Nutrition Care after Hospital Discharge in Singapore: Evidence-Based Best-Practice Recommendations.

The nutritional status of hospitalised patients is often at risk or compromised and predisposed to further deterioration after discharge, leading to poor clinical outcomes, high healthcare costs, and poor quality of life. This paper aims to provide evidence-based best-practice recommendations to address this, supported by a national survey of healthcare professionals in Singapore and reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel under the Sarcopenia Interest Group of Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Singapore (SingSPEN). We advocate screening all patients with a validated tool which includes a disease activity/burden component, an easily accessible dietitian referral pathway for patients at risk of malnutrition, and an individualised nutrition care plan formulated and delivered using a multidisciplinary team approach for patients at risk or with malnutrition. A comprehensive team would include not only dietitians but also physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, speech therapists, and medical social workers working together towards a common goal. Information on why nutrition is important for good health and how it can be achieved should also be provided to all patients and their caregivers before and after hospital discharge. With the above recommendations, we seek to improve upon the current nutrition care processes at discharge for healthcare institutions in Singapore.

Prehabilitation Program Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Elective Liver Resection.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative phase can be effectively used by multidisciplinary teams to optimize the surgical candidate to improve perioperative outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prehabilitation program (PP) in patients undergoing elective liver resection (LR). METHODS: This was a prospective study including patients undergoing elective LR from February 2016 to October 2017. Outcomes of patients enrolled into PP were compared with patients receiving standard care. PP involved physiotherapist, dietitian, and case managers along with surgical and anesthetic services. Postoperative morbidity, length of stay, 90-day mortality, readmission rate, quality of life, and cost were measured. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled into PP and compared with 34 patients receiving standard care. Median Charlson comorbidity index was higher in PP group (4 versus 3, P = 0.03). PP showed reduction in overall morbidity (30% versus 52.9%, P = 0.02) and social issues (nil versus 3, P = 0.03). Quality of life survey showed improved social well-being. A tendency to cost savings was observed in prehabilitation group with 16.5% ($1359) cost reduction (median cost $6892 versus $8251, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: PP improves outcomes in patients undergoing elective LR.

A prospective validation of Sepsis-3 guidelines in acute hepatobiliary sepsis: qSOFA lacks sensitivity and SIRS criteria lacks specificity (Cohort Study).

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in 2016, the Sepsis-3 guidelines, with emphasis on the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, have generated much debate and controversy. It is recognised that the new definitions require validation in specific clinical settings and have yet to be universally adopted. We aim to validate new Sepsis-3 guidelines in acute hepatobiliary infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients admitted with acute hepatobiliary infection from the emergency department from July 2016 to June 2017 was studied. The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, SOFA and qSOFA scores were calculated and predictive performance evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for predictive ability of these indices for critical care unit admission and morbidity. RESULTS: 124 patients with a median age of 64.5 years and majority males (n = 75, 60.5%) were admitted with acute hepatobiliary infection during the study period. Acute cholecystitis was the most common admission diagnosis (n = 83, 66.9%) and most patients were managed in general ward (n = 91, 73.3%) with median length of stay of 6 days (range 1-40). On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003) predicted high dependency unit (HDU) admission, while age (p = 0.001), positive blood culture (p = 0.012), positive fluid culture (p = 0.015) and SOFA score (p = 0.002) predicted length of hospital stay. The sensitivity of SIRS in predicting HDU admission (60% vs. 4%), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (62.5% vs. 0%) and morbidity (66.7% vs. 0%) was higher than qSOFA score. The specificity of qSOFA in predicting HDU admission (100% vs. 49.5%), ICU admission (99.1% vs. 53.3%) and morbidity (99.2% vs. 47.9%) was higher than SIRS criteria. CONCLUSION: The SIRS criteria has high sensitivity and the qSOFA score has high specificity in predicting outcomes of patients with acute hepatobiliary infection.