Intraoperative aberrometry-based aphakia refraction in patients with cataract: status and options.

AIM: To explore the application of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry (IWA) for aphakia-based biometry using three existing formulae derived from autorefractive retinoscopy and introducing new improved formulae. METHODS: In 74 patients undergoing cataract surgery, three repeated measurements of aphakic spherical equivalent (SE) were taken. All measurements were objectively graded for their quality and evaluated with the 'limits of agreement' approach. ORs were calculated and analysis of variance was applied. The intraocular lens (IOL) power that would have given the target refraction was back-calculated from manifest refraction at 3 months postoperatively. Regression analysis was performed to generate two aphakic SE-based formulae for predicting this IOL. The accuracy of the formulae was determined by comparing them to conventional biometry and published aphakia formulae. RESULTS: In 32 eyes, three consecutive aphakic measurements were successful. Objective parameters of IWA map quality significantly impacted measurement variability (p<0.05). The limits of agreement of repeated aphakic SE readings were +0.66 dioptre (D) and -0.69 D. Intraoperative biometry by our formula resulted in 25% and 53% of all cases ±0.50D and ±1.00 D within SE target, respectively. A second formula that took axial length (AL) into account resulted in improved ratios of 41% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable application of IWA to calculate IOL power during routine cataract surgery may not be feasible given the high rate of measurement failures and the large variations of the readings. To enable reliable IOL calculation from IWA, measurement precision must be improved and aphakic IOL formulae need to be fine-tuned.

First clinicial results on the feasibility, quality and reproducibility of aberrometry-based intraoperative refraction during cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To provide the first clinical data in determining the feasibility, quality and precision of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry (IWA)-based refraction in patients with cataract. DESIGN: IWA refraction was recorded at 7 defined measurement points during standardised cataract surgery in 74 eyes of 74 consecutive patients (mean age 69±11.3 years). Precision and measurement quality was evaluated by the 'limits of agreement' approach, regression analysis, correlation analysis, Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and ORs for predicting measurement failure. Wavefront map (WFM) quality was objectivised and compared with the Pentacam Nuclear Staging analysis. RESULTS: Out of 814 IWA measurement attempts, 462 WFMs could be obtained. The most successful readings (n=63) were achieved in aphakia with viscoelastic. The highest (50.63%, SD 20.23) and lowest (29.19%, SD 13.94) quality of WFMs across all measurement points were found after clear corneal incision and in pseudophakia with viscoelastic, respectively. High consistency across repeated measures were found for mean spherical equivalent (SE) differences in aphakia with -0.01D and pseudophakia with -0.01D, but ranges were high (limits of agreement +0.69 D and -0.72 D; +1.53 D and -1.54 D, respectively). With increasing WFM quality, higher precision in measurements was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report addressing quality and reproducibility of WA in a large sample. IWA refraction in aphakia, for instance, appears to be reliable once stable and pressurised anterior chamber conditions are achieved. More efforts are required to improve the precision and quality of measurements before IWA can be used to guide the surgical refractive plan in cataract surgery.

Unsupervised learning of facial emotion decoding skills.

Research on the mechanisms underlying human facial emotion recognition has long focussed on genetically determined neural algorithms and often neglected the question of how these algorithms might be tuned by social learning. Here we show that facial emotion decoding skills can be significantly and sustainably improved by practice without an external teaching signal. Participants saw video clips of dynamic facial expressions of five different women and were asked to decide which of four possible emotions (anger, disgust, fear, and sadness) was shown in each clip. Although no external information about the correctness of the participant's response or the sender's true affective state was provided, participants showed a significant increase of facial emotion recognition accuracy both within and across two training sessions two days to several weeks apart. We discuss several similarities and differences between the unsupervised improvement of facial decoding skills observed in the current study, unsupervised perceptual learning of simple stimuli described in previous studies and practice effects often observed in cognitive tasks.

Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate accuracy of WASCA wavefront aberrometry (WA) refraction in comparison to manifest refraction (MR) in an older population awaiting cataract surgery. METHODS: Prospectively, refractive errors of 130 eyes were determined by WA and MR. Mean age was 65.9 (SD 11.81), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) averaged 0.20 logMar (SD 0.57), mean manifest sphere was 0.23 dioptres (D, SD 3.39) and manifest astigmatism amounted to -1.25 D (SD 1.21). For further analysis, refractive values were transformed into power vector components: spherical equivalent (SE), Jackson cross cylinder at 0° and 45° (J0 and J45). The 'limits of agreement' approach, regression analysis, correlation analysis, and ANOVA were applied and additionally compared to 28 healthy eyes (mean VA -0.1 logMAR) of a group of young subjects (mean age 33.9). RESULTS: SE measures in myopia correlated highly between WA and MR (r = 0.917, p < .001). In hyperopia this correlation was moderately high (r = 0.800, p < .001). For all subjects, correlations between WA and MR for J0 and J45 were r = 0.742 (p < .001) and r = 0.760 (p < .001) respectively. WA measurements revealed larger agreement ranges with increasing myopia and astigmatism. Controlled for possible confounding variables of age, VA, and refractive state, no statistically significant effects were found. Across nearly all conditions, WA measured significantly higher myopic and astigmatic values than MR. Most effects were replicated in the reference group. CONCLUSIONS: WA refraction can provide valuable information in previously under-researched conditions such as reduced VA (cataract-related), advanced age, and hyperopia. However, loss of optical media transparency will inherently reduce accuracy of WA. Further studies are needed to define cut-off values for automated wavefront quality grading and intra-operative application of WA in refractive surgery.