European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association position paper on the role and safety of new glucose-lowering drugs in patients with heart failure.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Significant advances have recently occurred in the treatment of T2DM, with evidence of several new glucose-lowering medications showing either neutral or beneficial cardiovascular effects. However, some of these agents have safety characteristics with strong practical implications in HF [i.e. dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors]. Regarding safety of DPP-4 inhibitors, saxagliptin is not recommended in HF because of a greater risk of HF hospitalisation. There is no compelling evidence of excess HF risk with the other DPP-4 inhibitors. GLP-1 RAs have an overall neutral effect on HF outcomes. However, a signal of harm suggested in two small trials of liraglutide in patients with reduced ejection fraction indicates that their role remains to be defined in established HF. SGLT-2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, canagliflozin and dapagliflozin) have shown a consistent reduction in the risk of HF hospitalisation regardless of baseline cardiovascular risk or history of HF. Accordingly, SGLT-2 inhibitors could be recommended to prevent HF hospitalisation in patients with T2DM and established cardiovascular disease or with multiple risk factors. The recently completed trial with dapagliflozin has shown a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and HF events in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction, with or without T2DM. Several ongoing trials will assess whether the results observed with dapagliflozin could be extended to other SGLT-2 inhibitors in the treatment of HF, with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction, regardless of the presence of T2DM. This position paper aims to summarise relevant clinical trial evidence concerning the role and safety of new glucose-lowering therapies in patients with HF.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation impairs anti-oxidant high-density lipoprotein function in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The underlying reasons for the highly inconsistent clinical outcome data for omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3-PUFAs) supplementation in patients with cardiac disease have not been understood yet. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study was to determine the effects of oral treatment with n3-PUFAs on the anti-oxidant capacity of HDL in heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with advanced HF of nonischaemic origin, defined by NT-proBNP levels of >2000 pg/mL, NYHA class III or IV and a LVEF <35% who were on stable optimized medical therapy for ≥3 months, were consecutively enrolled into this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive 1 g/day or 4 g/day of n3-PUFA, or placebo, respectively, for 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the anti-oxidant function of HDL, measured by the HDL inflammatory index, was found significantly impaired in the treatment group in a dose-dependent fashion with 0.67 [IQR 0.49-1.04] for placebo vs 0.71 [IQR 0.55-1.01] for 1 g/day n3-PUFA vs 0.98 [IQR 0.73-1.16] for 4 g/day n3-PUFA (P for trend = 0.018). CONCLUSION: We provide evidence for an adverse effect of n3-PUFA supplementation on anti-oxidant function of HDL in nonischaemic heart failure patients, establishing a potential mechanistic link for the controversial outcome data on n3-PUFA supplementation.

Quality of medical therapy in heart failure patients undergoing elective revascularisation: A protective effect of disease modifying therapy at discharge.

The STICH(-ES) trial showed that coronary artery bypass grafting was superior to medical therapy alone in treating ischemic heart failure. However, dosages of disease modifying drugs were not reported. We included 128 (84% male, mean age 66 ± 11 years) consecutive patients with ischemic heart failure and an ejection fraction ≤35% undergoing isolated elective coronary artery bypass grafting. We defined optimal medical therapy (OMT) as prescription of ≥50% dosages of guideline recommended medications (i.e. beta-blocker (BB) and renin angiotensin system (RAS) antagonist) plus prescription of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 12.3 ± 13.8%. The five year survival was 74%. At discharge, 111 patients (87%) were on a BB and 106 (83%) were on a RAS antagonist. Forty-nine patients (38%) received an MRA. Only 8 patients (6%) received OMT. A Cox regression analysis revealed EuroSCORE (p < 0.001) and the use of MRA (p = 0.003) and BB (p = 0.037) at discharge as significant predictors of 5 year survival. Prescription rates of heart failure medication are comparable to those reported in the STICH trial, but rates of OMT are very low at admission and discharge. Prescription of BB and MRA was associated with improved survival, highlighting the need for disease management programs and rigorous discharge management.

