Descripción de la afectación de la destreza y función manual en pacientes con distonía focal de la mano / Alterations in dexterity and manual function in patients with focal hand dystonia

Introducción: La distonía focal de la mano es un trastorno del movimiento cuya sintomatología produce una alteración en el desempeño de tareas que requieren un nivel de destreza alto. Actualmente no se dispone de un modelo de interpretación de la enfermedad y son escasos los estudios que identifican las dificultades de las personas con distonía al desempeñar las actividades de la vida diaria (AVD). Por todo ello, el objetivo del estudio es describir la destreza manipulativa y su influencia en las AVD de los pacientes con distonía focal de la mano.Material y métodoSe realizó un estudio observacional, transversal, tipo casos y controles. Se reclutaron 24 participantes: 12 pacientes y 12 sujetos control. Los pacientes fueron derivados por el Servicio de Neurología del Hospital Ramón y Cajal. Se obtuvieron datos sociodemográficos y clínicos retrospectivos en el grupo de casos. Posteriormente, se administraron pruebas de evaluación, en el siguiente orden: Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) y Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF).ResultadosEn la muestra del estudio participaron un total de 24 personas, siete mujeres y 17 hombres, con una media de edad de 50,79 ± 14,40 años. Del total de participantes con distonía focal se observó que, aunque la mitad de la muestra no identificó signos de afectación neuromuscular, ni problemas psicoemocionales, un menor porcentaje de estos pacientes identificaron dificultades asociadas con el hombro derecho (25%) y el estado ansioso (33,3%).ConclusionesLos hallazgos encontrados en el presente trabajo señalan que la distonía focal de la mano afecta a la destreza manipulativa de estos pacientes, presentando una peor ejecución y requiriendo más tiempo para su ejecución. (AU)

Introduction: Focal hand dystonia is a movement disorder whose symptoms cause alterations in the performance of tasks requiring a high level of dexterity. Currently, there is no model for interpreting the disease and few studies have identified the difficulties of patients with dystonia in carrying out activities of daily living (ADL). This study aims to describe manipulative dexterity and its influence on ADLs in patients with focal hand dystonia.Materials and methodsWe performed an observational, cross-sectional, case-control study including 24 participants (12 patients with focal hand dystonia and 12 controls). The patients were referred by the neurology department of Hospital Ramón y Cajal. We gathered sociodemographic data, as well as retrospective clinical data for patients. We subsequently administered evaluation tests, in the following order: Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), and Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF).ResultsThe study sample included a total of 24 participants, 7 women and 17 men, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 50.79 (14.40) years. In the patient group, neuromuscular involvement or psycho-emotional problems were not detected in half of cases; smaller numbers of patients presented difficulties associated with the right shoulder (25%) and anxious state (33.3%).ConclusionsOur results indicate that focal hand dystonia affects manipulative dexterity in these patients, who showed poorer performance and required more time to complete the tasks. (AU)

Alterations in dexterity and manual function in patients with focal hand dystonia.

INTRODUCTION: Focal hand dystonia is a movement disorder whose symptoms cause alterations in the performance of tasks requiring a high level of dexterity. Currently, there is no model for interpreting the disease and few studies have identified the difficulties of patients with dystonia in carrying out activities of daily living (ADL). This study aims to describe manipulative dexterity and its influence on ADLs in patients with focal hand dystonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an observational, cross-sectional, case-control study including 24 participants (12 patients with focal hand dystonia and 12 controls). The patients were referred by the neurology department of Hospital Ramón y Cajal. We gathered sociodemographic data, as well as retrospective clinical data for patients. We subsequently administered evaluation tests, in the following order: Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), and Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF). RESULTS: The study sample included a total of 24 participants, 7 women and 17 men, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 50.79 (14.40) years. In the patient group, neuromuscular involvement or psycho-emotional problems were not detected in half of cases; smaller numbers of patients presented difficulties associated with the right shoulder (25%) and anxious state (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that focal hand dystonia affects manipulative dexterity in these patients, who showed poorer performance and required more time to complete the tasks.

