ABSTRACT
The long-term goal of our research is to engineer an acellular nerve graft for clinical nerve repair and for use as a model system with which to study nerve-extracellular matrix interactions during nerve regeneration. To develop this model acellular nerve graft we (1) examined the effects of detergents on peripheral nerve tissue, and (2) used that knowledge to create a nerve graft devoid of cells with a well-preserved extracellular matrix. Using histochemistry and Western analysis, the impact of each detergent on cellular and extracellular tissue components was determined. An optimized protocol was created with the detergents Triton X-200, sulfobetaine-16, and sulfobetaine-10. This study represents the most comprehensive examination to date of the effects of detergents on peripheral nerve tissue morphology and protein composition. Also presented is an improved chemical decellularization protocol that preserves the internal structure of native nerve more than the predominant current protocol.
Subject(s)
Cell Fractionation/methods , Cell-Free System/chemistry , Detergents/pharmacology , Extracellular Matrix/chemistry , Sciatic Nerve/chemistry , Sciatic Nerve/drug effects , Tissue Engineering/methods , Transplants , Animals , Detergents/chemistry , Extracellular Matrix/ultrastructure , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sciatic Nerve/cytology , Tissue Engineering/instrumentationABSTRACT
To replace the autologous graft as a clinical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries we developed an optimized acellular (OA) nerve graft that retains the extracellular structure of peripheral nerve tissue via an improved chemical decellularization treatment. The process removes cellular membranes from tissue, thus eliminating the antigens responsible for allograft rejection. In the present study, the immunogenicity and regenerative capacity of the OA grafts were tested. Histological examination of the levels of CD(8+) cells and macrophages that infiltrated the OA grafts suggested that the decellularization process averted cell-mediated rejection of the grafts. In a subsequent experiment, regeneration in OA grafts was compared with that in isografts (comparable to the clinical autograft) and two published acellular graft models. After 84 days, the axon density at the midpoints of OA grafts was statistically indistinguishable from that in isografts, 910% higher than in the thermally decellularized model described by Gulati (J. Neurosurg. 68, 117, 1988), and 401% higher than in the chemically decellularized model described by Sondell et al. (Brain Res. 795, 44, 1998). In summary, the results imply that OA grafts are immunologically tolerated and that the removal of cellular material and preservation of the matrix are beneficial for promoting regeneration through an acellular nerve graft.
