ABSTRACT
Extensive epigenetic reprogramming occurs during mammalian gametogenesis and preimplantation development. DNA methylation patterns that are laid down during these stages are essential for subsequent normal foetal development. The requirement for more precise assessment of the epigenetic programming of in vitro-derived human preimplantation embryo has become of paramount importance following the identification of epigenetic diseases that are associated with assisted reproduction and/or infertility. Such techniques are also useful and applicable to experimental reproductive biology. In order to expand our knowledge of epigenetic marks, including DNA methylation, during mammalian reproduction and early development, it is necessary to test new and sufficiently sensitive protocols. There are, however, unique challenges to obtain DNA methylation data from the small cell numbers that are present in the preimplantation embryo. In this protocol, we describe the successful application of Pyrosequencing(®) to yield quantitative DNA methylation data over several CpG sites at differentially methylated regions (DMRs) at imprinted loci in single blastocysts, in this case, human blastocysts. Future developments of the protocol will allow DNA methylation analysis of a more extensive panel of genes for each embryo and at the same time, since the protocol allows for the extraction of mRNA from the embryo, the comparison between DNA methylation and gene expression.
Subject(s)
Blastocyst/metabolism , DNA Methylation , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Adult , DNA/genetics , DNA/isolation & purification , Genomics , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sulfites/pharmacologyABSTRACT
We report the first quantitative assessment of DNA methylation for any gene in the human preimplantation embryo to reveal that imprints exist at KvDMR1, RB1, SNRPN, and GRB10 in the human blastocyst. For comparison, in two human embryonic stem cell lines, imprints were also observed at KvDMR1, SNRPN, GRB10, and other imprinted loci, whereas RB1 and MEG3 were hypermethylated.
Subject(s)
Blastocyst/physiology , DNA Methylation , Embryonic Stem Cells/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genomic Imprinting , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Cell Line , Embryo Culture Techniques , GRB10 Adaptor Protein/genetics , Humans , Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated/genetics , Proteins/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding , Retinoblastoma Protein/genetics , snRNP Core Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Genes subject to genomic imprinting are mono-allelically expressed in a parent-of-origin dependent manner. Each imprinted locus has at least one differentially methylated region (DMR) which has allele specific DNA methylation and contributes to imprinted gene expression. Once DMRs are established, they are potentially able to withstand normal genome reprogramming events that occur during cell differentiation and germ-line DMRs are stably maintained throughout development. These DMRs, in addition to being either maternally or paternally methylated, have differences in whether methylation was acquired in the germ-line or post fertilization and are present in a variety of genomic locations with different Cytosine-phosphate guanine (CpG) densities and CTCF binding capacities. We therefore examined the stability of maintenance of DNA methylation imprints and determined the normal baseline DNA methylation levels in several adult tissues for all imprinted genes. In order to do this, we first developed and validated 50 highly specific, quantitative DNA methylation pyrosequencing assays for the known DMRs associated with human imprinted genes. RESULTS: Remarkable stability of the DNA methylation imprint was observed in all germ-line DMRs and paternally methylated somatic DMRs (which maintained average methylation levels of between 35% - 65% in all somatic tissues, independent of gene expression). Maternally methylated somatic DMRs were found to have more variation with tissue specific methylation patterns. Most DMRs, however, showed some intra-individual variability for DNA methylation levels in peripheral blood, suggesting that more than one DMR needs to be examined in order to get an overall impression of the epigenetic stability in a tissue. The plasticity of DNA methylation at imprinted genes was examined in a panel of normal and cancer cell lines. All cell lines showed changes in DNA methylation, especially at the paternal germ-line and the somatic DMRs. CONCLUSIONS: Our validated pyrosequencing methylation assays can be widely used as a tool to investigate DNA methylation levels of imprinted genes in clinical samples. This first comprehensive analysis of normal methylation levels in adult somatic tissues at human imprinted regions confirm that, despite intra-individual variability and tissue specific expression, imprinted genes faithfully maintain their DNA methylation in healthy adult tissue. DNA methylation levels of a selection of imprinted genes are, therefore, a valuable indicator for epigenetic stability.
