Dose matters! Optimisation of guideline adherence is associated with lower mortality in stable patients with chronic heart failure.

AIMS: Guidelines have been published for improving management of chronic heart failure (CHF). We examined the association between improved guideline adherence and risk for all-cause death in patients with stable systolic HF. METHODS: Data on ambulatory patients (2006-2010) with CHF and reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) from the Austrian Heart Failure Registry (HIR Austria) were analysed. One-year clinical data and long-term follow-up data until all-cause death or data censoring were available for 1014 patients (age 65 [55-73], male 75%, NYHA class I 14%, NYHA II 56%, NYHA III/IV 30%). A guideline adherence indicator (GAI [0-100%]) was calculated for each patient at baseline and after 12 ± 3 months that considered indications and contraindications for ACE-I/ARB, beta blockers, and MRA. Patients were considered ΔGAI-positive if GAI improved to or remained at high levels (≥ 80%). ΔGAI50+ positivity was ascribed to patients achieving a dose of ≥ 50% of suggested target dose. RESULTS: Improvements in GAI and GAI50+ were associated with significant improvements in NYHA class and NT-proBNP (1728 [740-3636] to 970 [405-2348]) (p<0.001). Improvements in GAI50+, but not GAI, were independently predictive of lower mortality risk (HR 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0.87; p=0.01]) after adjustment for a large variety of baseline parameters and hospitalisation for heart failure during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in guideline adherence with particular emphasis on dose escalation is associated with a decrease in long-term mortality in ambulatory HF-REF subjects surviving one year after registration.

Neurohormonal risk stratification for sudden death and death owing to progressive heart failure in chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: This study tested various neurohormones for prediction of heart failure death (death owing to progressive deterioration of ventricular function; HFD). Moreover, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a predictor of sudden death (SD; as reported previously) and the best predictor of HFD were combined for a simple risk stratification model. DESIGN: BNP, the N-terminal fragment of BNP (N-BNP), and of the atrial natriuretic peptide (N-ANP) and big endothelin levels were obtained from 452 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction 130 pg mL(-1) and N-ANP < 6300 fmol mL(-1) (Group B, n = 177; 18%; P = 0.0001) and patients with BNP > 130 pg mL(-1) and N-ANP > 6300 fmol mL(-1) (Group C, n = 50; 19%; P = 0.0001). Analyzing 293 survivors and 31 patients with HFD, fewer patients died in Group A (n = 109; 0%; P = 0.0001) and Group B (n = 153; 6%; P = 0.0001) as compared with patients of Group C (n = 62; 34%). CONCLUSION: Prognostic power of neurohormones depends on the mode of death. The combined determination of BNP and N-ANP identifies patients with minimal risk of death, elevated SD but low HFD risk as well as elevated SD and HFD risk.

Natriuretic peptides and the prevalence of congestive heart failure in patients with pacemakers.

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of natriuretic cardiac peptide measurement in the context of left ventricular dysfunction and comorbidities in a pacemaker population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients with pacemakers were included in the study. All patients underwent echocardiography and were asked to complete the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (N-ANP) and atrial natriuretic peptide levels in plasma were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of patients had reduced systolic left ventricular function; only 16 patients had a history of congestive heart failure. BNP was abnormally elevated in 64%, N-BNP in 72% and N-ANP in 96% of patients. Both BNP (r = 0.30; P < 0.01) and N-ANP (r = 0.39; P < 0.0005) correlated with MLHFQ. The strongest correlation was found between N-ANP and the ejection fraction (r = 0.6; P < 0.0001). Patients were stratified in a high-risk group and a low risk-group according to their N-ANP (N-ANP > 5000 fmol L(-1); n = 63 and N-ANP < 5000 fmol L(-1), n = 32) and BNP levels (BNP > 400 pg mL(-1); n = 17 and BNP < 400 pg mL(-1), n = 78). N-ANP was correlated with hypertension (P < 0.003) and atrial fibrillation (P < 0.03), and BNP with mitral insufficiency (P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac natriuretic peptides are markedly elevated in the majority of patients with pacemakers. The prognostic significance of BNP and N-ANP in left ventricular dysfunction warrants close follow-up schedules.

