A system-wide extracorporeal membrane oxygenation quality collaborative improves patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in adult patient populations has grown rapidly with wide variation in practices and outcomes. We evaluated the impact on patient outcomes, resource use, and costs of an initiative to coordinate and standardize best practices across ECMO programs within a large integrated health care system. METHODS: The ECMO Collaborative Project brought clinicians and service-line leaders from 4 programs within a single health care system together with operational subject matter experts tasked with developing and implementing standardized guidelines, order sets, and an internal database to support an automated quarterly report card. Patient outcomes, resource use, and financial measures were compared for the 16 months before (January 2017 to April 2018; "precollaborative," n = 185) versus the 14 months after (November 2018 to December 2019, "postcollaborative," n = 243) a 6-month implementation and blanking period. Subset analyses were performed for venoarterial ECMO, venovenous ECMO, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: Survival to discharge/transfer increased significantly (in-hospital mortality hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.58-0.99) for the postcollaborative versus the precollaborative period (107/185, 57.8% vs 113/243, 46.5%, P = .03), predominantly due to improvement among patients receiving venoarterial ECMO (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.91). The percentage of patients successfully weaned from ECMO increased from 58.9% (109/185) to 70% (170/243), P = .02. Complication rates decreased by 40% (incidence rate ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72). No significant changes were observed in ECMO duration, intensive care unit or hospital length of stay, or cost-per-case; payment-per-case and contribution-margin-per-case both decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The ECMO Collaborative Project improved survival to discharge/transfer, weaning rates and complications, without additional costs, through coordination and standardization across ECMO programs within a health care system.

Misclassification of Mitral Valve Disease and Rate of Surgical Repair in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is considered an indicator of quality performance. Therefore, accurate data reporting is critical for quality assessment. During an institutional quality review, MR etiology could not be determined in 40% of operations in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database entries, and therefore our true repair rate could not be reliably ascertained. Therefore, we reviewed all source documents and echocardiograms to assess our true disease etiology and repair rate. METHODS: Source records and echocardiograms of all operations performed in a single health care system for a 1-year period were reviewed by an experienced mitral valve surgeon, an echocardiographic core laboratory, and a data manager. Disease etiology and operation were compared with data previously entered in the database by post hoc chart abstraction. RESULTS: In all, 314 isolated mitral valve operations were performed. The MR was originally classified as primary, 163 (52%); secondary, 22 (7%); rheumatic, 37 (12%); endocarditis, 24 (8%); other, 33 (10%); and unknown, 35 (11%). Reported repair rate for primary MR was 142 of 163 (87.1%). After review, etiology was determined to be primary, 177 (56%); secondary, 33 (11%); rheumatic, 61 (20%); endocarditis, 25 (8%); and others, 18 (5%)-resulting in a change of classification in 99 of 314 patients (31.5%) and a true repair rate for primary MR of 165 of 177 (93.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Source document and imaging review of mitral valve surgery revealed significant discordance with post hoc chart abstraction methods. A more detailed data entry methodology is necessary to accurately report the true disease etiology and repair rates for primary MR.

Description of a Method to Obtain Complete One-Year Follow-Up in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination requires centers performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to report clinical outcomes up to 1 year. Many sites encounter challenges in obtaining complete 1-year follow-up. We report our process to address this challenge. A multidisciplinary process involving clinical personnel, data and quality managers, and research coordinators was initiated to collect TAVI data at baseline, 30 days, and 1 year. This process included (1) planned clinical follow-up of all patients at 30 days and 1 year; (2) query of health-care system-wide integrated data warehouse (IDW) to ascertain last date of clinical contact within the system for all patients; (3) online obituary search, cross-referencing for unique patient identifiers to determine if mortality occurred in remaining unknown patients; and (4) phone calls to remaining unknown patients or patients' families. Between January 2012 and December 2016, 744 patients underwent TAVI. All 744 patients were eligible for 30-day follow-up and 546 were eligible for 1-year follow-up. At routine clinical follow-up of 22 of 744 (3%) patients at 30 days and 180 of 546 (33%) patients at 1 year had unknown survival status. The integrated data warehouse query confirmed status-alive for an additional 1 of 22 patients at 30 days (55%) and 91 of 180 patients at 1 year (51%). Obituaries were identified for 23 of 180 additional patients at 1 year (13%). Phone contact identified the remaining unknown patients at 30 days and 1 year, resulting in 100% known survival status for patients at 30 days (744 of 744) and at 1 year (546 of 546). In conclusion, using a comprehensive approach, we were able to determine survival status in 100% of patients who underwent TAVI.