data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...