Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Adv Ther ; 34(7): 1695-1706, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608143

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have examined outcomes and potential complications among glaucoma patients who are prescribed topical beta-blockers. This study examined resource usage (number of GP visits and hospitalizations) and diagnoses of respiratory or cardiovascular conditions among glaucoma patients prescribed beta-blockers compared to patients not prescribed beta-blockers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database over the period January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2014. Adult patients with at least one diagnosis of glaucoma were categorized into beta-blocker users and non-beta-blocker users. Beta-blocker users were further separated into patients that maintained beta-blocker therapy and patients that discontinued beta-blocker treatment in year 2 of the post-index period. The CPRD data was queried directly to obtain the number of GP visits, and hospitalizations were extracted by linking the CPRD and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) patient-level data. RESULTS: In the 12 months after being prescribed beta-blockers, patients that later discontinued beta-blocker treatment had a significantly higher average number of hospitalizations than patients that maintained beta-blocker therapy and the non-beta-blocker users (p < 0.05). In the year after beta-blocker initiation, there was a statistically significant within-group difference pre- and post-beta-blocker initiation for all groups, but the greatest number of GP visits occurred in the patients that subsequently discontinued beta-blocker treatment (mean 19.27). Patients that discontinued beta-blocker treatment were significantly more likely to have cardiovascular events than non-beta-blocker users in the post-index period (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the introduction of beta-blockers in a certain group of patients who later discontinue their use is associated with increased use of medical resources (higher number of GP visits and hospitalizations) in glaucoma patients in the UK, which may be indicative of a potential relationship between use of topical beta-blockers in glaucoma therapy and adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom
2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 22(5): 561-71, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27123917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a debilitating disease associated with high mortality and frequent hospitalizations. American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) guidelines recommend the following drug classes for HF treatment: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor II blocker (ARB) for patients intolerant to ACEI, beta blocker (BB), and aldosterone antagonist (AA). OBJECTIVE: To examine, in a real-word setting, the treatment initiation pattern among newly diagnosed HF patients in the United States, subsequent treatment modifications, hospitalizations and the impact of hospitalizations on therapy changes, and treatment adherence and persistence. METHODS: Using medical and pharmacy claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan database, this retrospective cohort study included adult patients with ≥ 2 medical claims corresponding to an HF diagnosis (ICD-9-CM codes 428.x, 402.11, 402.91, 404.01, 404.11, 404.91, 404.03, 404.13, and 404.93) between April 2009 and March 2012. The date of the first claim was defined as the index date. Patients with continuous medical and pharmacy eligibility for a minimum of 12 months pre- and post-index were included in the analysis. Patients with an HF diagnosis in the 12 months before the index date were excluded. Index treatment (within 30 days post-index), subsequent treatment modification (class addition/removal) during the study period, hospitalization, and change in treatment after hospitalization (within 15 days after hospital discharge) were determined. Adherence was evaluated using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method, and persistence was defined as the proportion of patients remaining on index treatment after a defined period of time (12 months). RESULTS: A total of 235,758 patients meeting the sample selection criteria were included in the analysis and were followed for a median of 28 months after the index date. Approximately 42% of patients were not prescribed any HF-specific treatment within 30 days post-index. Among those treated, prescriptions for ACEIs were filled by 46.42% of patients, ARBs by 17.07%, BBs by 75.62%, and AAs by 9.83%. Based on HF therapy class, monotherapy was prescribed to 51% of patients, bi-therapy to 40%, and triple therapy to 9%. More than 80% of patients experienced treatment modification during the median 28 months of follow-up. A total of 174,563 (74.0%) patients had at least 1 all-cause hospitalization (mean 1.11 [SD = 0.98]) per year, with a mean length of stay (LOS) of 7.19 [SD = 8.69] days. Within 12 months post-index, 85.7% of these patients experienced an all-cause hospitalization, with 29.6% having HF-related hospitalization (mean 0.18 [0.36]) and mean LOS of 5.85 [5.45] days. More than 60% of patients continued on the same therapy after all-cause or HF hospitalization. More patients on multiple therapies remained on the same treatment (73%-89%) compared with those treated with monotherapy (60%-73%) after the first HF hospitalization. Among patients untreated before hospitalization, 9.8% and 17% received treatment after all-cause and HF hospitalization, respectively. During the entire study period (median 28 months), 29% of patients did not have a prescription fill for HF-specific treatments. The median PDC was > 0.65, and considering a gap of 30 days between ends of supply from 1 medication fill to the subsequent fill, persistence ranged from 41% (AA) to 52% (BB). CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this claims database analysis among 235,758 HF patients suggest that more than one third of newly diagnosed HF patients do not receive HF-specific medication within 30 days following initial diagnosis. Despite ACCF/AHA recommendations of initiating treatment with a combination of 2 HF drug classes, only 40% of patients had a prescription fill for bi-therapy. Hospitalization did not have a major impact on HF therapy prescribing patterns. To our knowledge, this is the first study to establish the impact of hospitalization on HF-specific treatment among newly diagnosed patients. Adherence and persistence were moderate across all HF therapies of interest. This analysis reveals the need for further research to better understand the reasons for the demonstrated delay in HF treatment initiation and limited use of guideline-directed medical therapy after initial diagnosis. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Deschaseaux, McSharry, Hudson, Agrawal, and Turner are permanent employees of Novartis. Concept and study design were contributed by Deschaseaux, Hudson, and Turner, along with McSharry. McSharry took the lead in data collection, along with Deschaseaux, Hudson, and Turner. Data interpretation was performed by Hudson, along with the other authors. The manuscript was written by Agrawal, along with Deschaseaux and Turner, and revised by Deschaseaux and Turner, along with the other authors.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Managed Care Programs , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 16(9): 1801-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22139047