Sensibilidad y dolor en distonías focales de la mano / Sensitivity and pain in focal dystonia of the hand

Introducción: Considerando las evidencias acumuladas actualmente es importante estudiar la fisiopatología tanto sensorial como motora de las distonías focales para comprenderlas y mejorar su tratamiento. Por ello, los objetivos del presente estudio son evaluar las aferencias somatosensoriales de los pacientes con distonía focal o segmentaria con afectación del miembro superior, comprobar si se corresponde con la mano de más uso, analizar la tolerancia al dolor y examinar la posible relación con la percepción del dolor en los pacientes con distonía segmentaria de la mano.MétodosSe contó con una muestra total de 24 participantes: 12 pacientes con distonía focal de la mano y 12 sujetos sin distonía. Todos ellos fueron evaluados con un algómetro electrónico (Somedic AB®, Farsta, Suecia), con los monofilamentos de Semmes-Weinstein y con la escala visual analógica.ResultadosLos datos hallados muestran, en la población estudiada, una mayor afectación en la sensibilidad superficial comparada con el grupo control, tanto en la mano dominante como en la no dominante, así como presencia de dolor (p > 0,001). Además, el grupo de distonía focal obtuvo una correlación negativa entre el dolor percibido y en el umbral de tolerancia de dolor a la presión (rho = −0,83; p < 0,001).ConclusionesLas personas con distonía segmentaria de la mano presentan una alteración en la sensibilidad y manifiestan mayor dolor percibido que las personas sin distonía. Se requieren más estudios con una muestra mayor que detecten las implicaciones clínicas y cotidianas, tanto del dolor objetivo como subjetivo. (AU)

Introduction: A growing body of evidence highlights the importance of understanding both the sensory and the motor pathophysiology of focal dystonia in order to improve its treatment. This study aims to evaluate somatosensory afferences in patients with focal or segmental dystonia affecting the upper limbs, to analyse whether the dominant limb is more frequently affected, to analyse pain tolerance, and to examine the potential association with pain perception in patients with hand dystonia.MethodsWe recruited 24 participants: 12 patients with focal hand dystonia and 12 individuals without dystonia. All participants were evaluated with a digital algometer (Somedic SenseLab AB®, Farsta, Sweden), a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and the visual analogue scale for pain.ResultsAccording to our data, patients showed greater impairment in surface sensitivity than controls, both in the dominant and the non-dominant hands, as well as greater presence of pain (P > .001). Furthermore, the dystonia group showed a negative correlation between perceived pain and pressure pain tolerance threshold (rho = −0.83; P < .001).ConclusionsPatients with focal hand dystonia presented alterations in sensitivity and more severe perceived pain than individuals without dystonia. Future studies with larger samples should aim to analyse the clinical implications and everyday impact of both objective and subjective pain. (AU)

Sensitivity and pain in focal dystonia of the hand.

INTRODUCTION: A growing body of evidence highlights the importance of understanding both the sensory and the motor pathophysiology of focal dystonia in order to improve its treatment. This study aims to evaluate somatosensory afferences in patients with focal or segmental dystonia affecting the upper limbs, to analyse whether the dominant limb is more frequently affected, to analyse pain tolerance, and to examine the potential association with pain perception in patients with hand dystonia. METHODS: We recruited 24 participants: 12 patients with focal hand dystonia and 12 individuals without dystonia. All participants were evaluated with a digital algometer (Somedic SenseLab AB®, Farsta, Sweden), a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and the visual analogue scale for pain. RESULTS: According to our data, patients showed greater impairment in surface sensitivity than controls, both in the dominant and the non-dominant hands, as well as greater presence of pain (P > .001). Furthermore, the dystonia group showed a negative correlation between perceived pain and pressure pain tolerance threshold (rho = -0.83; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with focal hand dystonia presented alterations in sensitivity and more severe perceived pain than individuals without dystonia. Future studies with larger samples should aim to analyse the clinical implications and everyday impact of both objective and subjective pain.

Alterations in dexterity and manual function in patients with focal hand dystonia. / Descripción de la afectación de la destreza y función manual en pacientes con distonía focal de la mano.

INTRODUCTION: Focal hand dystonia is a movement disorder whose symptoms cause alterations in the performance of tasks requiring a high level of dexterity. Currently, there is no model for interpreting the disease and few studies have identified the difficulties of patients with dystonia in carrying out activities of daily living (ADL). This study aims to describe manipulative dexterity and its influence on ADLs in patients with focal hand dystonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an observational, cross-sectional, case-control study including 24 participants (12 patients with focal hand dystonia and 12 controls). The patients were referred by the neurology department of Hospital Ramón y Cajal. We gathered sociodemographic data, as well as retrospective clinical data for patients. We subsequently administered evaluation tests, in the following order: Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), and Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF). RESULTS: The study sample included a total of 24 participants, 7 women and 17 men, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 50.79 (14.40) years. In the patient group, neuromuscular involvement or psycho-emotional problems were not detected in half of cases; smaller numbers of patients presented difficulties associated with the right shoulder (25%) and anxious state (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that focal hand dystonia affects manipulative dexterity in these patients, who showed poorer performance and required more time to complete the tasks.