PONTIAC (NT-proBNP selected prevention of cardiac events in a population of diabetic patients without a history of cardiac disease): a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the primary preventive effect of neurohumoral therapy in high-risk diabetic patients selected by N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). BACKGROUND: Few clinical trials have successfully demonstrated the prevention of cardiac events in patients with diabetes. One reason for this might be an inaccurate selection of patients. NT-proBNP has not been assessed in this context. METHODS: A total of 300 patients with type 2 diabetes, elevated NT-proBNP (>125 pg/ml) but free of cardiac disease were randomized. The "control" group was cared for at 4 diabetes care units; the "intensified" group was additionally treated at a cardiac outpatient clinic for the up-titration of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists and beta-blockers. The primary endpoint was hospitalization/death due to cardiac disease after 2 years. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age of the patients was 67.5 ± 9 years, duration of diabetes was 15 ± 12 years, 37% were male, HbA1c was 7 ± 1.1%, blood pressure was 151 ± 22 mm Hg, heart rate was 72 ± 11 beats/min, median NT-proBNP was 265.5 pg/ml (interquartile range: 180.8 to 401.8 pg/ml). After 12 months there was a significant difference between the number of patients treated with a RAS antagonist/beta-blocker and the dosage reached between groups (p < 0.0001). Blood pressure was significantly reduced in both (p < 0.05); heart rate was only reduced in the intensified group (p = 0.004). A significant reduction of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.351; 95% confidence interval: 0.127 to 0.975, p = 0.044) was visible in the intensified group. The same was true for other endpoints: all-cause hospitalization, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations/death (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated up-titration of RAS antagonists and beta-blockers to maximum tolerated dosages is an effective and safe intervention for the primary prevention of cardiac events for diabetic patients pre-selected using NT-proBNP. (Nt-proBNP Guided Primary Prevention of CV Events in Diabetic Patients [PONTIAC]; NCT00562952).

Portable recording for detecting sleep disorder breathing in patients under the care of a heart failure clinic.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) has important clinical implications in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). We performed portable recording in unselected CHF patients on contemporary therapy. Data on the interactions of SDB in patients supervised at heart failure clinics are rare and we illustrate diversities of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA). METHODS: We studied 176 consecutive subjects on contemporary medical therapy with a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 25.0 % (range 7-35%) and median NT-pro BNP levels of 3,413.0 pg/ml (range 305.1-35,000.0 pg/ml). Participants underwent prospective overnight portable recording. RESULTS: 50% presented with an at least moderate form of nocturnal breathing disorder [apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15/h]. Only 15 patients (17.1%) with AHI ≥15/h reported excessive daytime sleepiness. Irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, patients with CSA had higher levels of NT-pro BNP compared to patients with OSA (differences in medians = 2,639.0 pg/ml, p = 0.016), and compared to patients with an AHI <15/h (differences in medians = 2,710.0 pg/ml, p < 0.001). OSA affected 26 patients (14.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe stable CHF on contemporary therapy have a prevalence of 50.0% of moderate to severe SDB. The natural cascade of the failing heart is initially characterised by absent SDB or OSA, whereas end-stage CHF is associated with CSA.

Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on survival in patients with chronic heart failure: unexpected findings of a long-term observational study.

AIMS: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) but its prognostic impact is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 576 consecutive patients with CHF were prospectively included. The impact of moderate and severe (significant) TR on the combined endpoint death/heart transplantation/left ventricular-assist device implantation was assessed. Patients were followed for 5.8 ± 4.2 (maximum 14.4) years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a worse outcome of patients with significant TR (P < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, amino terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (P = 0.0028), systolic left ventricular function (LVF) (P = 0.0014), serum sodium, NYHA functional class, systolic blood pressure, right atrial size (all P = 0.0001), but not TR were significantly related with the outcome. However, as soon as the strong interaction between TR and LVF was included in the model, significant TR determined outcome as well (P = 0.0059). Therefore, in a second analysis patients were stratified for LVF. In patients with mildly or moderately impaired LVF, TR was significantly related with the outcome (HR: 1.368, CI: 1.070-1.748, P = 0.0125), whereas in patients with severely depressed LVF it was not (P = 0.1401). As a proof of concept, we additionally stratified patients according to serum NT-proBNP concentrations. In patients with NT-proBNP concentrations below the median (≤ 280 fmol/mL), TR was related with the outcome (HR: 2.512, CI: 1.127-5.597, P = 0.0242) but it was not in patients with NT-proBNP concentrations above the median (P = 0.3935). CONCLUSION: The prognostic impact of TR depends on the severity of CHF. While TR was significantly related with excess mortality in mild to moderate CHF, it provided no additive value in advanced disease when compared with established risk factors.

