Modulation of EphA receptor function by coexpressed ephrinA ligands on retinal ganglion cell axons.

The Eph family is thought to exert its function through the complementary expression of receptors and ligands. Here, we show that EphA receptors colocalize on retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons with EphA ligands, which are expressed in a high-nasal-to-low-temporal pattern. In the stripe assay, only temporal axons are normally sensitive for repellent axon guidance cues of the caudal tectum. However, overexpression of ephrinA ligands on temporal axons abolishes this sensitivity, whereas treatment with PI-PLC both removes ephrinA ligands from retinal axons and induces a striped outgrowth of formerly insensitive nasal axons. In vivo, retinal overexpression of ephrinA2 leads to topographic targeting errors of temporal axons. These data suggest that differential ligand expression on retinal axons is a major determinant of topographic targeting in the retinotectal projection.

Response of retinal ganglion cell axons to striped linear gradients of repellent guidance molecules.

Although molecular gradients have long been postulated to play a role in the development of topographic projections in the nervous system, relatively little is known about how axons evaluate gradients. Do growth cones respond to concentration or to slope? Do they react suddenly or gradually? Is there adaptation? In the developing retinotectal system, temporal retinal ganglion cell axons have previously been shown to avoid repellent cell-surface activities distributed in gradients across the optic tectum. We confronted temporal retinal axons with precisely formed striped linear gradients of repellent tectal membranes and of two candidate repellent molecules, ephrin-A2 and -A5. Axons entered gradient stripes independently of their slope and extended unhindered in the uphill direction until they suddenly avoided an apparent threshold concentration of repellent material that was independent of slope. This critical concentration was similar in both linear and nonlinear gradients, and hence independent of gradient shape. When gradients of identical slope were formed on different basal levels of repellent material, axons grew uphill for a fixed increment of concentration, possibly measured from the lowest point of the gradient, rather than up to a fixed absolute concentration. The speed of growth cones was not affected by repellent unstriped gradients below the critical concentration level. Similar results were found with membranes from cell lines stably transfected with either ephrin-A5 or ephrin-A2, two previously identified growth cone repellent cell-surface proteins. These data suggest that growth cones or axons can integrate guidance information over large distances, probably by a combined memory and adaptation mechanism.

Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro.

In order to test the preference of growing axons for membrane-associated positional specificity a new in vitro assay was developed. In this assay, membrane fragments of two different sources are arranged as a carpet of very narrow alternating strips. Axons growing on such striped carpets are simultaneously confronted with the two substrates at the stripe borders. If there is a preference of axons for one or the other substrate they become oriented by the stripes and grow within the lanes of the preferred substrate. Such preferential growth could, in principle, be due to affinity to attractive factors on the preferred stripes or avoidance of repulsive factors on the alternate stripes. This assay system was used to investigate growth of chick retinal axons on tectal membranes. Tissue strips cut from various areas of the retina were explanted and the extending axons were confronted with stripes of cell membranes from various areas within the optic tectum. Tectal cell membranes prove to be an excellent substrate for the growth of retinal axons. Nasal and temporal axons can grow well on membranes of both posterior and anterior tectal cells. If, however, temporal axons are given a choice and encounter the border between anterior and posterior membranes they show a marked preference for growth on membranes of the anterior tectum, their natural target area. Nasal axons do not show a preference in this assay system. The transition from nasal to temporal properties within the retina is abrupt. In contrast, the transition from anterior to posterior properties of the tectal cell membranes occurs as a smooth gradient. Significantly, the positional differences of tectal membrane properties are only seen during the period of development of the retinotectal projection and are independent of tectal innervation by retinal axons. These anterior-posterior differences disappear by embryonic day 14.

Position-dependent properties of retinal axons and their growth cones.

The formation of the very orderly neuronal projection from the retina to the optic tectum is not yet understood, but several mechanisms are thought to be involved in a coordinated fashion. These mechanisms may include mechanical or chemical guidance in channels, guidance by spatial gradients of positional markers, gradients of temporal (maturation) markers or specific inter-axon interactions (see ref. 1 for review). The last-mentioned mechanism could explain the fibre order found in optic nerve and tract. It requires that some or all growing retinal axons can distinguish between retinal axons of various origins and grow preferentially along retinal axons originating from the same area as themselves. The in vitro experiments described here show that growth cones from the temporal half of the chick retina grow preferentially along temporal axons, whereas growth cones from nasal retina do not distinguish between nasal and temporal axons.

In vitro experiments on axon guidance demonstrating an anterior-posterior gradient on the tectum.

Axonal growth cones originating from explants of embryonic chick retina were simultaneously exposed to two different cell monolayers and their preference for particular monolayers as a substrate for growth was determined. These experiments show that: (1) nasal retinal axons can distinguish between retinal and tectal cells; (2) temporal retinal axons can distinguish between tectal cells that originated from different positions within the tectum along the antero-posterior axis; (3) axons originating from nasal parts of the retina have different recognizing capabilities from temporal axons; (4) the property of the tectal cells, which is attractive for temporal axons, has a graded distribution along the antero-posterior axis of the tectum; and (5) this gradient also exists in non-innervated tecta.