Sensitivity and pain in focal dystonia of the hand. / Sensibilidad y dolor en distonías focales de la mano.

INTRODUCTION: A growing body of evidence highlights the importance of understanding both the sensory and the motor pathophysiology of focal dystonia in order to improve its treatment. This study aims to evaluate somatosensory afferences in patients with focal or segmental dystonia affecting the upper limbs, to analyse whether the dominant limb is more frequently affected, to analyse pain tolerance, and to examine the potential association with pain perception in patients with hand dystonia. METHODS: We recruited 24 participants: 12 patients with focal hand dystonia and 12 individuals without dystonia. All participants were evaluated with a digital algometer (Somedic SenseLab AB®, Farsta, Sweden), a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and the visual analogue scale for pain. RESULTS: According to our data, patients showed greater impairment in surface sensitivity than controls, both in the dominant and the non-dominant hands, as well as greater presence of pain (P>.001). Furthermore, the dystonia group showed a negative correlation between perceived pain and pressure pain tolerance threshold (rho=-0.83; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with focal hand dystonia presented alterations in sensitivity and more severe perceived pain than individuals without dystonia. Future studies with larger samples should aim to analyse the clinical implications and everyday impact of both objective and subjective pain.

[The Prefrontal Symptoms Inventory (PSI) in acquired brain injury: agreement between the scores of patients, relatives and professionals]. / Inventario de sintomas prefrontales (ISP) en el daño cerebral adquirido: concordancia entre puntuaciones de paciente, familiar y profesional.

INTRODUCTION: The use of self-reports about symptoms of malfunctioning in daily life derived from functional deficits of a prefrontal origin has become widespread in clinical practice, since they allow incremental ecological validity to be added to other specific tests. Yet it remains to be determined whether self-assessment is sufficient on its own or if the participation of an external evaluator would be preferable. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Prefrontal Symptoms Inventory (PSI) was administered to 115 subjects being treated for a range of brain pathologies. The same test, referring to the patient, was administered to one of the professionals closely following the development of the case and, whenever possible (n = 88), a relative or caregiver. The psychometric goodness of the PSI was explored in the three samples, and the degree of correlation and agreement among the three assessments was estimated. RESULTS: The three assessments showed significant correlation, although the patients reported fewer symptoms than their relatives and caregivers in terms of executive functioning. The assessments of relatives and patients were superposed and showed a high degree of agreement as regards both profile and magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the mandatory neuropsychological assessment, we recommend the administration of questionnaires or inventories about symptoms such as the PSI, with proven psychometric robustness, that make it possible to explore the impact of brain dysfunctions in daily functioning. Since many of these dysfunctions are accompanied by different degrees of anosognosia, they should be administered to external observers, relatives or professionals, with the intention of obtaining a more adequate assessment of the magnitude of the functional difficulties.

TITLE: Inventario de sintomas prefrontales (ISP) en el daño cerebral adquirido: concordancia entre puntuaciones de paciente, familiar y profesional.Introduccion. El uso de autoinformes sobre sintomas de mal funcionamiento en la vida diaria derivados de deficits funcionales de origen prefrontal se ha generalizado en la practica clinica, dado que permiten aportar validez ecologica incremental a otras pruebas especificas. Sin embargo, queda por determinar si la autoevaluacion es suficiente por si misma o es preferible la participacion de un evaluador externo. Sujetos y metodos. Se administro el inventario de sintomas prefrontales (ISP) a 115 sujetos en tratamiento por diversas patologias cerebrales. La misma prueba, referida al paciente, se administro a algun profesional que siguiera estrechamente la evolucion del caso y, cuando fue posible (n = 88), a un familiar o cuidador. Se exploro la bondad psicometrica del ISP en las tres muestras y se estimo el grado de correlacion y concordancia entre las tres evaluaciones. Resultados. Las tres evaluaciones mostraron correlacion significativa, aunque los pacientes declararon menos sintomas que sus familiares y cuidadores en funcionamiento ejecutivo. Las evaluaciones de familiares y pacientes se superpusieron y mostraron un alto grado de concordancia en perfil y magnitud. Conclusiones. Se recomienda, junto con la obligada evaluacion neuropsicologica, la cumplimentacion de cuestionarios o inventarios de sintomas como el ISP, con probada robustez psicometrica, que permitan explorar el impacto de las disfunciones cerebrales en el funcionamiento cotidiano. Dado que muchas de estas disfunciones se acompañan de diversos grados de anosognosia, se recomienda su administracion a observadores externos, familiares o profesionales, de cara a obtener una evaluacion mas adecuada de la magnitud de las dificultades funcionales.

