Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(3): 256-263, 2018 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to evaluate the place of new treatments in the management of endometriosis outside the context of infertility. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted by consulting Medline data until July 2017. RESULTS: Dienogest is effective compared to placebo in short term (NP2) and long term (NP4) for the treatment of painful endometriosis. In comparison with GnRH agonists, dienogest is also effective in terms of decreased pain and improved quality of life in non-operated patients (NP2) as well as for recurrence of lesions and symptomatology postoperatively (NP2). Data on GnRH antagonists, selective progesterone receptor modulators as well as selective inhibitors (anti-TNF-α, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors, angiogenesis growth factor inhibitors) are insufficient to provide evidence of interest in clinical practice for the management of painful endometriosis (NP3). CONCLUSION: Dienogest is recommended as second-line therapy for the management of painful endometriosis (Grade B). Because of lack of evidence, aromatase inhibitors, elagolix, SERM, SPRM and anti-TNF-α are not recommended for the management of painful endometriosis (Grade C).


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/drug therapy , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Contraceptives, Oral/therapeutic use , Dyspareunia/drug therapy , Dyspareunia/etiology , Endometriosis/complications , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Nandrolone/analogs & derivatives , Nandrolone/therapeutic use , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use
2.
CMAJ ; 161(5): 519-23, 1999 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10497607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines, such as those of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, although based on sound evidence, may conflict with the perceived needs and expectations of patients and physicians. This may jeopardize the implementation of such guidelines. This study was undertaken to explore patients' and family physicians' acceptance of the task force's recommendations and the values and criteria upon which the opinions of these 2 groups are based. METHODS: Focus groups were used to collect study data. In total, 35 physicians (in 7 groups) and 75 patient representatives (in 9 groups) participated in the focus groups. An inductive approach was used to develop coding grids and to generate themes from the transcripts of the interviews. RESULTS: Physicians expressed resistance to discontinuing the annual check-up, which they viewed as an organizational strategy to counteract the many barriers to preventive care that they encounter. They reported difficulties in explaining to their patients the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, which they found complex and inconsistent with popular wisdom. Both patients and physicians attributed high value to the detection of insidious diseases, even in the absence of proof of the effectiveness of such activity. INTERPRETATION: The patients and family physicians who participated in this study shared many opinions on the value of preventive activities that depart from the values used by "prevention experts" such as the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care in establishing their recommendations. A better understanding of the values of patients and physicians would help guideline developers to create better targeted communication strategies to take these discrepancies into account.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preventive Medicine , Public Opinion , Adult , Aged , Canada , Family Practice , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged
3.
J Pharm Sci ; 86(2): 172-8, 1997 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9040091

ABSTRACT

A sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay for a novel luteinizing-hormone-releasing-hormone (LHRH) agonist, [2-Me-D-Trp6, DesGly10]LHRH ethylamide (meterelin), was developed for documenting the pharmacokinetic parameters of this peptide following its intravenous (iv) and subcutaneous (sc) administration in dogs. The assay was also used for monitoring meterelin in plasma following its release from d,l-lactide-glycolide implants in the same species. Rabbit antisera generated against [DespyroGlu1] meterelin and conjugated to bovine serum albumin with glutaraldehyde showed high specificity, whereas crossreactivity to LHRH and its fragments and to analogs with substitutions at residues 6 and 10 was found insignificant. The assay was validated in terms of accuracy (recovery range, 94.0-105.4%), in terms of precision (intra- and interassay variations of 10.0-12.4% and 8.6-11.3%, respectively), and in terms of sensitivity (minimum detectable dose of 2.7 pg/assay). Following iv acute administration, a biexponential decline of plasma meterelin levels was observed, with distribution and elimination half-lives of 5.9 +/- 2.5 and 106 +/- 22 min, respectively. After sc acute administration, the elimination half-life was in the range of 103 to 173 min. The systemic clearance (CLT) ranged from 1.6 to 2.6 mL/min/kg, and the volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) varied from 285 to 438 mL/kg. The elimination half-life (T1/2 beta), Vdss, and ClT were not significantly different after both routes of administration over the 1-100-microgram/kg dose range of peptide studied. Castrate levels of testosterone were attained 10 days after sc administration of the implant, lasted for up to 247 days, and were well correlated with plasma levels of meterelin.


Subject(s)
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Dogs , Drug Implants , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/administration & dosage , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/blood , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/immunology , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/pharmacokinetics , Immune Sera , Injections, Intravenous , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , Radioimmunoassay , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Testosterone/blood
4.
Can Med Assoc J ; 133(2): 108-10, 1985 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3873983

ABSTRACT

The results of a population-based survey of 170 children's vaccination records were used to calculate the cumulative distributions of the ages (in months) at which each dose of vaccine had been received. Considerable delays in the administration of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and of the fourth dose of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine were observed, particularly in children vaccinated by private physicians rather than at public health clinics. The delay before MMR vaccination causes concern because of the frequency of measles in children aged 1 to 2 years, particularly those attending day-care centres, and the fragility of the herd immunity against this disease. Physicians should follow up patients who have missed appointments for MMR vaccination if a voluntary measles control program is to succeed.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Age Factors , Child, Preschool , Diphtheria Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine , Drug Combinations/administration & dosage , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Infant , Male , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Medical Records , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Quebec , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Tetanus Toxoid/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...