ABSTRACT

This study investigates parents' ability to correctly classify their child's weight status. The influence of parent and child socio-demographic and lifestyle factors on parental misclassification of their child's weight status is explored. A representative sample of Irish children (aged 5-12 (n = 596) years, aged 13-17 years (n = 441)) and their parents (n = 1885) were recruited to participate in a national dietary survey. Parental perceptions of their child's weight and their own weight were measured. Anthropometric measurements (weight and height) were objectively measured for parents and children. Body Mass Index (BMI) scores were derived and categorised as normal, overweight or obese using standard references. Over 80% of parents of overweight boys and 79.3% of parents of overweight girls reported their child's weight was fine for his/her height and age. Furthermore, 44.4% of parents of obese boys and 45.3% of parents of obese girls felt their child's weight was fine for their height and age. Parents were significantly less likely to be correct about their sons' weight status and more likely to be correct the older the child. Parents were over 86% less likely to be correct about their child's weight if their child was overweight and approximately 59% less likely to be correct if the child was obese, compared to parents of normal weight children. This research suggests that parents are failing to recognise overweight and obesity in their children with factors such as parental weight status, child's age and gender influencing this.


Subject(s)
Body Weight , Obesity/prevention & control , Parents/psychology , Perception , Adolescent , Adult , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Surveys , Humans , Ireland , Life Style , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Rural Population , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population
4.
Proc Nutr Soc ; 68(2): 135-41, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19243666

ABSTRACT

A chronology of food scares combined with a rapid, unchecked, rise in lifestyle-related diseases such as obesity highlights the need for a focus on effective food risk communication. However, food risk communication is highly complex. Many factors will affect its success, including the demeanour and conduct of the source, its transparency, interaction with the public, acknowledgement of risks and timely disclosure. How the message is developed is also important in terms of language, style and pretesting with target audiences, as is the choice of appropriate channels for reaching target audiences. Finally, there are many personal factors that may affect risk perception such as previous experience, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, personality, psychological factors and socio-demographic factors, many of which remain unexplored. While there is evidence that campaigns that communicate health risk have been associated with behaviour change in relation to major public health and safety issues in the past, it is unknown at this stage whether targeting risk information based on risk-perception segmentation can increase the effectiveness of the messages.


Subject(s)
Communication , Food , Health Education , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Behavior Therapy , Demography , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diet , Environment , Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion , Humans , Mass Media , Obesity/epidemiology , Perception , Psychology , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...