Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(9): 2692-2706, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37204633

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous family of tumors of challenging diagnosis and clinical management. Their incidence and prevalence continue to rise mainly due to an improvement on diagnostic techniques and awareness. Earlier detection, along with steadfast improvements in therapy, has led to better prognosis over time for advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this guideline is to update evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and lung NENs. Diagnostic procedures, histological classification, and therapeutic options, including surgery, liver-directed therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and systemic hormonal, cytotoxic or targeted therapy, are reviewed and discussed, and treatment algorithms to guide therapeutic decisions are provided.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Bronchial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bronchial Neoplasms/therapy , Algorithms , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy
2.
Med Oncol ; 31(5): 948, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24740650

ABSTRACT

Sorafenib is the standard treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with demonstrated outcome benefits in randomized clinical trials. We present a single-center experience with sorafenib with the aim to establish its efficacy and safety in daily clinical practice. A total of 62 patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg/12 h until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response rates, incidence of adverse events, actuarial disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for survival were also performed. Median treatment duration was 92 days. A 43% disease control rate was achieved (partial response, 15% and disease stabilization, 28%). After a median follow-up of 24.1 months, the median progression-free survival and OS for the overall population were 5.8 and 6.7 months, respectively, with survival rates of 27% at 1 year and 17 % at 2 years. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were fatigue (19%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), hypertension (5%), and diarrhea (3%). The univariate analysis showed that patient performance status (PS), use of previous treatments, and albumin >3.5 g/dL were significant prognostic factors for survival. In the multivariate study, only PS, alcoholic etiology and albumin >3.5 g/dL remained as independent predictors of survival. Sorafenib is a safe and moderately effective drug in HCC, although patients must be properly selected before starting therapy. Baseline PS, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging, and liver function should be taken into account as prognostic factors. Results in daily practice are somewhat inferior than observed in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/secondary , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Safety , Sorafenib , Survival Rate
3.
Case Rep Oncol ; 6(2): 391-6, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23904851

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To date, there are no guidelines for a rational and more favourable sequence of treatment after docetaxel. Two drugs (cabazitaxel and abiraterone) have recently been approved as second-line treatment after docetaxel failure in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but there are no studies comparing abiraterone versus cabazitaxel. The most suitable drug is chosen based on the physician's opinion and the patient's characteristics. In patients with a good performance status who are able to receive either treatment, it would be convenient to begin with cabazitaxel and to reserve abiraterone in case there is a worsening of the general status, in consideration of abiraterone's more favourable toxicity profile. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 74-year-old male with mCRPC who presented with an interesting and uncommon tumour dissemination (pleuropulmonary) occurring after the first standard treatment with docetaxel. Intravenous treatment with cabazitaxel 25 mg/m(2) and oral prednisone 10 mg continuously was initiated. The patient received a total of 8 cycles of chemotherapy. A reduction of mediastinal adenopathies and infrarenal para-aortic stable bone involvement and an absence of pleural effusion were observed. No relevant toxicity was noted. Since February 2012, a progressive PSA increase without clinical deterioration has been noted. CONCLUSIONS: The selection criteria for second- and third-line systemic treatment and the excellent response obtained with cabazitaxel in an unusual disease setting are described. The results confirm the long duration and quality of response of cabazitaxel treatment. Further therapeutic options in this group of patients are suggested.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...