Outcomes of a multicomponent intervention on occupational performance in persons with unilateral acquired brain injury.

Complications after unilateral acquired brain injury (ABI) can affect various areas of expertise causing (depending on the location of the lesion) impairment in occupational performance. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the concepts of occupational performance and functional independence, both before and after a multicomponent intervention including occupational therapy, in persons with unilateral brain damage. This was a longitudinal quasi-experimental pretest post-test study in a sample of 58 patients with unilateral brain injury (28 with traumatic brain injury and 30 with ischemic stroke). The patients' level of independence was measured using the short version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. We also measured quality of performance using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. The findings of this study showed that patients with injury in the right hemisphere improved more than those with left hemisphere damage (p<0.001). All the patients with ABI, especially those with right-sided injury, derived benefit from the multicomponent intervention, except in the area of motor skills. More research is needed on the specific techniques that might address such skills.

Predictores de funcionalidad en el daño cerebral adquirido / Functionality predictors in acquired brain damage

Introducción: La mayoría de las personas que han sobrevivido a un daño cerebral presentan secuelas que afectan a componentes sensoriomotores, cognitivos, emocionales o conductuales. Estos déficits repercuten en la correcta ejecución de actividades de la vida diaria. El objetivo de este estudio es identificar diferencias funcionales entre personas con daño cerebral adquirido (DCA) unilateral, mediante la independencia funcional, la capacidad y la realización de las actividades cotidianas. Método: Diseño transversal descriptivo con una muestra de 58 personas con lesiones derechas (n = 14 TCE, n = 15 ECV) e izquierdas (n = 14 TCE, n = 15 ECV), diestros, con una media de edad de 47 años y una media de 4 ± 3,65 años de evolución. Las medidas utilizadas fueron la FIM FAM y la CIF. Resultados: Los datos apuntan hacia la existencia de diferencias significativas (p < 0,000) y un elevado tamaño del efecto (dr = 0,78) en las estimaciones transversales, otorgando una menor restricción en la participación en las personas con lesión derecha. Las diferencias más destacadas se encuentran en las variables «recepción de mensajes hablados», «escritura» y «habla inteligible». Al hacer una regresión lineal, los resultados muestran que solo 4 variables de la FIM FAM predicen, en su conjunto, un 44% la variancia de la CIF que mide la capacidad del individuo y hasta un 52% de la CIF que mide la realización del sujeto. Tan solo la marcha predeciría un 28% de la variancia. Conclusiones: Se sugiere que las personas con DCA en el hemisferio izquierdo presentan importantes diferencias en variables funcionales y de la comunicación. Los aspectos motores representan un gran factor pronóstico para la rehabilitación funcional

Introduction: Most individuals who have survived an acquired brain injury present consequences affecting the sensorimotor, cognitive, affective or behavioural components. These deficits affect the proper performance of daily living activities. The aim of this study is to identify functional differences between individuals with unilateral acquired brain injury using functional independence, capacity, and performance of daily activities. Method: Descriptive cross-sectional design with a sample of 58 people, with right-sided injury (n = 14 TBI; n = 15 stroke) or left-sided injury (n = 14 TBI, n = 15 stroke), right handed, and with a mean age of 47 years and time since onset of 4 ± 3.65 years. The functional assessment/functional independence measure (FIM/FAM) and the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) were used for the study. Results: The data showed significant differences (P<.000), and a large size effect (dr=0.78) in the cross-sectional estimates, and point to fewer restrictions for patients with a lesion on their right side. The major differences were in the variables ‘speaking’ and ‘receiving spoken messages’ (ICF variables), and ‘Expression’, ‘Writing’ and ‘intelligible speech’ (FIM/FAM variables). In the linear regression analysis, the results showed that only 4 FIM/FAM variables, taken together, predict 44% of the ICF variance, which measures the ability of the individual, and up to 52% of the ICF, which measures the individual's performance. Gait alone predicts a 28% of the variance. Conclusions: It seems that individuals with acquired brain injury in the left hemisphere display important differences regarding functional and communication variables. The motor aspects are an important prognostic factor in functional rehabilitation

Functionality predictors in acquired brain damage.

