Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gut ; 32(11): 1280-5, 1991 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1752455

ABSTRACT

Altogether, 138 patients were included in a study aimed at evaluating the effect of cisapride on healing and relapse of oesophagitis shown endoscopically. In the first phase of the study cisapride was given in an open fashion at 10 mg four times a day for 8 to 16 weeks, and healing was obtained in 69% of patients. Healing occurred later in patients with grades II to IV oesophagitis. The total score for reflux symptoms decreased by 67%. Eighty of the healed patients were included in the second phase. They were randomly assigned to double blind treatment with either cisapride 10 mg (n = 37) or placebo (n = 43) twice a day. Control endoscopy was performed when symptoms recurred or at the end of the six month trial. The cumulative percentage of patients in remission was higher (p = 0.06, survival analysis) in the cisapride group than in the placebo group, the relapse rates being 20% and 39%. The duration of remission tended to be longer in patients with a lower initial degree of oesophagitis. Adverse effects were no more frequent with cisapride than with placebo. In conclusion, cisapride is efficacious in healing oesophagitis, and, unlike other gastrointestinal prokinetic drugs or low dose cimetidine (400-800 mg daily) or ranitidine (150 mg daily), it may prevent relapse of oesophagitis.


Subject(s)
Esophagitis, Peptic/drug therapy , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cisapride , Double-Blind Method , Esophagitis, Peptic/pathology , Esophagitis, Peptic/prevention & control , Esophagus/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Piperidines/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Remission Induction
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 84(6): 674-6, 1989 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2658554

ABSTRACT

We describe an 84-yr-old woman in whom a straight Amsterdam-type biliary endoprosthesis was inserted because of endoscopically unremovable large common duct stones. After 18 months, the prosthesis migrated through the duodenum and the intrapancreatic portion of the bile duct, with its distal tip close to the vena cava and the aorta. In view of this high-risk complication, the authors avoid placing straight biliary endoprotheses for common bile duct stones in patients who might be lost to follow-up.


Subject(s)
Common Bile Duct , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology , Intubation/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Female , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...