Repeat measurements of glycated haemoglobin A(1c) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: divergent behaviour in diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus have a substantially increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease. However, the absolute risk greatly varies not only among patients, but the risk profile for an individual patient may also change over time. We investigated the prognostic role of repetitive measurements of Glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c) ) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with longstanding diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this prospective, observational study data from 544 consecutive patients were collected between 2005 and 2008. HbA(1c) and NT-proBNP were measured at baseline and after 1 year. The median observation period was 40 months. Endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac, cardiovascular and all-cause hospitalizations. RESULTS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations significantly increased from 230 ± 385 to 280 ± 449 pg mL(-1) (P < 0·001); during the same time, HbA(1c) significantly decreased from 7·6 ± 1·5 to 7·3 ± 1·2 (P < 0·001). NT-proBNP was the best baseline predictor in a Cox regression model consisting of NT-proBNP, HbA(1c) , age, gender and duration of diabetes for all endpoints (P < 0·001). NT-proBNP at follow-up was the best predictor for the remaining period (P < 0·001, all endpoints). HbA(1c) at baseline and follow-up was predictive for all-cause hospitalizations (P = 0·005 both). In a third model that investigated the plasticity of both markers, changes in HbA(1c) concentration had no predictive value, but a change of NT-proBNP concentration was highly predictive (P = 0·025 all-cause mortality, P < 0·001 all other endpoints). CONCLUSIONS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and HbA(1c) concentrations significantly diverged over a 1-year period. NT-proBNP was the most potent predictor of outcome at baseline and follow-up, and changes in NT-proBNP concentrations were linked to an altered risk profile, unlike changes in HbA(1c) levels.

Cost analysis and cost-effectiveness of NT-proBNP-guided heart failure specialist care in addition to home-based nurse care.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure management programmes have been shown to reduce re-hospitalizations. We recently investigated a new disease management programme comparing usual care (UC) to home-based nurse care (HNC) and a HNC group in which decision-making was based on NT-proBNP levels (BNC). As re-hospitalization is the main contributing economic factor in heart failure expenditures, we hypothesized that this programme might be able to reduce costs and could be conducted cost effectively compared to UC. METHODS: One hundred and ninety congestive heart failure patients, who were included in a randomized trial to receive UC, HNC or BNC at discharge, were analysed in a cost-effectiveness model. Different models were applied to perform analysis of all medical costs, and the costs per year survived were chosen as an effectiveness parameter. RESULTS: Per patient costs because of heart failure treatment in the UC and the BNC group were € 7109 ± 11,687 and € 2991 ± 4885 (P=0·027), respectively. Corrected for death as a competing risk, the costs in the UC group were € 7893 ± 11,734 and were reduced by BNC to €3148 ± 4949 (P=0·012). Considering costs because of all-cause re-hospitalizations, calculated costs per year survived after discharge were € 19,694 ± 26,754 for UC, € 14,262 ± 25 330 for HNC (P > 0·05) and € 8784 ± 14,728 for BNC (t-test-based contrast P=0·015). In all models calculated, HNC was cost neutral. CONCLUSIONS: NT-BNP-guided heart failure specialist care in addition to home-based nurse care is cost effective and cheaper than standard care, whereas HNC is cost neutral.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided, intensive patient management in addition to multidisciplinary care in chronic heart failure a 3-arm, prospective, randomized pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether the addition of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided, intensive patient management (BM) to multidisciplinary care (MC) improves outcome in patients following hospitalization due to heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized due to HF experience frequent rehospitalizations and high mortality. METHODS: Patients hospitalized due to HF were randomized to BM, MC, or usual care (UC). Multidisciplinary care included 2 consultations from an HF specialist who provided therapeutic recommendations and home care by a specialized HF nurse. In addition, BM included intensified up-titration of medication by HF specialists in high-risk patients. NT-proBNP was used to define the level of risk and to monitor wall stress. This monitoring allowed for anticipation of cardiac decompensation and adjustment of medication in advance. RESULTS: A total of 278 patients were randomized in 8 Viennese hospitals. After 12 months, the BM group had the highest proportion of antineurohormonal triple-therapy (difference among all groups). Accordingly, BM reduced days of HF hospitalization (488 days) compared with the hospitalization for the MC (1,254 days) and UC (1,588 days) groups (p < 0.0001; significant differences among all groups). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the first HF rehospitalization (28%) was lower in the BM versus MC groups (40%; p = 0.06) and the MC versus UC groups (61%; p = 0.01). Moreover, the combined end point of death or HF rehospitalization was lower in the BM (37%) than in the MC group (50%; p < 0.05) and in the MC than in the UC group (65%; p = 0.04). Death rate was similar between the BM (22%) and MC groups (22%), but was lower compared with the UC group (39%; vs. BM: p < 0.02; vs. MC: p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MC alone, additional BM improves clinical outcome in patients after HF hospitalization. (BNP Guided Care in Addition to Multidisciplinary Care; NCT00355017).

