[Experiences with telepathology in northern Afghanistan : A 10-year success story]. / Erfahrungen mit Telepathologie in Nordafghanistan : Eine 10-jährige Erfolgsgeschichte.

Afghanistan is in a military conflict lasting more than 20 years and according to recent political development, in a downhill spiral towards a failed society. This scenario faces the question of the usefulness of international medical aid, especially morphological diagnostics in crisis situations. On the basis of ten years of experience from a telemedicine project, need, feasibility and results in Afghanistan will be discussed. General and country-specific problems and the sustainability of an international partnership are discussed. In summary our experience is: (1) Telemedicine is possible and necessary even in countries with high conflict potential. It is integrated into routine care by local medical care taker, (2) Accompanying video conferences are a significant improvement in telemedical diagnostics, (3) "High level" consultations can bridge the gap between sophisticated western diagnostics and medicine in the partner country in selected cases and (4) Scientific work is possible on the basis of the medical data collected on site and the image material generated.

Experience with telepathology in combination with diagnostic assistance systems in countries with restricted resources.

INTRODUCTION: We describe the use of telepathology in countries with restricted resources using two diagnosis assistance systems (Isabel and Memem7) in addition to the diagnoses made by experts in pathology via the iPath-Network. METHODS: A total of 156 cases, largely from Afghanistan, were analysed; 18 cases had to be excluded because of poor image quality. RESULTS: Of the remaining 138 cases (100%), a responsible physician provided a tentative diagnosis for 61.6% of them. With a diagnosis from a consultant pathologist, it was then possible to make a definite diagnosis in 84.8% of cases on the basis of images taken from hematoxylin and eosin staining sections alone. The use of the diagnosis assistance systems resulted in an ordered list of differential diagnoses in 82.6% (IsabelHealth) and in 74.6% (Memem7) of cases, respectively. Adding morphological terminology reduced the list of possible diagnoses to 52.2% (72 cases, Memem7), but improved their quality. DISCUSSION: In summary, diagnosis assistance systems are promising approaches to provide physicians in countries with restricted resources with lists of probable differential diagnoses, thus increasing the plausibility of the diagnosis of the consultant pathologist.