INTRODUCTION: Most individuals who have survived an acquired brain injury present consequences affecting the sensorimotor, cognitive, affective or behavioural components. These deficits affect the proper performance of daily living activities. The aim of this study is to identify functional differences between individuals with unilateral acquired brain injury using functional independence, capacity, and performance of daily activities. METHOD: Descriptive cross-sectional design with a sample of 58 people, with right-sided injury (n=14 TBI; n=15 stroke) or left-sided injury (n = 14 TBI, n = 15 stroke), right handed, and with a mean age of 47 years and time since onset of 4 ± 3.65 years. The functional assessment/functional independence measure (FIM/FAM) and the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) were used for the study. RESULTS: The data showed significant differences (P<.000), and a large size effect (dr=0.78) in the cross-sectional estimates, and point to fewer restrictions for patients with a lesion on their right side. The major differences were in the variables 'speaking' and 'receiving spoken messages' (ICF variables), and 'Expression', 'Writing' and 'intelligible speech' (FIM/FAM variables). In the linear regression analysis, the results showed that only 4 FIM/FAM variables, taken together, predict 44% of the ICF variance, which measures the ability of the individual, and up to 52% of the ICF, which measures the individual's performance. Gait alone predicts a 28% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that individuals with acquired brain injury in the left hemisphere display important differences regarding functional and communication variables. The motor aspects are an important prognostic factor in functional rehabilitation.

[Evaluation of the community integration of persons with lateralised post-acute acquired brain injury]. / Valoracion de la integracion en la comunidad de las personas con daño cerebral adquirido postagudo lateralizado.

INTRODUCTION. Hemispheric specialization is a topic of interest that has motivated an enormous amount of research in recent decades. After a unilateral brain injury, the consequences can affect various areas of specialization, leading, depending on the location of the injury, impairment in quality of life and community integration. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Cross-sectional study with a sample of 58 patients, 28 traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 30 cerebrovascular accidents, both lateralized. The level of integration in the community is measured by the Community Integration Questionnaire. RESULTS. There were three groups analyzed by considering unilateral injury (full sample, stroke sample, and TBI sample). Results showed a significantly high community integration of people with right hemisphere injury. However, to measure the level of community integration between TBI and stroke, the results showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION. According to the results of the study people with brain injury in the right hemisphere have a better community integration than people with lesions in the left hemisphere regardless of the origin of the lesions (vascular or traumatic). We discussed the reasons that may motivate the differences and clinical implications.

TITLE: Valoracion de la integracion en la comunidad de las personas con daño cerebral adquirido postagudo lateralizado.Introduccion. La especializacion hemisferica es un tema de interes que ha motivado un gran volumen de investigacion en las ultimas decadas. Tras una lesion cerebral lateralizada, las secuelas pueden afectar a diversas areas de especializacion, provocando, en funcion de la localizacion de la lesion, una afectacion en la calidad de vida y en la integracion comunitaria. Pacientes y metodos. Estudio transversal con una muestra de 58 pacientes, 28 con traumatismos craneoencefalicos (TCE) y 30 con accidentes cerebrovasculares (ACV), ambos lateralizados. El nivel de integracion en la comunidad se midio con el cuestionario de integracion comunitaria (CIQ). Resultados. De los grupos analizados teniendo en cuenta la lesion lateralizada (muestra completa, muestra de ACV y muestra de TCE), los resultados mostraron una significativamente mayor integracion comunitaria de las personas con lesion en el hemisferio derecho. Sin embargo, al medir el nivel de integracion comunitaria entre TCE y ACV, los resultados no mostraron diferencias significativas. Conclusion. Segun los resultados del estudio, las personas con lesion cerebral en el hemisferio derecho presentan una mejor integracion comunitaria que las personas con lesion en el hemisferio izquierdo, con independencia del origen de las lesiones (vascular o traumatica). Se discuten las razones que pueden motivar las diferencias y las implicaciones clinicas.