Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0132735, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26207759

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study informs efforts to improve the discoverability of and access to biomedical datasets by providing a preliminary estimate of the number and type of datasets generated annually by research funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). It focuses on those datasets that are "invisible" or not deposited in a known repository. METHODS: We analyzed NIH-funded journal articles that were published in 2011, cited in PubMed and deposited in PubMed Central (PMC) to identify those that indicate data were submitted to a known repository. After excluding those articles, we analyzed a random sample of the remaining articles to estimate how many and what types of invisible datasets were used in each article. RESULTS: About 12% of the articles explicitly mention deposition of datasets in recognized repositories, leaving 88% that are invisible datasets. Among articles with invisible datasets, we found an average of 2.9 to 3.4 datasets, suggesting there were approximately 200,000 to 235,000 invisible datasets generated from NIH-funded research published in 2011. Approximately 87% of the invisible datasets consist of data newly collected for the research reported; 13% reflect reuse of existing data. More than 50% of the datasets were derived from live human or non-human animal subjects. CONCLUSION: In addition to providing a rough estimate of the total number of datasets produced per year by NIH-funded researchers, this study identifies additional issues that must be addressed to improve the discoverability of and access to biomedical research data: the definition of a "dataset," determination of which (if any) data are valuable for archiving and preservation, and better methods for estimating the number of datasets of interest. Lack of consensus amongst annotators about the number of datasets in a given article reinforces the need for a principled way of thinking about how to identify and characterize biomedical datasets.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/economics , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organization & administration , Publishing/organization & administration , Access to Information , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Databases, Bibliographic , Humans , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economics , United States
2.
Neuroinformatics ; 10(4): 331-9, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22622767

ABSTRACT

The National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) is a secure research data repository designed to promote scientific data sharing and collaboration among autism spectrum disorder investigators. The goal of the project is to accelerate scientific discovery through data sharing, data harmonization, and the reporting of research results. Data from over 25,000 research participants are available to qualified investigators through the NDAR portal. Summary information about the available data is available to everyone through that portal.


Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder , Biomedical Research , Cooperative Behavior , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Information Dissemination , Animals , Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Autistic Disorder/therapy , Biomedical Research/methods , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...