Prognostic value of emerging neurohormones in chronic heart failure during optimization of heart failure-specific therapy.

BACKGROUND: Serial measurements of neurohormones have been shown to improve prognostication in the setting of acute heart failure (HF) or chronic HF without therapeutic intervention. We investigated the prognostic role of serial measurements of emerging neurohormones and BNP in a cohort of chronic HF patients undergoing increases in HF-specific therapy. METHODS: In this prospective study we included 181 patients with chronic systolic HF after an episode of hospitalization for worsening HF. Subsequently, HF therapy was gradually increased in the outpatient setting until optimized. We measured copeptin, midregional proadrenomedullin, C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment, midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide, and B-type natriuretic peptide before and after optimization of HF therapy. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 24 months. RESULTS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocker and beta-blockers were increased significantly during the 3-month titration period (P < 0.0001 for both). In a stepwise Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic HF, baseline and follow-up neurohormone concentrations were predictors of the primary endpoint as follows (baseline hazard ratios): copeptin 1.92, 95% CI 1.233-3.007, P = 0.004; midregional proadrenomedullin 2.79, 95% CI 1.297-5.995, P = 0.009; midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide 2.05, 95% CI 1.136-3.686, P = 0.017; C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment 2.24, 95% CI 1.133-4.425, P = 0.025; B-type natriuretic peptide 1.46, 95% CI 1.039-2.050, P = 0.029. CONCLUSIONS: In pharmacologically unstable chronic HF patients, baseline values and follow-up measures of copeptin, midregional proadrenomedullin, C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment, midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide, and B-type natriuretic peptide were equally predictive of all-cause mortality. Relative change of neurohormone values was noncontributory.

Comparison of midregional pro-atrial and B-type natriuretic peptides in chronic heart failure: influencing factors, detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and prediction of death.

OBJECTIVES: Midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) was assessed for the importance of influencing factors, the ability to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and the prognostic power compared with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in chronic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: MR-proANP is a biologically stable natriuretic peptide measured by a recently developed assay, with potential advantages over conventional natriuretic peptides such as BNP and NT-proBNP. METHODS: We measured MR-proANP, BNP, and NT-proBNP in 797 patients with chronic HF. RESULTS: All 3 natriuretic peptides were independently influenced by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and the presence of ankle edema. Area under receiver-operator characteristic curves for detection of an LVEF <40% were similar between MR-proANP (0.799 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.753 to 0.844]), BNP (0.803 [95% CI: 0.757 to 0.849]), and NT-proBNP (0.730 [95% CI: 0.681 to 0.778]). During a median observation time of 68 months, 492 (62%) patients died. In multiple Cox regression analysis each natriuretic peptide was the strongest prognostic parameter among various clinical variables. Proportion of explained variation showed that NT-proANP (4.36%) was a significantly stronger predictor of death than both NT-proBNP (2.47%, p < 0.0001) and BNP (2.42%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similarities in influencing factors and detection of reduced LVEF, MR-proANP outperformed BNP and NT-proBNP in the prediction of death. A new assay technology and the high biological stability of MR-proANP are potential explanations for these findings.