Hemodynamic effects of a continuous infusion of levosimendan in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock requiring catecholamines.

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan, a novel inodilator, has been shown to improve hemodynamic function in patients with decompensated heart failure with preserved arterial blood pressure. Data on its use in patients with cardiogenic shock are rare. The present series describes the 24-h hemodynamic effects of levosimendan as add-on therapy in desperately ill patients with cardiogenic shock requiring catecholamines. METHODS: Ten patients with cardiogenic shock received levosimendan as continuous infusion of 0.1 microg kg(-1) min(-1) for 24 h. The patients were otherwise unselected. Hemodynamic measurements were routinely performed at baseline (time 0) and at 1, 8, 16 and 24 h after start of levosimendan (LS) using a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter. RESULTS: During the levosimendan infusion there was a significant increase in cardiac index from 1.8 +/- 0.4 to 2.4 +/- 0.6 L*min-1*m-2 (P = 0.023) and a significant decrease in systemic vascular resistance from 1559 +/- 430 to 1109 +/- 202 dyn*s*cm-5 (P = 0.001), respectively. Changes in catecholamine dose, and in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were not significant. Given the individual response to LS, 8/10 patients showed an increase in left ventricular stroke work index under reduced or roughly unchanged preload conditions after 8 h. CONCLUSION: This series shows that a LS infusion is feasible and able to improve hemodynamics in severely compromized, critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock requiring catecholamine therapy. Its potential advantages when compared with other inotropes are unclear. To clarify the potential role of LS in this clinical setting randomized controlled trials on hemodynamic and mortality endpoints are needed.

Neuromuscular electric stimulation in heart transplantation candidates with cardiac pacemakers.

Twenty percent of heart transplantation candidates have cardiac pacemakers. Application of neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) in patients with pacemakers is controversial because of potential electromagnetic field interference and subsequent failure of the pacemaker. We present a safety protocol as a procedure before applying NMES in pacemaker patients. In 4 patients with chronic heart failure, NMES was applied under supervised conditions for 20 minutes to evaluate the individual risk. No changes in the clinical state and no complications secondary to electromagnetic field interference were observed. A check of pacemaker function after this 20-minute stimulation revealed no changes in the pacemaker parameters. After a thorough safety protocol, NMES of knee extensor muscles in patients with pacemakers appears to be safe.

Atrial natriuretic peptide release is more dependent on atrial filling volume than on filling pressure in chronic congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) release has been difficult to demonstrate in patient studies because of inaccuracies in measuring atrial volumes using conventional techniques. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 28 clinically stable patients (New York Heart Association class 3) with chronic heart failure to determine right atrial (RA), left atrial (LA), and ventricular volumes. In addition, right heart catheterization was serially performed and plasma ANP levels (in picograms per milliliter) were drawn from the right atrium. RESULTS: Five patients had to be excluded from data analysis for technical reasons. The remaining 23 patients had the following hemodynamic measurements (mean +/- SD): RA mean pressure 7+/-5 mm Hg, pulmonary artery mean pressure 28+/-10, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 21+/-8 mm Hg, and cardiac index 2.9+/-1.4 (L/min/m2), respectively. Plasma ANP levels were significantly elevated at 162+/-117 (normal range 20 to 65 pg/ml, p < 0.05), as were LA and RA volumes compared with healthy controls (RA volume 128+/-64 ml vs 82+/-25 ml, p < 0.05; LA volume 157+/-54 ml vs 71+/-24 ml, p < 0.01, respectively). ANP showed a stronger relation with atrial volumes (RA volume, r = 0.91, p = 0.0001; LA volume, r = 0.80, p = 0.001) than with atrial pressures (RA mean pressure, r = 0.45, p = 0.03; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, r = 0.67, p = 0.001). A subgroup analysis of patients with increased RA or LA volumes (>1 SD of mean of controls) revealed a stronger relation between ANP and RA volumes than between ANP and LA volumes. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that increased right heart volume with subsequent increased atrial stretch is the major determinant for ANP release in patients with stable CHF.