B-type natriuretic peptide predicts benefit from a home-based nurse care in chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Home-based nurse care (HBNC) can reduce adverse events in patients with chronic heart failure. However, which patients really benefit from such an intervention remains unclear. We investigated if B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a strong prognostic marker in chronic heart failure, can predict benefit from HBNC. METHODS AND RESULTS: After discharge from heart failure hospitalization, 96 patients were randomized to either HBNC for 12 months or usual care. The combined endpoint of death or heart failure hospitalization was evaluated after 12 and 24 months. The median value of BNP (267 pg/mL) was used as a cutoff value to predict benefit from the HBNC. HBNC reduced the endpoint after 12 (P = .013) and 24 months (P = .033, relative risk [RR] (95% confidence intervals): 0.42 [0.20-0.78] and 0.55 [0.31-0.98], respectively). This benefit from HBNC was dependent on BNP. In patients with supramedian BNP, the endpoint was significantly reduced after 12 (P = .002) and 24 months (P = .003, RR: 0.39 [0.20-0.76] and 0.50 [0.30-0.83], respectively), whereas in patients with inframedian BNP no significant changes occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A high BNP can predict benefit from HBNC in patients with chronic heart failure and may assist in selecting patients for such an intervention.

NT-proBNP has a high negative predictive value to rule-out short-term cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: This study evaluated the predictive value of NT-proBNP for patients with diabetes mellitus and compared the prognostic aptitude of this neurohumoral marker to traditional markers of cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective observational study was conducted in 631 diabetic patients. The composite endpoint consisted of unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular events or death within the observation period of 12 months. Of all variables analysed (age, gender, history of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease/any cardiac disease, smoking, duration of diabetes, body mass index, blood pressure, New York Heart Association-class, Dyspnoea score, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, LDL-cholesterol, HbA(1c), creatinine, glomerular filtration rate), the logarithm of NT-proBNP gave the most potent information in a stepwise Cox regression analysis (P < 0.0001). Bootstrapping with 500 samples supports this result in 95% samples. The negative predictive value of a normal value (<125 pg/mL) of NT-proBNP for short-term cardiovascular events in diabetic patients is 98%. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a strong and independent correlation between NT-proBNP and short-term prognosis of cardiovascular events for patients with diabetes mellitus. With a high negative predictive value it can identify individuals who are not at intermediate risk for cardiovascular events. NT-proBNP proved to be of higher predictive value than traditional cardiovascular markers, in this unselected cohort.

Comparison of copeptin, B-type natriuretic peptide, and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure: prediction of death at different stages of the disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the predictive value of copeptin over the entire spectrum of heart failure (HF) and compare it to the current benchmark markers, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). BACKGROUND: Vasopressin has been shown to increase with the severity of chronic HF. Copeptin is a fragment of pre-pro-vasopressin that is synthesized and secreted in equimolar amounts to vasopressin. Both hormones have a short lifetime in vivo, similar to BNPs, but in contrast to vasopressin, copeptin is very stable in vitro. The predictive value of copeptin has been shown in advanced HF, where it was superior to BNP for predicting 24-month mortality. METHODS: This was a long-term observational study in 786 HF patients from the whole spectrum of heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class I to IV, BNP 688 +/- 948 pg/ml [range 3 to 8,536 pg/ml], left ventricular ejection fraction 25 +/- 10% [range 5% to 65%]). RESULTS: The NYHA functional class was the most potent single predictor of 24-month outcome in a stepwise Cox regression model. The BNP, copeptin, and glomerular filtration rate were related to NYHA functional class (p < 0.0001 for trend). Copeptin was the most potent single predictor of mortality in patients with NYHA functional class II (p < 0.0001) and class III (p < 0.0001). In NYHA functional class IV, the outcome of patients was best predicted by serum sodium, but again, copeptin added additional independent information. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of copeptin are linked to excess mortality, and this link is maintained irrespective of the clinical signs of severity of the disease. Copeptin was superior to BNP or NT-proBNP in this study, but the markers seem to be closely related.

Prognostic value of sequential measurements of amino-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide in ambulatory heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the prognostic value of sequential NT-proBNP values in ambulatory heart failure patients after discharge, investigating whether the current value or the recent percent change is more important. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 166 patients, NT-proBNP was measured at discharge from heart failure hospitalisation and three months later. The combined endpoint of death or heart failure rehospitalisation was evaluated after a maximum of 18 months or at follow-up closure. During a mean observation time of 14+/-4 months, 63 patients (38%) reached the endpoint. In multiple Cox analysis, NT-proBNP three months after discharge (NT-proBNP-3Mo) and NT-proBNP percent change (NT-proBNP-%change) were the only independent predictors of the endpoint among various clinical and laboratory variables. After definition of a high- (n=83, 57% endpoints) and a low-NT-proBNP patient subgroup (n=83, 19% endpoints) according to the median NT-proBNP-3Mo (1751 pg/ml), NT-proBNP-%change was the strongest predictor in the high-NT-proBNP subgroup. In the low-NT-proBNP subgroup, NT-proBNP-3Mo was the only independent predictor. CONCLUSIONS: In ambulatory heart failure patients, the prognostic value of sequential NT-proBNP measurements depends on the magnitude of the current NT-proBNP value. Recent percent changes in NT-proBNP provide important prognostic information in patients with high NT-proBNP but not in patients with low NT-proBNP.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is an independent predictor of outcome in an unselected cohort of critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: Natriuretic peptides emerged during recent years as potent prognostic markers in patients with heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. In addition, natriuretic peptides show strong predictive value in patients with pulmonary embolism, sepsis, renal failure, and shock. The present study tests the prognostic information of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) in an unselected cohort of critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: A tertiary intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 289 consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit during a 16-month period with the following data: age 64 +/- 14 yrs, male n = 191, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 52 +/- 24, mechanical ventilation n = 180 (62%), vasopressors n = 179 (62%), renal failure n = 24 (8%). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma NT-pro-BNP samples (Roche Diagnostics) were obtained on intensive care unit admission. Data are given as median [range]. Intensive care unit survivors had significantly lower NT-pro-BNP values compared with intensive care unit nonsurvivors (3394 [24-35,000] vs. 6776 [303-35,000] pg/mL, survivors vs. nonsurvivors, respectively, p = .001). Hospital survivors were characterized by significantly lower NT-pro-BNP values (2656 [24-35,000] vs. 8390 [303-35,000] pg/mL, survivors vs. nonsurvivors, respectively, p = .001). NT-pro-BNP levels were not significantly different in patients with primary cardiac diagnosis compared with those with a noncardiac admission diagnosis (4794 [26-35,000], n = 202 vs. 3349 [24-35,000], n = 87, cardiac vs. noncardiac, respectively, p = .28). In a logistic regression model, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and NT-pro-BNP were independently associated with hospital survival (chi = 35.6, p = .0001 and chi = 11.3, p = .0008, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and NT-pro-BNP, respectively). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of NT-pro-BNP and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II were not statistically significant different regarding the prediction of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: NT-pro-BNP on admission is an independent prognostic marker of outcome in an unselected cohort of critically ill patients. A single measurement of NT-pro-BNP might facilitate triage of emergency and intensive care unit patients.

Levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 for uptitration of beta-blockade in patients with refractory, advanced chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: In advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) 20% of patients do not tolerate beta-blockers and 50% do not reach target doses. AIM: To test whether levosimendan or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) can facilitate uptitration of beta-blockers in advanced CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five advanced CHF patients (LVEF<35%, NYHA class IIIb or IV) intolerant to beta-blocker uptitration to target doses (10 mg bisoprolol/day) were randomised to a monthly 24 h infusion with levosimendan (n=39) or a chronic infusion with PGE1 (n=36) for 3 months. Bisoprolol was uptitrated following predefined criteria. At 12 weeks, bisoprolol dose increased from 4 mg to 10 mg in both groups. Heart failure worsening occurred in 29 levosimendan patients (74%) versus 16 PGE1 patients (44%, p=0.008). Uptitration was impossible in 9 levosimendan patients (23%) versus 2 PGE1 patients (6%, p=0.03). The combined endpoint of death or urgent heart transplantation or implantation of a ventricular assist device was reached by 12 levosimendan patients (31%) versus 4 PGE1 patients (11%, p=0.04). After 1 year, LVEF increased from 23+/-7% to 28+/-11% (p=0.0004), and BNP decreased from 994+/-806 to 659+/-564 pg/ml (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Levosimendan and PGE1 facilitate uptitration of beta-blockers in previously intolerant CHF patients. PGE1 treatment allowed uptitration in more patients and resulted in a better clinical outcome compared to levosimendan. This approach increased LVEF and decreased BNP after 1 year.